Building Secure Rust Applications with Ring: Memory-Safe Cryptography for Modern Developers

#programming #devto #rust #softwareengineering

As a best-selling author, I invite you to explore my books on Amazon. Don't forget to follow me on Medium and show your support. Thank you! Your support means the world!

Let’s talk about building something secure. When you write code that handles secrets—passwords, financial data, private messages—you can’t afford mistakes. For a long time, this was a daunting task. Cryptography is a field where a tiny slip, something as simple as a misplaced byte or a timing difference, can break everything. I used to approach this with caution, knowing the tools I relied on were powerful but also fragile.

Then I found Rust, and more specifically, a crate called Ring. It changed my perspective. Rust gives you a language that stops entire categories of errors before your code even runs. The Ring crate builds on that, offering the cryptographic pieces you need, but built with a safety-first mindset. It’s like being given a set of precision instruments that also have guardrails.

Why does this matter? Let’s rewind. Many of the cryptographic libraries that power the internet are written in C. C is powerful and fast, but it trusts the programmer completely. It’s easy to accidentally leave a door unlocked. A buffer overflow here, a memory leak there—these can become gaps where secrets slip out. Furthermore, cryptography has a hidden enemy: time. Even how long your code takes to compare two numbers can leak information. These are called side-channel attacks.

Ring is built differently. Its core is written with Rust’s strict rules about memory. The compiler ensures you don’t access memory you shouldn’t. This removes whole classes of vulnerabilities by design. For the parts that are still in C, like some highly optimized math routines, they are small, focused, and heavily reviewed. More importantly, Ring’s algorithms are constant-time. They are carefully crafted so their execution time doesn’t depend on the secret data they are processing. This closes those side-channel doors.

So, what can you actually do with it? Nearly all the fundamental operations you’d need. Need to create a cryptographic hash of some data to verify it hasn’t been tampered with? Ring provides SHA-256, SHA-512, and others. Need to generate a random number that’s truly unpredictable for creating keys? It has a secure random number generator. Digital signatures, encryption, key exchange—it’s all there.

Let’s start with something simple: generating a random number. In cryptography, you can’t just use any random function. You need randomness that is unpredictable and secure. Ring makes this straightforward.

use ring::rand;

fn get_secure_random() -> Result<[u8; 32], ring::error::Unspecified> {
    let rng = rand::SystemRandom::new();
    let mut random_bytes = [0u8; 32]; // Let's get 32 random bytes
    rng.fill(&mut random_bytes)?;
    Ok(random_bytes)
}

This SystemRandom uses the operating system’s secure randomness source. On Linux, it might read from /dev/urandom. The fill method either succeeds or returns an error. There’s no hidden failure mode where you get bad randomness.

Now, let’s say you’re building a user authentication system. You should never store passwords directly. Instead, you store a hash of the password. When the user logs in, you hash what they type and compare it to the stored hash. But a simple hash isn't enough anymore; attackers use pre-computed tables called "rainbow tables." You need to add a unique salt and use a deliberately slow function. This is called password hashing.

Ring provides a mechanism for this. While it doesn’t have a one-function solution like some libraries, it gives you the primitive to build a robust one: PBKDF2 (Password-Based Key Derivation Function 2).

use ring::{digest, pbkdf2};
use std::num::NonZeroU32;

fn hash_password(password: &str, salt: &[u8]) -> Vec<u8> {
    let iterations = NonZeroU32::new(100_000).expect("Non-zero iteration count");
    let mut derived_key = vec![0u8; digest::SHA256.output_len]; // Output will be 32 bytes

    pbkdf2::derive(
        pbkdf2::PBKDF2_HMAC_SHA256,
        iterations,
        salt,
        password.as_bytes(),
        &mut derived_key,
    );

    derived_key
}

fn verify_password(password: &str, salt: &[u8], stored_hash: &[u8]) -> bool {
    let iterations = NonZeroU32::new(100_000).unwrap();
    pbkdf2::verify(
        pbkdf2::PBKDF2_HMAC_SHA256,
        iterations,
        salt,
        password.as_bytes(),
        stored_hash,
    ).is_ok()
}

Notice the NonZeroU32 for the iteration count. This is a Rust type that ensures the number is never zero. A zero iteration count would be a security disaster, and Rust’s type system helps us prevent that logical error at compile time. The salt should be a unique, random value for each password. You would store both the salt and the derived hash.

Digital signatures are another cornerstone. They allow you to verify the authenticity and integrity of data. For example, you can sign a software update. When a user’s device downloads the update, it can use your public key to verify the signature, ensuring the update truly came from you and wasn’t modified in transit.

Ring supports modern algorithms like Ed25519, which is fast and secure. Here’s how you generate a key pair and sign a message.

use ring::{rand, signature};
use ring::signature::KeyPair;

fn sign_a_message() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
    // Step 1: Get a secure random number generator.
    let rng = rand::SystemRandom::new();

    // Step 2: Generate a private/public key pair in PKCS#8 format.
    let pkcs8_bytes = signature::Ed25519KeyPair::generate_pkcs8(&rng)?;

    // Step 3: Create a key pair object from those bytes.
    let key_pair = signature::Ed25519KeyPair::from_pkcs8(pkcs8_bytes.as_ref())?;

    // This is your public key. You can share it freely.
    let public_key_bytes = key_pair.public_key().as_ref();

    // Step 4: Sign your message.
    let message = b"Critical system update v2.1";
    let signature = key_pair.sign(message);

    // At this point, you would distribute:
    // 1. The message.
    // 2. The signature.
    // 3. Your public key.
    // The verifier needs all three.

    // Step 5: Verification (usually done by the other party).
    let peer_public_key = signature::UnparsedPublicKey::new(
        &signature::ED25519,
        public_key_bytes,
    );
    let verification_result = peer_public_key.verify(message, signature.as_ref());

    match verification_result {
        Ok(()) => println!("Signature is valid. Update is authentic."),
        Err(_) => println!("DANGER: Signature verification failed!"),
    }

    Ok(())
}

The flow here is important. The pkcs8_bytes contain the private key. You must keep this absolutely secret. The key_pair object lets you sign. Verification, however, only requires the public key. The separation is clean and enforced by the API.

People often ask how Ring compares to something like OpenSSL. OpenSSL is a giant. It’s a vast library that does everything, and its history includes some severe security issues, like Heartbleed. This isn’t to disparage the maintainers; it’s a consequence of complexity in a language like C.

Ring takes a different path. It focuses on providing a smaller, safer set of core algorithms. Where OpenSSL might give you a dozen ways to do something, some of them outdated and insecure, Ring offers a curated selection of modern, robust implementations. Its safety isn’t just hope; it’s structured. The Rust parts are memory-safe. The API is designed to guide you toward correct usage.

For instance, consider key agreement, like the Diffie-Hellman exchange. Two parties can compute a shared secret over an insecure channel without an eavesdropper being able to figure it out. Doing this correctly is tricky. You must use the right curves and avoid pitfalls.

use ring::agreement;
use ring::rand::SystemRandom;

fn perform_key_exchange() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
    let rng = SystemRandom::new();

    // Generate my private/public key pair.
    let my_private_key = agreement::EphemeralPrivateKey::generate(&agreement::X25519, &rng)?;
    let my_public_key = my_private_key.compute_public_key()?;

    // In reality, I would send `my_public_key` to the other party,
    // and receive their public key.
    // Let's simulate the other party generating their keys.
    let their_private_key = agreement::EphemeralPrivateKey::generate(&agreement::X25519, &rng)?;
    let their_public_key = their_private_key.compute_public_key()?;

    // Now, I compute the shared secret using my private key and their public key.
    let my_shared_secret = agreement::agree_ephemeral(
        my_private_key,
        &agreement::UnparsedPublicKey::new(&agreement::X25519, their_public_key.as_ref()),
        ring::error::Unspecified,
        |key_material| {
            // This closure receives the key material. We must copy it out.
            let mut secret = vec![0u8; 32];
            secret.copy_from_slice(key_material);
            Ok(secret)
        },
    )?;

    println!("Shared secret computed successfully.");
    // `my_shared_secret` is now a Vec<u8> containing the agreed-upon key.
    // The other party would perform the symmetric calculation with their private key and my public key.

    Ok(())
}

The API uses an ephemeral key pattern by default, which is more secure for many protocols. The secret is handed to you inside a closure, which helps control where that sensitive data lives in memory. This is the kind of thoughtful design that prevents mistakes.

Performance is critical in cryptography. If it’s too slow, developers will be tempted to turn it off or use weaker alternatives. Ring is built to be fast. It uses assembly-level optimizations and hardware acceleration where possible. If your CPU has AES-NI instructions for encryption, Ring will use them. This means you get safety without sacrificing the speed needed for real-world systems.

Where is Ring used? You’ll find it in web servers using the Rustls TLS library, which is a cleaner, safer alternative to OpenSSL. It’s in package managers for verifying downloaded crates or modules. It’s in secure messaging apps. It forms a trusted base for systems where failure is not an option.

Working with Ring has taught me a valuable lesson. Security doesn’t have to feel like walking a tightrope without a net. By using tools that are designed from the ground up to prevent common errors, you can focus on what your application needs to do. You think less about avoiding memory bugs and more about your protocol design.

The Rust ecosystem builds on this foundation. Crates like Rustls handle the complexity of TLS protocols, using Ring for the raw cryptography. This layered approach means you rarely need to touch the primitives directly. You can work at the level of your problem—"secure this connection," "sign this file"—and trust that the layers below are solid.

In the end, building secure systems is about reducing risk. Every line of code is a potential for error. Ring, powered by Rust’s guarantees, dramatically reduces the potential for error in the most critical parts of your code: the parts that guard secrets. It allows you to write software that is not only functional but also resilient. For me, that’s a shift from hoping my code is secure to having a strong reason to believe it is. And in the world of software, that confidence is everything.

📘 Checkout my latest ebook for free on my channel!

Be sure to like, share, comment, and subscribe to the channel!

101 Books

101 Books is an AI-driven publishing company co-founded by author Aarav Joshi. By leveraging advanced AI technology, we keep our publishing costs incredibly low—some books are priced as low as $4—making quality knowledge accessible to everyone.

Check out our book Golang Clean Code available on Amazon.

Stay tuned for updates and exciting news. When shopping for books, search for Aarav Joshi to find more of our titles. Use the provided link to enjoy special discounts!