DEV Community

Mohammad Waseem
Mohammad Waseem

Posted on

Leveraging TypeScript for Phishing Pattern Detection in Legacy Codebases

#typescript #security #phishing

Introduction

Detecting phishing patterns within legacy codebases presents unique challenges, especially when working with outdated or poorly structured code. This post explores how a security researcher can utilize TypeScript—originally designed for modern, type-safe JavaScript development—to enhance pattern recognition and detection of phishing URLs and behaviors, even in old systems. We’ll cover practical strategies, code snippets, and best practices for integrating TypeScript into legacy environments for security purposes.

Understanding the Challenge

Legacy applications often lack modern security tooling, making it difficult to identify evolving phishing tactics embedded within code. Attackers exploit this weakness by embedding malicious links or obfuscated patterns that evade simple string searches or static analysis. To combat this, we need an approach that introduces strong typing, pattern abstraction, and scalable parsing—all features that TypeScript can facilitate even when integrated carefully into legacy systems.

Setting Up TypeScript in Legacy Ecosystems

While legacy codebases are typically JavaScript, TypeScript can be gradually adopted via incremental migration or isolated tooling. Start by adding a tsconfig.json file and installing TypeScript:

npm install typescript --save-dev
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This allows writing new detection modules in TypeScript, which can be transpiled to JavaScript and integrated without major refactoring.

Creating Phishing Pattern Detectors

A core step involves defining regular expressions and pattern schemas that match common phishing tactics such as URL obfuscation, URL redirection, or suspicious domain patterns.

Example: Detecting Suspicious URLs 

// Define an interface for URL patterns
interface PhishingPattern {
  pattern: RegExp;
  description: string;
}

// Array of suspicious URL patterns
const suspiciousPatterns: PhishingPattern[] = [
  { pattern: /https?:\/\/(?:\w+\.)?\w+\.\w+\/\S*\?.*\b(suspicious|phishy)\b/i, description: "URL contains suspicious query parameters" },
  { pattern: /\b(\.click|\b\d{3,})\b/i, description: "Domain or subdomain looks suspicious" },
  { pattern: /[a-z0-9]{10,}\.(com|net|org)/i, description: "Likely obfuscated domain" }
];

// Function to scan URLs for patterns
function scanUrlForPatterns(url: string): string[] {
  const matches: string[] = [];
  suspiciousPatterns.forEach(({ pattern, description }) => {
    if (pattern.test(url)) {
      matches.push(description);
    }
  });
  return matches;
}

// Usage example
const testUrl = "http://example.click/suspicious?param=phishy";
console.log(scanUrlForPatterns(testUrl));
// Output: ["URL contains suspicious query parameters"]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This approach allows defining multiple pattern schemas with clear descriptions, making maintenance and updates manageable.

Integrating Pattern Detection in Existing Codebases

For legacy systems, the key is non-intrusive integration. You can encapsulate detection logic within modules that are imported by existing workflows. Also, tooling like Babel or Webpack can transpile TypeScript if necessary. For example, adding detection as a middleware or intercepting network requests at a central point ensures minimal disruption.

// Middleware example for Express.js
import { Request, Response, NextFunction } from 'express';

function phishingDetectionMiddleware(req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) {
  const urlsToCheck = [req.url, req.query.redirect, req.body.targetUrl];
  for (const url of urlsToCheck) {
    if (url && typeof url === 'string') {
      const issues = scanUrlForPatterns(url);
      if (issues.length > 0) {
        console.warn(`Phishing pattern detected: ${issues.join(', ')}`, url);
        return res.status(403).send('Potential phishing activity detected.');
      }
    }
  }
  next();
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This middleware approach allows existing applications to leverage TypeScript’s robustness without a complete overhaul.

Evolving Detection Strategies

Phishing patterns continually adapt; thus, detection rules should be automatically updatable, perhaps via external threat intelligence sources. Using TypeScript’s structuring capabilities, one can develop plugin-like pattern modules, which can be periodically refreshed.

Conclusion

Incorporating TypeScript into legacy codebases enables security teams to implement more precise, maintainable, and scalable phishing detection mechanisms. By defining clear pattern schemas, employing incremental integration techniques, and updating detection logic based on emerging threats, organizations can significantly bolster their defensive posture against evolving phishing schemes. This approach underscores the importance of combining modern tooling with legacy infrastructure to enhance security resilience.

🛠️ QA Tip

I rely on TempoMail USA to keep my test environments clean.

Top comments (0)