DEV Community

Cover image for Building My First Real AI Agent with Hermes Agent
Mohansri Konathala
Mohansri Konathala

Posted on

Building My First Real AI Agent with Hermes Agent

Hermes Agent Challenge Submission: Write About Hermes Agent

This is a submission for the Hermes Agent Challenge

Building My First Real AI Agent with Hermes Agent

From Prompting to Autonomous Workflows

AI agents are everywhere right now.

But honestly, most tutorials made them feel either:

  • too abstract,
  • too complicated,
  • or just another wrapper around an LLM.

I wanted to understand what an actual agentic workflow feels like from a developer perspective.

That’s why I decided to experiment with Hermes Agent.

And for the first time, the idea of AI agents started making practical sense to me.


What Made Me Interested in Hermes Agent?

Most AI interactions today are still single-step.

You ask.
The AI responds.
Done.

But real-world workflows are rarely that simple.

A useful system should be able to:

  • reason,
  • plan,
  • use tools,
  • remember context,
  • and continue working toward a goal.

That’s where agentic systems become interesting.

Hermes Agent stood out because it focuses more on:

  • open agentic workflows,
  • modularity,
  • developer experimentation,
  • and practical integrations instead of just “chatbot experiences.”

It felt closer to building systems than just prompting models.


My Goal

I didn’t want to create a flashy demo.

I wanted to understand:

“What changes when AI moves from answering questions to completing workflows?”

So I experimented with a simple productivity-focused agent flow.

The idea was:

  1. User gives a task
  2. Agent breaks it down
  3. Agent decides what tools to use
  4. Agent processes information
  5. Agent returns a structured outcome

Simple in theory.

Very different in practice.


What I Learned About Agentic Systems

The biggest realization:

Agents are less about intelligence and more about orchestration.

That changed my entire perspective.

A strong agent workflow is really about:

  • context handling,
  • decision making,
  • memory,
  • execution flow,
  • retries,
  • and tool coordination.

The LLM is only one part of the system.

Hermes Agent helped make that architecture easier to visualize.


The Most Interesting Part: Tool Usage

This was probably my favorite part.

Instead of treating the model like a chatbot, the workflow becomes:

  • Understand task
  • Decide next action
  • Use appropriate tool
  • Analyze result
  • Continue reasoning

That loop feels fundamentally different from traditional prompting.

It starts feeling closer to:

  • autonomous workflows,
  • copilots,
  • developer assistants,
  • research agents,
  • or operational systems.

And that’s where things become exciting.


Challenges I Faced

Not everything worked perfectly.

A few things became obvious very quickly:

1. Context management matters a lot

Agents can drift if context becomes messy.

Maintaining structured information is critical.


2. Tool chaining is harder than expected

Even small workflow decisions can affect reliability.

A badly designed chain creates:

  • hallucinations,
  • repeated steps,
  • or unnecessary reasoning loops.

3. “Autonomous” still needs boundaries

One thing I appreciated while experimenting:

Good agent design is not about giving unlimited freedom.

It’s about creating:

  • controlled execution,
  • safe tool access,
  • and predictable outcomes.

That balance matters.


Why Open Agentic Systems Matter

This is the part that interested me the most philosophically.

We’re moving from:

  • AI as a responder

to:

  • AI as an active workflow participant.

That changes software design entirely.

Future applications may not just:

  • display interfaces,
  • store data,
  • or respond to clicks.

Instead, they may:

  • plan tasks,
  • coordinate tools,
  • automate workflows,
  • and adapt dynamically.

Open systems are important because developers can:

  • inspect behavior,
  • customize flows,
  • experiment safely,
  • and build domain-specific agents.

That openness accelerates learning.

Especially for students and independent developers like me.


My Biggest Takeaway

Before this, “AI agents” mostly sounded like a buzzword to me.

After experimenting with Hermes Agent, I finally understood the difference between:

  • chatting with AI,
  • and designing systems that can act.

That distinction is huge.

The future probably won’t belong to standalone models alone.

It will belong to ecosystems that combine:

  • reasoning,
  • tools,
  • memory,
  • orchestration,
  • and developer control.

And I think Hermes Agent is pointing toward that direction.


Final Thoughts

This challenge pushed me to think less about prompts and more about systems.

That shift alone made the experience valuable.

I still have a lot to learn about:

  • multi-agent coordination,
  • memory architectures,
  • retrieval systems,
  • and autonomous execution pipelines.

But Hermes Agent made the space feel approachable enough to start experimenting seriously.

And honestly, that’s probably the best thing a developer tool can do.


Thanks for reading.

I’d genuinely love to hear:

  • how others are experimenting with AI agents,
  • what workflows you’re building,
  • and where you think agentic systems are heading next.

Top comments (0)