DEV Community

Cover image for Why It's Better to Develop Frontend Only After the API Is Ready for Integration
Marie Berezhna
Marie Berezhna

Posted on

1

Why It's Better to Develop Frontend Only After the API Is Ready for Integration

When developing modern applications, many teams grapple with the question of whether frontend development should begin before the backend API is ready. While starting early might seem like a way to accelerate the process, it can often lead to inefficiencies and redundant work. Here’s why it’s generally better to wait until the API is ready for integration before diving deep into frontend development.

1. Avoiding Redundant Work

When frontend developers hardcode assumable data or rely on mock APIs, there’s a high likelihood that these assumptions won’t perfectly align with the final API structure. Once the real API is available, developers often need to rewrite substantial portions of the frontend code to match the actual endpoints, data formats, or authentication flows. This results in wasted effort and time that could have been spent on building and refining the application.

2. Ensuring Data Consistency

APIs dictate how data is structured and transmitted between the backend and frontend. By waiting for the API to be ready, frontend developers can ensure that their application consumes real, consistent data from the start. This reduces the risk of introducing errors caused by discrepancies between hardcoded mock data and actual API responses.

3. Minimizing Miscommunication

Without a ready API, frontend developers must often make assumptions about the backend. These assumptions can lead to miscommunication between teams, especially if there are no clear API contracts or documentation. This problem is compounded in larger teams where developers might work in parallel, leading to mismatched expectations and delays.

4. Realistic Testing and Debugging

Hardcoded data might work well for early prototypes, but it’s no substitute for testing against real API responses. By integrating with the API from the outset, developers can identify and address issues like incorrect data handling, API errors, or performance bottlenecks early in the process. This leads to a more robust and reliable application.

5. Streamlined Development Workflow

Frontend and backend development are inherently interconnected. When the API is ready, developers can follow a clear and structured workflow:

  • Fetch real data: Frontend developers can directly test and implement API calls without guessing the structure or format.
  • Build reusable components: Knowing the exact data structure allows developers to design components that can dynamically render data without needing future adjustments.
  • Optimize UI/UX: Real data often highlights design and usability considerations that are difficult to anticipate with mock data.

6. Focusing on High-Value Tasks

Instead of spending time creating and maintaining mock data, frontend developers can focus on tasks that add value, such as:

  • Designing and refining the user interface.
  • Enhancing user experience through animations and accessibility features.
  • Building modular and reusable components that are easy to integrate once the API is available.

7. Encouraging Cross-Team Collaboration

Waiting for the API to be ready fosters better collaboration between frontend and backend teams. By aligning their workflows, both teams can ensure that the API meets the frontend’s requirements and vice versa. This reduces friction, speeds up development, and results in a more cohesive product.

When Is It Okay to Start Frontend Development Early?

In some scenarios, starting frontend development before the API is ready might be justified:

  • When API contracts are finalized: If there’s a well-defined API specification (e.g., using Swagger/OpenAPI), frontend developers can confidently build components and data handling logic.
  • For prototyping: Early-stage projects or MVPs often benefit from quick mockups, even if they’ll need adjustments later.
  • With mock APIs: Tools like Postman or JSON Server can provide realistic mock data if the API’s structure is unlikely to change.

Conclusion

While there are exceptions, developing the frontend after the API is ready generally saves time, reduces redundant work, and ensures a smoother development process. By waiting for the API, teams can deliver a more polished and efficient application while avoiding the pitfalls of reworking significant portions of the codebase. Prioritizing synchronization between frontend and backend teams ultimately leads to better outcomes and a more cohesive development experience.

Image of Timescale

🚀 pgai Vectorizer: SQLAlchemy and LiteLLM Make Vector Search Simple

We built pgai Vectorizer to simplify embedding management for AI applications—without needing a separate database or complex infrastructure. Since launch, developers have created over 3,000 vectorizers on Timescale Cloud, with many more self-hosted.

Read full post →

Top comments (2)

Collapse
 
maksim_pokhiliy profile image
Maksim Pokhiliy

Great article! Totally agree that waiting for the API minimizes rework and improves integration. Unfortunately, deadlines and parallel development often make this hard in practice. Still, aligning teams and using clear API contracts is the way to go. Thanks for the insights! 🚀

Collapse
 
marie_berezhna profile image
Marie Berezhna

Thanks for your comment! Totally get it - real-world development rarely follows an ideal path, and deadlines often push teams to work in parallel. It can definitely be frustrating when API changes lead to rework.
Aligning teams early and using clear API contracts can help, but it’s not always easy in practice.
Glad you found the article useful!

Postmark Image

Speedy emails, satisfied customers

Are delayed transactional emails costing you user satisfaction? Postmark delivers your emails almost instantly, keeping your customers happy and connected.

Sign up