Written by Kapeel Kokane✏️
Next.js is well known for its file system-based routing. However, Next.js v13, which is new at the time of writing, has changed the manner in which many tasks were previously performed through its new app
directory.
While still supporting the same file system-based routing, which uses the pages
directory, the new app
directory introduces the concepts of layouts, error components, and loading components while also leveraging React's server components for building a UI. In this article, we’ll explore these new features by building a simple app. Let's get started!
Table of contents
- New features in Next.js 13
- Caveats of using the
app
directory - Hands-on with Next.js 13
- Data fetching
New features in Next.js 13
Before we get started working on a project with Next.js 13, we'll review the new features and concepts that Next.js 13 has introduced.
Page directory vs. app directory
If you’ve worked with previous versions of Next.js, you might already be familiar with the pages
directory. Any file created inside of the pages
directory would act as a route in the UI. For example, pages/home.jsx
would take care of the /home
route:
The new app
directory works alongside the pages
directory to support incremental adoption and provides other new features like server-side rendering and static-site generation.
Routing with the app
directory
Just like files inside of the pages
directory, routing with the app
directory is controlled via the folders inside of it. The UI for a particular route is defined with a page.jsx
file inside of the folder.
Therefore, a folder structure that looks like app/profile/settings/page.jsx
will take care of rendering the /profile/settings
route:
loading.tsx
file
loading.tsx
is an optional file that you can create within any directory inside the app
folder. It automatically wraps the page inside of a React suspense boundary. The component will be shown immediately on the first load as well as when you're navigating between the sibling routes.
error.tsx
file
error.tsx
is an optional file that isolates the error to the smallest possible subsection of the app. Creating the error.tsx
file automatically wraps the page inside of a React error boundary. Whenever any error occurs inside the folder where this file is placed, the component will be replaced with the contents of this component.
layout.tsx
file
You can use the layout.tsx
file to define a UI that is shared across multiple places. A layout can render another layout or a page inside of it. Whenever a route changes to any component that is within the layout, its state is preserved because the layout component is not unmounted.
template.tsx
file
template.tsx
is similar to the layout.tsx
file, but upon navigation, a new instance of the component is mounted and the state is not preserved.
Using layouts and templates allows us to take advantage of a concept known as partial rendering. While moving between routes inside of the same folder, only the layouts and pages inside of that folder are fetched and rendered:
Caveats of using the app
directory
With so many changes having been introduced in Next.js 13, there are some things that we need to keep in mind when moving to the app
directory from the pages
directory.
Mandatory root layout
There must be a file that defines the root layout at the top level of the app directory. This layout is applicable to all the routes in the app. In addition, the root layout must define the <html>
and the <body>
tags because Next.js does not automatically add them.
Head tag
Inside any folder in the app
directory, we'll create a head.js
file that will define the contents of the <head>
tag for that folder. The component returned from this head.js
file can only return certain limited tags like <title>
, <meta>
, <link>
, and <script>
.
Route groups
Every folder inside the app
directory contributes to the URL path. But, it is possible to opt-out of it by wrapping the folder name inside of parentheses. All the files and folders inside of this special folder are said to be a part of that route group:
Server components
By default, all of the components created inside of the app
directory are React server components, leading to better performance due to a smaller bundle size. But, if we want to switch to the client component, we need to specify that with the use client
directive at the top of the file.
Hands-on with Next.js 13
Let’s experiment with all the new features in Next.js 13 by running through an example.
Project creation
First, we create a new Next.js project using Create Next App:
npx create-next-app next-13
cd next-13
Let’s run the bootstrapped code as is:
npm run dev
We are greeted with the familiar homepage:
The page and layout file
Let’s create a folder parallel to the pages
directory and name it app
. Create a layout.js
file inside of app
with the code below:
export default function Layout({ children }) {
return (
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Next.js</title>
</head>
<body>
{children}
</body>
</html>)
}
Create a page.js
file with the following code:
import '../styles/globals.css'
export default function Page() {
return <h1>Hello, Next.js!</h1>;
}
We’ve also imported the global.css
file to make use of the global styles that are already defined. The app
directory is still an experimental feature, so we need to set a flag in the next.config.js
file in order to use it:
module.exports = {
reactStrictMode: true,
experimental:{appDir: true}
}
Finally, we need to delete the pages/index.js
file, which will conflict with the file in the app
directory. With that in place, we can now run the dev server:
npm run dev
We see that the root route /
now shows the UI corresponding to the app/page.js
file:
Testing the layout
With that in place, let’s test how the layout file impacts the overall UI. First, we’ll write some CSS styles in a layout.module.css
file in the same directory:
.header {
width: 100%;
height: 50vh;
background-color: cyan;
text-align: center;
font-size: 2rem;
}
Next, we import those styles in the layout.js
file and add them to a div
inside the body just above the children:
import styles from './layout.module.css'
export default function Layout({ children }) {
return (
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Next.js</title>
</head>
<body>
<div
className={styles.header}
>From layout</div>
<div>
{children}
</div>
</body>
</html>)
}
The UI now looks like the following: Let’s add a new folder in the app
directory called second
. Create a file inside it named page.js
with the following code:
import '../../styles/globals.css'
export default function Page() {
return <h1>Second route!</h1>;
}
Navigating to the second route http://localhost:3000/second
loads the following UI: The layout file placed inside the app
directory is being shared by the page.js
in the same directory as well as the page.js
inside of the second
folder. You can accomplish any common changes that deal with the layout via the layout file.
Testing the error file
Next, let's check out the error.js
file. We’ll create a folder inside the app
folder; we'll name the folder breaking
and create separate page.js
and breaking.module.css
files:
'use client';
import '../../styles/globals.css'
import styles from './breaking.module.css';
export default function Page() {
return (
<div className={styles.component}>
<div>BREAKING</div>
<div>
<button onClick={(e) => console.log(e.b.c)}>
break this
</button>
</div>
</div>
);
}
At the top of the page, use client
tells Next.js to render this component as a client component, not a server component, which is the default. We're handling user input via the button component below:
.component {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
border: 2px solid black;
flex-direction: column;
}
.error {
background-color: tomato;
color: white;
}
With this CSS in place, the component looks something like the image below: Now, let’s create an error.js
file in the breaking
folder. error.js
will act as an error boundary in case any error occurs either inside this component or any components in its subtree:
'use client';
import '../../styles/globals.css'
import { useEffect } from 'react';
import styles from './breaking.module.css';
export default function Error({
error,
reset,
}) {
useEffect(() => {
// Log the error to an error reporting service
console.error(error);
}, [error]);
return (
<div className={styles.error}>
<div>ERROR</div>
<p>Something went wrong!</p>
<button onClick={() => reset()}>Reset error boundary</button>
</div>
);
}
Notice that this is also a client component. Two props are passed to this component: the error
prop provides more details about the error, and the reset
function resets the error boundary. This should be enough to contain the error only to the component and preserve the UI as well as the state of the rest of the application.
Testing the loading file
Next, we'll test the functionality of the loading.js
file. Let’s create one inside of the same folder with the following code:
export default function Loading() {
return <h1>Loading...</h1>
}
With that in place, we need to set up some navigation. Inside the second/page.js
we place a link to navigate to the /breaking
route:
export default function Page() {
return (<Link href="/breaking">navigate to breaking</Link>);
}
Upon clicking this link, we’ll see that before the breaking component gets mounted, the UI from the loading.js
file will appear for a split second:
Data fetching
Lastly, we'll explore how data fetching in Next.js 13 differs from earlier versions. All of the components inside the app
folder are server components by default.
Let's make the changes to the second.js
component to fetch random dog facts from the Dog Facts API:
async function getData() {
const index = Math.floor(Math.random()*10)
const res = await fetch(https://dog-facts-api.herokuapp.com/api/v1/resources/dogs?index=${index}`);
return res.json();
}
We'll call this function directly inside of our React component by making it async:
export default async function Page() {
const data = await getData();
return (
<p>
{data[0].fact}
</p>
);
}
The code above fetches the dog fact on the server side and displays it in our component:
Client and server-side rendering
Using the Fetch API natively inside the component provides us with the ability to cache and revalidate the requests as per our requirement. Therefore, the previous utils like getStaticProps
and getServerSideProps
can be implemented via just one API as seen below:
// Generates statically like getStaticProps.
fetch(URL, { cache: 'force-cache' });
// Generates server-side upon every request like getServerSideProps.
fetch(URL, { cache: 'no-store' });
// Generates statically but revalidates every 20 seconds
fetch(URL, { next: { revalidate: 20 } });
Conclusion
That wraps up almost all the changes that were introduced with the app
directory in Next.js 13.
Although at the time of writing, these new features are in beta and are bound to change slightly before being officially released, we can agree that they provide much more flexibility to configure our UI through the loading, error, and layout components. The simplicity of the native Fetch API on server components is also a great addition.
Here's the link to the code that we worked with. Feel free to explore!
LogRocket: Full visibility into production Next.js apps
Debugging Next applications can be difficult, especially when users experience issues that are hard to reproduce. If you’re interested in monitoring and tracking Redux state, automatically surfacing JavaScript errors, and tracking slow network requests and component load time, try LogRocket.
LogRocket is like a DVR for web and mobile apps, recording literally everything that happens on your Next app. Instead of guessing why problems happen, you can aggregate and report on what state your application was in when an issue occurred. LogRocket also monitors your app's performance, reporting with metrics like client CPU load, client memory usage, and more.
The LogRocket Redux middleware package adds an extra layer of visibility into your user sessions. LogRocket logs all actions and state from your Redux stores.
Modernize how you debug your Next.js apps — start monitoring for free.
Top comments (1)
I haven’t fully developed an application with nextjs, but I do like how they handle routes, the error handling when locating a page that doesn’t exist. I also read that it’s better pertaining to SEO. Great article. Thanks for sharing.