Mohammad Waseem

Posted on Feb 1

Optimizing Slow Database Queries with Docker: A Lead QA Engineer’s Approach Without Documentation

#docker #database #performance

Introduction

In high-performance software environments, slow database queries can become bottlenecks, affecting overall system responsiveness and user experience. As a Lead QA Engineer responsible for ensuring application efficiency, I faced the challenge of optimizing these sluggish queries using Docker, despite having little formal documentation or prior guidance on the existing setup.

This post sharing my approach aims to offer a systematic method that leverages Docker for environment consistency, while focusing on performance profiling and targeted query optimization. The goal is to deliver actionable insights that any QA or development team can adopt in similar situations.

Setting Up a Reproducible Environment with Docker

First, the importance of environment consistency cannot be overstated when addressing query performance issues. Docker provides an isolated, portable environment that ensures reproduceability across testing and staging.

Here's an example Dockerfile I used:

FROM postgres:13

# Install necessary tools for performance analysis
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y
    postgresql-contrib-13

# Copy custom scripts for query analysis
COPY analyze_queries.sql /docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/

# Set environment variables
ENV POSTGRES_DB=mydb
ENV POSTGRES_USER=user
ENV POSTGRES_PASSWORD=password

Using this container, I spun up a PostgreSQL environment mimicking production, facilitating performance testing directly.

Profiling Slow Queries

Since documentation was lacking, I relied on in-database tools for profiling. PostgreSQL's pg_stat_statements extension was instrumental:

CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS pg_stat_statements;

-- To analyze queries
SELECT * FROM pg_stat_statements ORDER BY total_time DESC LIMIT 10;

This command surfaces the most time-consuming queries, revealing hotspots.

Additionally, I enabled auto_explain for real-time explain plans:

SET auto_explain.log_min_duration = '500ms';
SET auto_explain.log_analyze = true;

This setup logs execution plans that exceed 500ms, providing insights into query behavior.

Iterative Query Optimization

With profiling data in hand, I targeted critical queries. For example:

SELECT * FROM orders WHERE created_at > '2023-01-01';

Turns out, missing indexes contributed heavily to latency.
I created a composite index:

CREATE INDEX idx_orders_created_at ON orders(created_at);

Post-creation, I reran the queries and noted performance improvements.

Continuous Monitoring and Validation

Since the environment was containerized, I automated tests with scripts to run typical query scenarios and log execution times. Using Docker Compose, I orchestrated a testing pipeline:

version: '3'
services:
  db:
    build: .
    ports:
      - "5432:5432"
  tester:
    image: my-test-image
    depends_on:
      - db
    command: sh run_tests.sh

This allowed brevity, reproducibility, and easy sharing with teammates.

Final Thoughts

While tackling slow queries without thorough documentation seems daunting, leveraging Docker for environment consistency and database performance tools for profiling proved invaluable. The key lies in a systematic approach—profiling, targeted indexing, testing, and iteration—that can be generalized across projects.

By sharing this method, I hope other QA engineers and developers can turn similar challenges into opportunities for learning and improvement.

🛠️ QA Tip

To test this safely without using real user data, I use TempoMail USA.

DEV Community