Article 50 of the EU AI Act is deceptively simple: if users are interacting with AI, they should know. The simplicity hides the work — "tell them" means specific notice language at specific moments, and most products ship without ever writing it down.
I built TransparaKit because the notice is the kind of thing that's "obviously someone's job" and therefore nobody's until launch week.
30-second takeaway
- Transparency isn't a single banner; it's notice at each touchpoint where AI shows up.
- The notice language and its placement are both part of the duty.
- A draft you can place beats a principle nobody implemented.
The notice nobody owns
A chatbot, an image generator, a summarizer — each is a moment a user might not realize a machine is in the loop. Article 50 wants those moments marked. In practice the copy gets written ad hoc, if at all, and placement is an afterthought bolted onto one screen.
Drafting the notice from the real touchpoint — and a checklist for where it goes — turns a vague duty into a shippable artifact.
What the tool does
You paste a user touchpoint. It returns Article 50 notice lines and a placement checklist. The output is a draft you can implement, not a compliance certificate — open the tool and try it, no signup.
TransparaKit runs in the browser, no account, no key.
FAQ
What is TransparaKit?
A tool that drafts Article 50 transparency notice language and a placement checklist from a described user touchpoint. No account, no key.
Does drafting the notice make me compliant?
It gives you the words and the placement plan to start from. Sufficiency is still a human call — this is decision-support.
Is this legal advice?
No. It drafts from your description; it doesn't interpret the law for your situation.
Author's Process
This product was built with AI coding tools. The discipline was keeping it a draft a team can implement, not a promise of clearance.
Top comments (0)