Automating Authentication Flows with SQL: A Security Researcher’s Rapid Solution

In the fast-paced world of security research, time is often a critical factor, especially when evaluating authentication systems and their vulnerabilities. Recently, a security researcher faced the challenge of automating complex authentication flows for testing purposes under a tight deadline. Conventional scripting methods were too slow or too rigid, prompting a pivot toward leveraging SQL—inside the database layer—to streamline the process.

Understanding the Challenge
The core problem was to mimic user login sequences that involve multiple authentication steps, session handling, and token validation, all without waiting for the application's API responses during testing. The researcher needed a quick, adaptable, and powerful method to simulate these flows directly via the database.

The Solution: SQL as an Automation Tool
The key insight was that user-related data, session states, and tokens are stored in the database. By crafting targeted SQL queries, the researcher could simulate login procedures, session creation, and token exchanges seamlessly.

Let’s walk through some core concepts and example queries.

1. Simulating User Authentication
Assuming user credentials are stored securely in a users table, the researcher crafted queries to verify credentials and generate a session token.

-- Verify user credentials
SELECT user_id FROM users WHERE username = 'test_user' AND password_hash = 'hashed_password';

-- If valid, create a session record
INSERT INTO sessions (user_id, session_token, created_at)
VALUES (
    (SELECT user_id FROM users WHERE username = 'test_user'),
    md5(random()::text || clock_timestamp()::text), -- simple token generator
    now()
)
RETURNING session_token;

This approach lets the researcher programmatically create sessions, directly manipulating session state based on credential validation.

2. Mimicking Token Exchange and Validations
Authentication flows often involve issuing, validating, and revoking tokens. Using SQL, these steps can be executed rapidly.

-- Validate session token
SELECT * FROM sessions WHERE session_token = 'sample_token' AND created_at > (NOW() - INTERVAL '1 hour');

-- Revoke token
UPDATE sessions SET revoked = TRUE WHERE session_token = 'sample_token';

Performing such operations via SQL allowed for rapid iteration without dependency on external APIs, saving precious time.

3. Automating Multi-Step Flows
Complex flows requiring multiple condition checks and state transitions can be implemented within stored procedures, ensuring atomic operations and reducing error-prone scripting.

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION simulate_login_flow(username TEXT, password TEXT) RETURNS TEXT AS $$
DECLARE
    user_id INT;
    session_token TEXT;
BEGIN
    SELECT user_id INTO user_id FROM users WHERE username = username AND password_hash = crypt(password, password_hash);
    IF NOT FOUND THEN
        RETURN 'Invalid credentials';
    END IF;
    INSERT INTO sessions (user_id, session_token, created_at)
    VALUES (user_id, md5(random()::text || clock_timestamp()::text), now())
    RETURNING session_token INTO session_token;
    RETURN session_token;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

This encapsulates the login simulation in a single callable function, enabling rapid, repeatable tests.

Lessons Learned and Best Practices

• Speed and Efficiency: SQL-based automation minimizes network overhead, leveraging database operations directly.
• Flexibility: Stored procedures and dynamic queries allow quick adaptation to different scenarios.
• Security Considerations: While powerful, such methods should be restricted to testing environments with proper safeguards—never expose these techniques in production.

Conclusion
Using SQL to automate auth flows exemplifies how leveraging the underlying database can accelerate security testing and research—especially when faced with time constraints. This approach not only speeds up testing but also provides a fine-grained control over the authentication logic, enabling security researchers to uncover vulnerabilities more effectively.

By adopting these techniques judiciously, security professionals can enhance their testing capabilities and contribute to more robust, secure system architectures.

---

🛠️ QA Tip

I rely on TempoMail USA to keep my test environments clean.