DEV Community

Cover image for Only one open-source project can be saved for future humanity. Which one would you choose?
Marplex
Marplex

Posted on

Only one open-source project can be saved for future humanity. Which one would you choose?

My answer? Git.

Top comments (21)

Collapse
 
ben profile image
Ben Halpern

Prrrrroooobably GNU/Linux, but I'd love to hear some more outside-the-box replies.

Collapse
 
rubyrubenstahl profile image
Ruby Rubenstahl • Edited

Linux, 100%

I'd love to have a more intersting answer, but it's essentially the foundation of most modern computing. Pretty much everything else I can think of, as important and useful as they may be, are things that could reasonably be rebuilt.

Linux was not inevitable and it's probable that such monumentally huge and complicated project would never be reproduced. It came out of a culture that was rooted very much in its time, and the momentum it gained was incredible. I think it will stand as a unique and wonderful anomaly in human history.

afterthought: Actually, I'm gonna go with Ben and say GNU/Linux. As pretentious as the copypasta rant Stallman went was, Linux as we know it wouldn't be what it is without the GNU project.

Collapse
 
darkwiiplayer profile image
𒎏Wii 🏳️‍⚧️

Those are separate projects. I'd go for the Linux kernel 100%; all the GNU stuff is easier to rebuild on top of it.

Collapse
 
phlash profile image
Phil Ashby

Whatever is required to read the GitHub arctic backup..

Collapse
 
darkwiiplayer profile image
𒎏Wii 🏳️‍⚧️

What's the point of being able to read a backup that's no longer there? 🤔

Collapse
 
phlash profile image
Phil Ashby

I was trying to cheat, assuming that a backup still existed, but I guess the question rules that out implicitly, in which case I choose a hard copy of Wikipedia...

Collapse
 
moopet profile image
Ben Sinclair

FizzBuzz.

Collapse
 
matthewsalerno profile image
matthew-salerno

TempleOS, I want to watch the world burn.

Collapse
 
jeremyf profile image
Jeremy Friesen

Gnu Emacs; you get a programming language and an extensible text editor.

But…I suppose you'll need an OS on which to operate, so Linux seems to be a pre-requisite.

Collapse
 
anuragvohraec profile image
Anurag Vohra • Edited

Linux. The rest can build on top of it always.
V8 Would also be in my list, right after Linux

Collapse
 
matiascarpintini profile image
Matias Carpintini

Rails :p

Collapse
 
karandpr profile image
Karan Gandhi

It's really problemtatic to choose one. But GCC probably.This way I would still be able to build free software on top of closed source OS.

Collapse
 
jonashdown profile image
Jon Ashdown

Neo4j. It can be used to make massive knowledge bases of linked data

Collapse
 
tinkermakar profile image
Makar

Linux 🖤

Collapse
 
gscacco profile image
Gianluca Scacco

Emacs

Collapse
 
luccabiagi profile image
Lucca Biagi

Maybe Vlang. I think that with this language the future humanity would be able to create nice new things!

Collapse
 
yvesnrb profile image
yvesnrb

It would have to be a general purpose programming language, so that we could rebuild the world from it. Maybe even LLVM so we could rebuild the languages themselves.

Collapse
 
sherrydays profile image
Sherry Day

Assuming the environments to do the computing and the such still exist I think I'd take Python.

Collapse
 
sovea profile image
Harley

A project that collects the "Hello World" in various languages.

And then, human makes the code world begin again.