Build a Multi‑Tenant HRMS in One Day with Deep Research and AI First Vibe Coding

#llm #genairevolution #vibecoding #hrmssoftware

What if you could plan, prototype, and deploy an HR management system in < 24 hours? Thanks to vibe coding — an AI-first method where you describe what you want and the AI writes the code — the once-impossible now feels routine. Pair that with rapid, AI-driven market research, and a solo founder or CIO can sprint from idea to MVP before lunch turns cold.

Vibe Coding: AI-First Development at Lightning Speed

Vibe coding flips traditional software development: instead of writing syntax-heavy code, you explain your intent to an AI. Tools like Replit, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot respond by generating full-featured apps — including UI, APIs, and database structures.

For example, you could prompt:

“Build a multi-tenant HRMS with employee management, payroll, leave, and onboarding features.”

What does this speed look like in practice?

Consider a real example: we using cursor replit build a career referal portal (loopin.work) from scratch in a day and HRMS solution in 9hrs that originally would have taken weeks to code, going from concept to demo in under a workday .

AI-Powered Market Research in Minutes

Speed is worthless if you race in the wrong direction. Starting with AI-led research ensures you build the right product. Tools like ChatGPT can rapidly:

Result: a data-backed feature set — core HR, payroll, leave, self-service, multi-tenant admin — ready to feed the build phase.

sample prompt can be like:


Role & Scope
Act as a senior market-research analyst specializing in HRMS + Payroll for the Indian and U.S. markets.

Deliver a comprehensive competitive-research report that also defines the detailed scope of features an ideal next-generation HRMS should include. Do not draft a PRD.

⸻

① Market Landscape
 • Market size, CAGR, adoption drivers, regulatory catalysts.

② Competitor Matrix

Assess all major, mid-tier, and emerging providers (e.g., Keka, Zoho People, GreytHR, RazorpayX Payroll, Beehive, Spine HR, Qandle, Darwinbox, regional/niche players).
| Vendor | Core Modules | Pricing Model | Deployment | API Posture | India Compliance Depth | U.S. Compliance Depth | Strengths | Weaknesses |

③ Customer-Voice Analysis
 • Aggregate pain points & desired features from G2, Capterra, Play Store, etc.
 • Highlight unmet needs of SMEs & startups.

④ Gap Identification
 • Map recurring pain points to vendor shortcomings.
 • Prioritize gaps by impact & frequency.

⑤ Compliance Mapping
 • Indian multi-state: PF, ESIC, TDS, GST, Shops & Est.
 • U.S. federal & state: FLSA, FUTA, state taxes.
 • Note coverage gaps and certification shortfalls.

⑥ Integration & Ecosystem Review
 • Native / marketplace integrations (accounting, ATS, identity, payments).
 • Public API openness (spec, versioning, rate limits, docs).

⑦ Emerging Trends & Opportunities
 • AI/ML, mobile-first UX, embedded finance, self-service adoption, regulatory tech shifts.

⑧ Detailed Expected Feature Scope

Define the full feature set a best-in-class HRMS for SMEs/startups should deliver:
 • Core HR: employee master data, document vault, org charts, role-based access.
 • Payroll: India multi-state + U.S. payroll engine, automatic statutory updates, retro pay, arrears.
 • Leave & Attendance: geo-fenced clock-in/out, biometric/device sync, configurable holiday calendars.
 • Recruitment & Onboarding: job posting, applicant tracking, e-offer letters, digital KYC.
 • Performance & OKR: 360° reviews, goal cascading, competency libraries, continuous feedback.
 • Expense & Reimbursements: policy-driven approvals, OCR for receipts, mileage tracking.
 • Benefits Administration: insurance enrolment, flexi-benefits, statutory deductions.
 • Analytics & Reporting: workforce dashboards, predictive attrition, payroll variance alerts.
 • Employee Self-Service: mobile payslips, leave requests, real-time attendance, chatbot.
 • Multi-Tenant Admin: tenant isolation, white-label branding, per-tenant compliance configs.
 • Security & Compliance: data encryption, audit logs, GDPR-style controls, SOC 2 readiness.
 • Public APIs & Webhooks: CRUD for HR entities, payroll runs, event hooks, sandbox keys.
 • DevOps & Scalability: containerised microservices, auto-scaling, zero-downtime releases.

⑨ Recommendations

Summarise the highest-value gaps and opportunities for a new entrant aiming to outclass current offerings.

⸻

Output Guidelines
 • Use Markdown headers and nested bullet points.
 • Provide data-backed insights; cite review sources where relevant.
 • Keep language precise and actionable.
 • No speculative PRD or wireframes—focus on research and feature scope only.

In seconds, you have a blueprint of what to build. ChatGPT can even help develop user personas (e.g. HR manager, employee, executive) and their needs , so you know which features to prioritize for each user type. All this research would normally require reading whitepapers, doing customer interviews, and compiling notes — now it’s accelerated via AI. (Of course, one should validate AI-generated research with real user input eventually, as ChatGPT can hallucinate details . But as a starting point, it’s a huge productivity boost.)

From Research to Requirements in 15min: Generating a PRD with AI

Armed with market insights and a features list, the next step is to define your product — essentially, writing a Product Requirements Document (PRD) or similar spec. For a multi-tenant HRMS, this PRD would outline the system’s modules, user stories, UX expectations, and technical needs (e.g. data isolation for tenants, integration points). Writing a detailed PRD can be tedious and time-consuming. Here again, AI comes to the rescue.

ChatGPT (or other LLMs) can be used to draft comprehensive PRDs in minutes, as long as you provide the necessary context and detail (Previous deep research response) .

Use a structured template and let the LLM fill in:

Collect inputs (product name, target users, key pain points, must-have modules, compliance regions).
Generate PRD with sections for vision, goals, functional & non-functional requirements, module-wise specs, API & integration needs, security, roadmap.
Review & refine — ask the AI to flag missing edge cases (e.g., contractor payroll, regional holiday calendars).

A task that once burned half a week now fits between meetings.

For example, you might start with:

🧩 Prompt Template: Generate Detailed PRD

⸻

Step ❶ — COLLECT INPUTS (Ask these one at a time):

Please answer the following six questions to help generate a complete Product Requirements Document:
 1. Product or Platform Name:
 2. What does it do? (Short, clear description)
 3. Primary users or customer segments:
 4. Core problems it solves or major pain points:
 5. Key features/modules you envision:
 6. Target regions and compliance expectations (if any):

Optional (ask only if relevant):
• Preferred tech stack
• Delivery formats (web, mobile, desktop)
• Must-have integrations or data flows
• Competitive products for benchmarking

⸻

Step ❷ — PRD STRUCTURE

Once all the above inputs are provided, generate a full PRD with the following structure using markdown formatting:

⸻

📘 Product Requirements Document (PRD)

1. Overview

Short summary of what the product is and the context for its development.

2. Product Vision

What the product aspires to achieve and how it fits into a broader business goal.

3. Key Goals
 • Business goals
 • User goals
 • Technical objectives

4. Functional Requirements

Brief summary of what the system must do. Reference modules for details.

5. Module-wise Breakdown

[Module Name]

Purpose:
Core Functions:
 • [Feature Name]: [What it does]
 • …
Workflows:
 • Step-by-step user journey or UI flow
User Roles Involved:
 • [e.g., Admin, HR, End User]
Integration Points:
 • APIs, Data imports, 3rd-party systems
Compliance Requirements (if any):
 • [e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, CBSE]

Repeat for all key modules: HR, CRM, Analytics, Onboarding, etc.

6. Technical Requirements
 • Tech stack (Frontend, Backend, Database, Cloud)
 • Hosting & Scalability considerations

7. Mobile / Web Capabilities

If delivery includes specific platform requirements.

8. API & Integrations
 • External systems to integrate
 • Data flow design
 • Authentication & authorization considerations

9. Data Security & Compliance
 • Encryption, audit trails
 • Role-based access
 • Regulatory adherence

10. Non-Functional Requirements
 • Performance
 • Availability
 • Maintainability
 • Localization

11. Support, Deployment, and Onboarding
 • DevOps expectations
 • User training
 • Documentation & support flow

12. Optional Add-ons & Innovations

Features planned for future or stretch goals

13. Compliance Matrix (if applicable)
 • [Requirement] → [Feature] → [Verification Method]

14. High-Level Roadmap
 • Q1:
 • Q2:
 • Q3:
 • Q4:

⸻
Step ❸ — FORMAT RULES
 • Use Markdown formatting
 • Maintain clear headers, bullet points, and bold labels
 • Keep functional requirements specific and measurable
 • Avoid trailing notes — make output clean and presentation-ready
 • All modules must follow the Module Template structure in Step ❷

The result is a structured document covering everything from the product vision to specific requirements. AI-generated PRDs ensure you don’t forget critical sections (templates enforce standard practice) and can reduce the back-and-forth in defining features . While a human PM should review and adjust the tone or fill any gaps, this approach drastically cuts down the time needed to produce a thorough requirements document.

AI can even help refine the PRD by identifying edge cases you missed. For instance, after drafting, you might ask: “ChatGPT, review this PRD draft and suggest if any key scenarios or edge cases are missing.” It could remind you handling of part-time contractors in payroll, or regional holiday calendars in leave management — details that improve the spec. This iterative AI-assisted planning ensures you have a solid game plan before writing any code.

Rapid Prototyping: Building the HRMS in < 24 Hours

With a clear PRD in hand (thanks to AI), you’re ready to build. Here’s where vibe coding truly shines: turning that document into a working prototype the same day. The development process with AI assistance looks very different from traditional coding:

Our own team used this flow to ship Loopin.work (a referral platform) in a day and an HRMS prototype in nine hours.

Start with Scaffolding: Using an AI-enabled IDE like Replit, you begin by describing the project setup and the RFP generated.

Replit’s Agent would interpret this and generate the initial version — an implementation plan which when verified continues to create the project structure, database schema, CRUD APIs and even the UI for the entire users. In a traditional environment, setting up a multi-tenant architecture (user and tenant models, relationships, auth) and configuring the dev environment could take several hours; the AI can do it in minutes.

Implement/Finetune Features via Chat-Driven Development: Next, tackle features one by one by testing and prompting the AI on specific issues. For instance: “Leave request Manager approval flow seems to be not taking into consideration the auto approval requirement if the Manager has not responded for the request post the day of the leave (Default grant is quota available)” The AI will generate the components for the form and manager dashboard, plus the corresponding API endpoints complete with business logic. In vibe coding, you’re essentially pair-programming with the AI — it writes the code as you describe the functionality, often filling in sensible defaults. You can then refine by saying, for example, “Now add a notification email when a leave request is approved”, and it will modify the code accordingly.
Real-time Preview and Iteration: Platforms like Replit let you run and preview the app instantly in the browser. After the AI generates a module, you can test it out. Suppose you see the leave request form and want a tweak (say, add a datepicker or make a field required) — you simply tell the AI to make that change. This conversational, iterative loop continues for each feature. It’s coding by collaboration: “build this… now adjust that… now fix this bug…” until the feature aligns with your expectations. As one vibe coder described, “I was happily inventing new features and telling the AI to fix each bug I encountered” — a far cry from slogging through compiler errors alone.
Multi-Tenancy and Security: For an HRMS, multi-tenancy is crucial. You’d ensure (and verify) that the AI’s code isolates data by tenant — e.g. queries always filter by tenant ID, and auth tokens tie users to their tenant. You might explicitly prompt: “Ensure that no user can access data from another tenant. Implement middleware to check the authenticated user’s tenant ID against requested resources.” Modern AI coding assistants are aware of common patterns and can implement such safeguards. (It’s still wise to review for security holes, but the heavy lifting of writing repetitive validation code can be offloaded to AI.)
UI/UX and Polishing: After core features, you can ask the AI to help polish the interface — “Make the dashboard more visually appealing with a chart of employee headcount over time” — and it could integrate a chart library. Or “Add a dark mode toggle for the UI” and watch it modify CSS/theme logic accordingly. Many vibe coding tools allow visual adjustments through AI as well (e.g. highlight a button and say “make it blue and larger”). The result is not just functional but starts to look like a cohesive product, all within hours of starting the project.
One-Click Deployment: Finally, deploying the app for real-world access is often trivial on these platforms. Replit, for example, has built-in deployment — you can host the app at a URL with a click . This means by the end of the day, your HRMS prototype is live online , ready to be demoed to stakeholders or tested by a pilot customer.

It’s worth pausing to appreciate what just happened. In one day, an individual using AI tools can accomplish what a team might have taken weeks: market research → spec → code → deploy. As noted by one Reddit user, using Replit’s AI, applications that would take a week or so before were built in a few hours . And Replit’s team themselves claim their Agent can automate “up to 90% of the foundational code” for typical projects . This frees you to focus on the 10% that truly require human insight — the unique business logic or creative UX touches that make your product special.

AI-First Development vs. Traditional Methods

It’s tempting to see AI-centric development as a silver bullet. Early adopters (startup founders, innovative CIOs) should understand both the advantages and the trade-offs compared to traditional development:

Use vibe coding for rapid validation and internal tools; refactor or harden for long-term, enterprise-grade products.

Speed and Agility: The obvious win is sheer speed. An AI-first approach can condense months of work into days . This allows for rapid experimentation — you can build a throwaway MVP to test an idea without heavy investment. For a founder, that means more shots on goal with limited runway. For a CIO, that means internal tools or prototypes for new initiatives can be tried quickly without lengthy IT projects. In traditional dev, “time to first demo” might be weeks; with vibe coding it might be hours.
Lower Barrier to Entry: Vibe coding dramatically lowers the skill threshold to create software . Non-engineers or beginner coders can contribute much more directly. Instead of needing fluency in programming languages and frameworks, they just need to articulate what they want. This can empower product managers, designers, or domain experts to build tools themselves in a controlled sandbox. In contrast, traditional dev requires specialized talent for each layer of the stack (frontend, backend, DevOps, etc.). AI-first tools “enable non-developers to automate coding tasks, leading to more creativity and productivity” .
Iteration over Perfection: Traditional development often emphasizes upfront design — writing the perfect spec, planning architecture, then coding to that plan with disciplined syntax. AI-first development is more iterative and exploratory. You “vibe” your way to a solution, possibly trying multiple approaches quickly. This is a bit of a double-edged sword: it’s liberating creatively, but can result in messy code structure since the AI is focusing on making it work, not on elegance or long-term maintainability . For a quick MVP or prototype, that’s usually fine. However, if the project is to evolve long-term, one might need to refactor the AI-generated code (or even rewrite parts) to meet engineering best practices.
Quality and Oversight: Current AI coding tools are powerful but not perfect. They may produce code that runs but isn’t optimized, or occasionally introduce bugs/security issues that a human would catch. For example, there could be hidden technical debt or “frankenstein code” if you blindly accept everything the AI writes . Traditional dev, with experienced engineers, might produce more polished code from day one (albeit slower). The pragmatic approach many teams take is using vibe coding for prototyping and internal tools where speed > polish, and then hardening the code for production use after experimentation . As team’s using AI First usually notes, they experiment with vibe coding butship it to MVP or Beta but not production yet, being mindful of security and maintainability . Early stage founders might be okay shipping an AI-coded MVP to users, but enterprise CIOs will likely mandate a review cycle for compliance and robustness before a wide rollout.
Cost: There’s an interesting cost dynamic. On one hand, you might save money by achieving results with a smaller team (or a single builder) thanks to AI. On the other hand, some advanced AI tools or API calls have usage costs, and mistakes or inefficient prompts could incur cloud expenses. Still, for getting a product off the ground or automating a typically labor-intensive project, the cost-benefit heavily leans positive. One can prototype an HRMS without immediately hiring a full dev team — a huge boon for lean startups or budget-conscious departments.

In summary, AI-first development is not “set and forget.” It’s “describe and collaborate.” The human in the loop is still critical — to guide the AI, to make judgment calls, and to add the creativity and empathy for end-users that AI lacks. Think of vibe coding as having a supercharged junior developer who works at absurd speed. You wouldn’t let a junior dev architect your entire system without oversight, but you’d love for them to churn out 10,000 lines of code overnight for you to refine. That’s essentially what these tools offer: an acceleration, not a replacement. Used wisely, they let small teams punch far above their weight.

Best Practices for AI-Accelerated Builds

Anchor in real data. Combine AI analysis with select user interviews to ground truth.
Prompt precisely, iterate quickly. Clear instructions yield cleaner code; small tweaks avoid “franken-code.”
Automate tests. Ask the AI to generate unit & integration tests alongside features.
Review security & compliance. Manually audit multi-tenant boundaries, PII handling, and statutory calculations.
Refactor post-MVP. Treat AI output as a first draft; schedule clean-up sprints.

The Takeaway

If you can describe it clearly, you can prototype it today.

Deep research + vibe coding compresses the product lifecycle: idea → insight → PRD → deployment within a single workday. Early-stage founders gain more “shots on goal,” CIOs slash backlog, and small teams punch above their weight. AI won’t replace human ingenuity, but it obliterates the busywork barrier between vision and reality.

So, next time inspiration strikes — whether it’s a multi-tenant HRMS or the next big SaaS — open an AI-powered IDE, feed it a research-backed spec, and start vibing. Your MVP might be live before the pizza gets cold.

Sources: