DEV Community

Cover image for Why Nextjs is Better Than Reactjs
Mohammad Tahzeeb Khan
Mohammad Tahzeeb Khan

Posted on

Why Nextjs is Better Than Reactjs

When it comes to building robust web applications, developers often have to choose between frameworks that seem to offer similar capabilities. Two of the most popular options for modern web development are React.js and Next.js. While React.js has been a go-to library for building component-based UIs, Next.js has emerged as a powerful framework built on top of React, offering extra features that make it a preferred choice for many developers. But why exactly do developers consider Next.js "better" than React.js for certain projects? Let's break down the advantages.


Next.js elevates web development by building on React’s core strengths, offering built-in server-side rendering, optimized performance, and simplified routing—making it the choice for creating fast, SEO-friendly, and scalable applications.


  1. Built-in server-side Rendering (SSR)
    React.js renders applications on the client side, which can lead to slow initial load times, especially on slower networks. Next.js, on the other hand, provides server-side rendering (SSR) and static site generation (SSG) out of the box. SSR and SSG enable faster load times and improve SEO performance, making it easier for search engines to index content. This makes Next.js an ideal choice for applications where performance and SEO are essential, like e-commerce websites and content-driven applications.

  2. Automatic Code Splitting
    With large applications, delivering a single JavaScript bundle can slow down performance. Next.js has automatic code splitting, meaning each page only loads the JavaScript it needs. This keeps pages lightweight, reducing loading time and enhancing user experience. React.js doesn’t have automatic code splitting by default; developers need to set it up manually, which can become time-consuming.

  3. File-Based Routing System
    One of the standout features of Next.js is its file-based routing system. Each file in the pages directory automatically becomes a route. For example, pages/about.js corresponds to the /about route. This structure makes it easy to create new routes without configuring any additional settings or third-party libraries. In React.js, routing is typically managed using React Router, which requires extra setup and configuration.

  4. API Routes and Backend Integration
    Next.js allows you to create API routes within the same project, simplifying backend integration. You can easily create serverless functions using the /api directory and handle server-side logic without needing a separate backend. React.js, by contrast, is purely a frontend library, and you need a separate server or API setup (e.g., with Node.js, Express, or another backend) to handle server-side logic.

  5. Optimized Performance with Image and Font Optimization
    Next.js includes built-in support for image optimization and font optimization, two critical factors for performance. The next/image component optimizes images automatically, providing responsive images in modern formats, lazy loading, and quality adjustments. Additionally, Next.js handles font loading to reduce layout shifts and improve page stability. In React.js, these optimizations would need to be handled manually or through third-party libraries, adding complexity to the development process.

  6. Better SEO Capabilities
    Because Next.js supports SSR, SSG, and incremental static regeneration (ISR), it makes achieving good SEO performance much easier than in React.js. React's client-side rendering approach can hinder SEO because search engine bots might not fully render JavaScript-heavy content. With Next.js, developers can generate static pages or render pages server-side to ensure content is readily available for search engine crawlers.

  7. Zero Configuration
    Next.js offers a zero-configuration setup for SSR, SSG, CSS support, image optimization, and code splitting, allowing developers to focus on building features without worrying about underlying setup details. React.js is highly flexible, but it requires additional configuration, especially for advanced features like SSR or integrating CSS modules.

  8. Enhanced Developer Experience
    Next.js makes development more straightforward with features like:

  • Automatic Refresh: Pages refresh automatically as you make changes.

  • Custom Document and App Support: Offers a clean way to set up custom HTML document structures and shared components for layouts.

  • Middleware Support: Control request and response handling without third-party integrations.
    In React.js, these capabilities often require installing and configuring multiple third-party libraries or custom code.

Conclusion
Both Next.js and React.js are powerful tools, but they serve different purposes. Next.js offers a more comprehensive solution for full-featured web applications by building on top of React’s component-based architecture. With features like server-side rendering, file-based routing, API routes, and image optimization, Next.js can help you develop high-performance, SEO-friendly applications quickly.

Ultimately, choosing Next.js over React.js comes down to the needs of the project. If you're looking to create a fast, scalable, and SEO-optimized web application, Next.js can help you get there faster with fewer dependencies and less manual configuration. For simpler applications where SSR and SSG aren't required, React.js remains a fantastic choice.

Top comments (0)