“When bombs couldn’t break Pakistan — India tried to dry it.”
In the winter of 2019, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi stood before a cheering crowd in Haryana and declared, “Every drop of water that belongs to India will be stopped from flowing into Pakistan.”
The applause was loud. The implications louder.
It wasn’t the first time India had threatened to weaponize water. And as it turns out, it wouldn't be the last.
The River Beneath the Battlefield
India and Pakistan share the mighty Indus River system — a lifeline for over 220 million people. Under the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), brokered by the World Bank, the waters were divided: Pakistan was given rights over the three western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab), while India retained control over the eastern ones (Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej).
For decades, the treaty was hailed as a rare beacon of cooperation in a region otherwise marked by blood and borders.
But over the last decade, India has increasingly viewed the treaty not as a peace accord — but as leverage.
Dam by Dam, India Tightens the Grip
The shift from diplomacy to hydrological aggression began subtly.
In 2018, India inaugurated the Kishanganga Dam in Kashmir, diverting water from the Neelum River — a direct tributary of the Jhelum. Despite Pakistani protests and evidence that the project violated IWT provisions, India pushed forward, citing "national interest."
Then came the Ratle Dam, on the Chenab River. Despite Pakistan's legal objections and arbitration attempts, India once again steamrolled the process.
By 2025, India had initiated more than 60 dam projects across Jammu and Kashmir.
Each dam may look like a development initiative. But for Pakistan, it was the slow turning of a faucet — one that could choke its fields, cripple its agriculture, and incite internal displacement.
Weaponizing a Treaty
India has repeatedly used water as a pressure point during bilateral tensions. Following cross-border incidents or diplomatic breakdowns, Indian officials — including Prime Minister Modi — have issued public statements about "stopping Pakistan’s water."
These statements, though often dismissed as political rhetoric, reveal a deeper strategic posture. India is building infrastructure that enables future modulation of flows — legally ambiguous but functionally coercive.
Reports by Pakistan’s Indus Water Commission and international water law analysts have shown that India has manipulated seasonal releases, lowered flow volumes during critical crop cycles, and accelerated dam projects without proper treaty consultations.
The Psychology of a Silent War
Unlike missiles and bullets, water doesn’t explode. It disappears. Slowly.
When water from the Chenab doesn’t arrive in Punjab, farmers don’t hear a blast — they see cracked soil.
When flow from the Jhelum is diverted, children don’t run from sirens — they watch their schools shutter due to drought.
This is non-kinetic warfare, designed to destabilize without drawing global condemnation.
And India has become increasingly adept at it.
Legal Loopholes, Political Messaging
India defends its actions by exploiting ambiguities in the IWT. It claims that “run-of-the-river” projects are permitted, and that Pakistan is overreacting.
However, technical assessments by neutral experts have shown that certain dam projects — including Kishanganga — significantly alter river ecology and downstream availability.
India’s water infrastructure has become a messaging tool. Each dam becomes a dual-use instrument: development at home, disruption abroad.
Pakistan’s Pushback
Pakistan has repeatedly taken India to task via international forums.
Its Water Commission has submitted detailed objections to the World Bank and United Nations. Foreign Office briefings have laid out clear violations, citing reduced river flows and manipulated release schedules.
The World Bank, under treaty obligations, has attempted to mediate but has faced resistance and bureaucratic delay.
Pakistan, meanwhile, continues to build internal resilience — including canal realignments, water reservoirs, and legal countermeasures. But against India’s upstream control, there are limits.
The Bigger Game
This is not just about agriculture. It’s about geopolitics.
Control over water gives India a strategic non-military weapon. It can apply pressure on Pakistan during elections, military crises, or foreign negotiations.
In essence, India is turning rivers into bargaining chips.
And when questioned, it plays both victim and victor: "We have a right to our water," Indian officials say, while simultaneously framing Pakistan as ungrateful or uncooperative.
The Thirst for Control
As climate change tightens its grip on South Asia, water will become even more precious — and more political.
India has already shown that it sees water not as a shared right, but a strategic tool.
The bombs failed. The drones failed. But the dams? They may yet succeed.
The international community must recognize this new front of warfare. Because when rivers run dry in Pakistan, it won’t just be a national crisis.
It will be a global failure to stop a silent war.
Top comments (0)