DEV Community

Cover image for Kubernetes Is Useful, but Only After These Basics Hurt
Mark Yu
Mark Yu

Posted on Edited on

Kubernetes Is Useful, but Only After These Basics Hurt

Kubernetes is not the first tool I reach for.

That may sound strange in 2026, but I still think many teams adopt Kubernetes before their deployment pain is real enough.

Kubernetes helps when you need orchestration. It hurts when you just wanted a place to run one container.

What Kubernetes Actually Gives You

Kubernetes helps manage:

  • container scheduling
  • restarts
  • scaling
  • service discovery
  • rollout strategy
  • configuration
  • workload isolation

The basic shape:

Deployment
   |
   v
ReplicaSet
   |
   v
Pods
   |
   v
Containers
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Most beginner confusion comes from mixing up those layers.

The Smallest Useful Deployment

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: api
spec:
  replicas: 2
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: api
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: api
    spec:
      containers:
        - name: api
          image: nginx:1.27
          ports:
            - containerPort: 80
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Apply it:

kubectl apply -f deployment.yaml
kubectl get pods
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This does not expose the app yet. It only runs pods.

Add a Service

apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  name: api-service
spec:
  selector:
    app: api
  ports:
    - port: 80
      targetPort: 80
  type: ClusterIP
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The service gives stable networking inside the cluster.

client -> service -> matching pods
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Pods can die and come back with different IPs. The service keeps the route stable.

The Debug Commands I Use First

kubectl get pods
kubectl describe pod <pod-name>
kubectl logs <pod-name>
kubectl get events --sort-by=.lastTimestamp
kubectl rollout status deployment/api
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

If a pod is stuck in CrashLoopBackOff, I look at logs first.

If it is stuck in Pending, I look at describe/events because it may be scheduling, resources, or image pulling.

Config and Secrets

Do not bake environment-specific config into images.

Use ConfigMaps for normal config:

apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
  name: api-config
data:
  LOG_LEVEL: "info"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Use Secrets for sensitive values, but remember: Kubernetes Secrets are not magic encryption by default. Treat cluster access seriously.

When Kubernetes Is Worth It

I would consider Kubernetes when:

  • you run many services
  • rollouts need control
  • autoscaling matters
  • workloads need scheduling
  • multiple teams share a platform
  • you already have observability

I would avoid it when:

  • one app can run fine on managed PaaS
  • nobody owns cluster operations
  • logs and metrics are weak
  • the team has no deployment discipline yet

Cloud-native 3.0 is making Kubernetes more platform-like, especially with internal developer portals and AI-assisted operations. Still, the fundamentals have not changed: a confusing cluster is not a platform.

Final Thought

Kubernetes is powerful because it standardizes operational patterns. It is painful because it exposes every weak operational habit your team already had.

What was your first Kubernetes failure: image pull, config, networking, or resources?

Top comments (0)