One of the biggest changes in my journey building nanoLabs is that my definition of "done" has changed.
Before, I would build a feature, test it myself and think:
It works.
Now I'm asking a much harder question:
Will it work when five different laboratories start using it?
That's a completely different standard.
nanoLabs is preparing for its first laboratory deployments, and that means I'm thinking less about adding features and more about reliability.
The focus right now is on the fundamentals:
- Role permissions and switching
- Test workflows
- Result validation
- Patient result updates
- Auditability
- Database performance
- Authentication
- Error handling
- User experience
A system can work perfectly with one test account and still expose serious problems when multiple users interact with it.
That's why I'm trying to approach this phase less like:
"What feature can I build next?"
and more like:
"What could go wrong when someone actually depends on this?"
That mindset changes how you test software.
You start thinking about edge cases.
You start questioning assumptions.
You start testing workflows instead of individual buttons.
And most importantly, you start listening to the people who will actually use the product.
My immediate goal is not to build the biggest laboratory platform in the world.
It's much simpler:
Get nanoLabs into five laboratories, learn from what happens, and make the product better from there.
Five laboratories will probably teach me more about building healthcare software than another hundred hours of coding alone.
So that's where I'm heading next.
Less guessing.
More testing.
More feedback.
More iteration.
And hopefully, the beginning of real-world traction.
Top comments (0)