Shipping an AI feature into the EU tends to start with a legal question and stall there. Product wants to know what to build; counsel wants to know what the system does. Between them sits a classification step nobody owns, so the conversation loops.
ClauseGuard turns a description of your AI system into a risk-tier classification and a remediation gap report against the Act's obligations.
30-second takeaway
- Readiness starts with a risk tier, not with a stack of paperwork.
- A gap report is more actionable than a verdict, because it names what is missing.
- The output is a working draft for product and legal leads, not a final legal sign-off.
Why classification comes first
Obligations depend on the kind of system you are shipping, so the first useful question is which risk tier it falls into. ClauseGuard scores that from the description you provide, then produces a gap report showing where the setup falls short. Doing this before a legal review gives counsel something concrete to react to.
Why a gap report beats a pass-or-fail answer
A single pass-or-fail answer is easy to read and hard to use. The remediation gap report is structured around what is missing, which makes it a to-do list you can assign. Saved history lets you re-run the scoring after changes and see what moved. It is a first pass, not a substitute for counsel.
What the tool does
You describe your AI system. ClauseGuard returns a risk-tier scoring, a remediation gap report against EU AI Act obligations, and saved history of your runs so you can compare passes. It is EU-focused, for product and legal leads launching AI features into the EU. Open ClauseGuard and try it.
FAQ
Who is this for?
Product and legal leads at SaaS companies launching AI features into the EU who want a structured first pass.
Is this a final legal opinion or sign-off?
No. For a final legal sign-off or for regimes outside the EU, confirm with counsel. It is a readiness scoring and gap report, not legal advice, and it does not certify compliance.
Can I use it for non-EU rules?
It is EU-focused. Other regimes still need their own review.
Author's Process
I built this with AI coding tools. The value is the fast scoring-and-review loop before the legal conversation, not another compliance dashboard.
Top comments (0)