DEV Community

Mike Young
Mike Young

Posted on • Originally published at aimodels.fyi

Paint by Inpaint: Learning to Add Image Objects by Removing Them First

This is a Plain English Papers summary of a research paper called Paint by Inpaint: Learning to Add Image Objects by Removing Them First. If you like these kinds of analysis, you should subscribe to the AImodels.fyi newsletter or follow me on Twitter.

Overview

  • Image editing has advanced with the introduction of text-conditioned diffusion models.
  • Seamlessly adding objects to images based on textual instructions without user-provided input masks remains a challenge.
  • The researchers leveraged the insight that removing objects (Inpainting) is simpler than adding them (Painting).
  • They curated a large-scale dataset of image-object removal pairs and trained a diffusion model to inverse the inpainting process, effectively adding objects into images.
  • The dataset features natural target images and maintains consistency between source and target images.
  • The researchers also utilized large Vision-Language and Language Models to provide detailed object descriptions and convert them into natural-language instructions.

Plain English Explanation

Image editing has seen significant progress with the development of text-conditioned diffusion models. However, one persistent challenge is the ability to seamlessly add objects to images based on textual instructions, without requiring users to provide input masks. The researchers behind this work realized that removing objects from images (Inpainting) is actually much simpler than the inverse process of adding them (Painting). This insight allowed them to develop an automated pipeline to curate a large-scale dataset of image-object removal pairs, which they then used to train a diffusion model to effectively "reverse" the inpainting process and add objects back into the images.

Unlike other image editing datasets, this one features natural target images rather than synthetic ones, and maintains consistency between the source and target images. To further enhance the capabilities of their system, the researchers leveraged large Vision-Language and Language Models to provide detailed descriptions of the removed objects and convert them into natural-language instructions. The resulting trained model outperforms existing systems both qualitatively and quantitatively, and the researchers have released the dataset and trained models for the community to use.

Technical Explanation

The researchers leveraged the insight that removing objects (Inpainting) is significantly simpler than its inverse process of adding them (Painting). This is attributed to the utilization of segmentation mask datasets alongside inpainting models that inpaint within these masks. Capitalizing on this realization, the researchers implemented an automated and extensive pipeline to curate a filtered large-scale image dataset containing pairs of images and their corresponding object-removed versions.

Using these image-object removal pairs, the researchers trained a diffusion model to inverse the inpainting process, effectively adding objects into images. Unlike other editing datasets, theirs features natural target images instead of synthetic ones, and it maintains consistency between source and target by construction. Additionally, the researchers utilized a large Vision-Language Model to provide detailed descriptions of the removed objects and a Large Language Model to convert these descriptions into diverse, natural-language instructions.

The researchers show that the trained model surpasses existing ones both qualitatively and quantitatively, and they have released the large-scale dataset alongside the trained models for the community to use.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several caveats and limitations in their work. For example, they note that the quality of the added objects may be influenced by the accuracy of the object removal process, and that the dataset may contain biases based on the selection of images and removed objects. Additionally, the researchers mention that their approach relies on the availability of high-quality inpainting models, which may not be readily available for all use cases.

While the researchers have made significant progress in addressing the challenge of seamlessly adding objects to images based on textual instructions, there are still opportunities for further research. For instance, exploring alternative approaches to object addition, such as leveraging generative adversarial networks (GANs) or other generative modeling techniques, could potentially lead to even more compelling results. Additionally, investigating ways to improve the consistency and realism of the added objects, as well as expanding the scope of supported object types, could further enhance the practical applications of this technology.

Conclusion

The researchers have made an important contribution to the field of image editing by developing a novel approach to adding objects to images based on textual instructions. By leveraging the insight that removing objects is simpler than adding them, they have curated a large-scale dataset of image-object removal pairs and trained a diffusion model to "reverse" the inpainting process, effectively inserting objects into images. The researchers' work showcases the potential of text-conditioned diffusion models for image manipulation and opens up new avenues for further exploration in this domain.

If you enjoyed this summary, consider subscribing to the AImodels.fyi newsletter or following me on Twitter for more AI and machine learning content.

Top comments (0)