DEV Community

Mohammad Waseem
Mohammad Waseem

Posted on

Overcoming Geo-Restriction Testing Challenges in TypeScript Without Documentation

Overcoming Geo-Restriction Testing Challenges in TypeScript Without Documentation

In modern development environments, especially when dealing with geo-blocked features, testing becomes a complex puzzle. These features often rely on geographical signals, such as IP addresses or regional APIs, which can be difficult to simulate locally or in CI/CD pipelines. This challenge is compounded when lacking comprehensive documentation about the underlying mechanisms.

As a DevOps specialist, the goal is to ensure robust testing frameworks that can accurately emulate geo-restrictions, allowing seamless CI/CD workflows and reliable feature validation. This post explores how to leverage TypeScript—an increasingly popular choice for frontend and backend development—to overcome such obstacles without relying on explicit documentation.

The Challenge

Suppose you have a feature that displays content based on the user's region. The production environment detects the user's location via IP geolocation services or regional API endpoints. During testing, you need to simulate these signals to verify behavior without deploying to different regions or relying on an external API.

Without documentation, understanding how the system determines location can be tricky. You have to reverse engineer the request sequences, headers, or environment variables that influence this decision.

Approach: Dynamic Proxying and Mocking

The primary strategy is to intercept network calls or environment signals and manipulate them to mimic different geographical conditions. In TypeScript, especially on Node.js, this involves creating mocks, dynamically proxying requests, or overriding modules at runtime.

Step 1: Identify and Overwrite Geolocation Calls

First, pinpoint the API or service responsible for geolocation. It could be a fetch call, XMLHttpRequest, or server-side HTTP client.

// Example: Overriding fetch globally
const originalFetch = globalThis.fetch;

globalThis.fetch = async (input: RequestInfo, init?: RequestInit) => {
  // Determine if this is a geolocation request
  if (typeof input === 'string' && input.includes('geolocation')) {
    const fakeResponse = {
      region: 'US', // or dynamically set based on test case
    };
    return new Response(JSON.stringify(fakeResponse), {
      headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }
    });
  }
  return originalFetch(input, init);
};
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This override forwards all geolocation requests to a simulated response, effectively tricking the feature into believing it's in the specified region.

Step 2: Inject Regional Environment Variables

Many applications rely on environment variables to determine location-based behavior.

// Set environment variables dynamically in tests
process.env.REGION_CODE = 'EU'; // or 'ASIA', 'AFRICA'
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Ensuring your app reads these variables during startup or test initialization can help control regional logic.

Step 3: Modularize and Isolate External Services

If your codebase is well-structured, extract external dependencies so they can be stubbed or mocked during tests. Here's an example of dependency injection:

// Geolocation service interface
interface GeoService {
  getRegion(): Promise<string>;
}

// Actual implementation
class ApiGeoService implements GeoService {
  async getRegion(): Promise<string> {
    const response = await fetch('https://api.geolocation.com');
    const data = await response.json();
    return data.region;
  }
}

// Mock implementation
class MockGeoService implements GeoService {
  constructor(private region: string) {}
  async getRegion(): Promise<string> {
    return this.region;
  }
}

// Usage
const geoService: GeoService = new MockGeoService('ASIA');
// Pass this service instance during testing
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This pattern allows test environments to simulate different regions without changing production code.

Best Practices

  • Isolate External Calls: Decouple geolocation logic to facilitate mocking.
  • Use Dependency Injection: Enable injecting different implementations for testing.
  • Dynamic Runtime Patching: When documentation is unavailable, runtime patching of fetch or environment variables can be invaluable.
  • Leverage Test Containers: Use Docker or similar tools to simulate regional API responses if needed.

Final Thoughts

Solving geo-blocked feature testing in TypeScript without proper documentation requires a combination of runtime interception, environment manipulation, and modular design. While it may involve reverse engineering or exploratory coding, these strategies ensure reliable testing workflows, reduce deployment risks, and accelerate feature validation.

By implementing flexible mocking and dynamic patching, DevOps teams can create resilient testing environments that faithfully simulate real-world geographic scenarios, all while maintaining a streamlined development pipeline.


🛠️ QA Tip

To test this safely without using real user data, I use TempoMail USA.

Top comments (0)