Article 4 of the EU AI Act asks deployers to ensure people using AI understand what they're using. Sounds like a training mandate; in practice it's a curricula problem nobody owns until an auditor asks what your staff actually knows.
I built LiteracyKit because the deliverable is a curriculum draft, not a webinar you'll never schedule.
30-second takeaway
- AI literacy isn't one course; it's role-specific understanding of the systems people touch.
- The Act wants evidence you did it — which means a curriculum with gaps named, not a slide deck.
- A draft you can assign beats a policy that says "training TBD."
The training that never gets scheduled
Every compliance checklist has an AI-literacy box. Almost none has a curriculum. So when the question comes, the answer is "we'll do something," and "something" never ships because nobody was assigned to define it for each role.
Drafting the curriculum from the actual staff roles and the actual AI systems turns the box into content. Naming the evidence gaps honestly is the part that survives audit.
What the tool does
You paste your staff roles and the AI systems they touch. It drafts an Article 4 literacy curriculum with modules and the evidence gaps to close. Open the tool and try it — no signup.
LiteracyKit runs in the browser, no account, no key.
FAQ
What is LiteracyKit?
A tool that drafts an Article 4 AI-literacy curriculum from your staff roles and AI systems, including evidence gaps. No account, no key.
Does a curriculum mean we've met Article 4?
It gives you the draft to assign and the gaps to close. Actually delivering and recording it is the human part.
Is this legal advice?
No. Decision-support for curriculum drafting, not a legal interpretation.
Author's Process
This product was built with AI coding tools. The point was a draft teams can assign, not a compliance theater slide deck.
Top comments (0)