DEV Community

Nishtha Singh
Nishtha Singh

Posted on

2

True Significance of Testing For Distributed Software

Distributed systems can be especially difficult to program, for a variety of reasons, i.e. right from designing to managing work and above all difficult to test. Now testing any normal system even under the best of circumstances means you are entitled to find bugs in your way. No matter how tongue-twisting it may sound, take all the standard issues, multiply them by multiple processes written in multiple languages running on multiple boxes, there is potential for a real disaster to occur.

As software testers, we often hear that tests are important. With the help of automated testing one can easily minimize the number of bugs released to production, helps prevent regression, improves code quality, supplements documentation, and makes code reviews easier. In a nutshell, it is the duty of a tester to save the business money by increasing system uptime and keeping developers working on new features instead of fighting fires.

Software Testing

Any software that is not run entirely on one computer is known as Distributed software. Almost all web applications are distributed software these days. Right from remote data stores, internal REST APIs to third-party APIs, content delivery networks etc are servers on which these applications rely on. Moreover, the concept of distributed software is something that presents new challenges and requires a thoughtful approach to software testing.

The following post discusses general strategies for testing distributed systems, i.e. End-to-End Testing

One of the common yet crucial pitfalls in the world of testing is to check input and output from a single system. Many professionals tend to overlook these kinds of issues and end up creating a lot of problems later. A simple distributed system comprises of three parts: one collects data, one collects all of the data into consistent messages and one that receives the data and stores it for later retrieval.

Simple Distributed SYstem

No matter how easily tests can be written for each component, things can go wrong from one end to another. Errors such as the order and timing of data arrival can be a bit tricky causing all sorts of bugs. In order to address the problem in a good way, one can easily think of making all components so that they can be run locally. By doing this, you will have a control over when instances of the system elements are brought up and shut down, which is difficult when the elements are spread across different machines. Apart from this, you can co-locate processes on the same box and run them in virtual machines which provides the same functionality as running them on the same machine.

Furthermore, you may also encounter scenarios in which you have access to only a single component of a distributed system. For example, you could be writing a third-party system that collates data from a variety of different sources to assemble data for a user. In such circumstances, Simulators turns out to be one of the most valuable tools that could help in developing as well as debugging system components. However, I personally would like to advise you to be aware of their limitations and don't rely on them too heavily.

Conclusion

I hope the strategies outlined in this article might provide some help in testing systems more effectively.

Image of Timescale

🚀 pgai Vectorizer: SQLAlchemy and LiteLLM Make Vector Search Simple

We built pgai Vectorizer to simplify embedding management for AI applications—without needing a separate database or complex infrastructure. Since launch, developers have created over 3,000 vectorizers on Timescale Cloud, with many more self-hosted.

Read full post →

Top comments (0)

Image of Docusign

🛠️ Bring your solution into Docusign. Reach over 1.6M customers.

Docusign is now extensible. Overcome challenges with disconnected products and inaccessible data by bringing your solutions into Docusign and publishing to 1.6M customers in the App Center.

Learn more