The hype surrounding MCP (Model Context Protocol) has arguably gone too far. Since Anthropic unveiled this protocol, many in the industry have become restless, acting as if they won’t secure a ticket to the AI era unless they rewrite their business interfaces as MCP Servers overnight.
Every few years, the tech world is swept by a hurricane of "unified protocols" (much like a few years ago when everyone rushed to dismantle monoliths into microservices). The essence of architecture is solving problems, not chasing an expensive sense of ritual. Forcing every business function into MCP is not just strategic laziness; it is tactical self-torture. For developers deeply rooted in real-world business logic, the Skill Pattern is the true path to clarity.
I. The Deification of MCP: Ritual Should Not Outweigh Productivity
We must admit that the intention behind MCP is good; it attempts to establish a universal "dialogue logic" between heterogeneous systems and AI Agents. Enterprises are flocking to it because they hope a standardized protocol will once and for all solve the problem of connecting AI to internal private data.
However, in the eyes of senior architects, "standardization" is often a smokescreen for over-engineering. Consider our core requirement: we simply want the AI to smoothly call an inquiry interface that has been running reliably for three years. To get this "sip of vinegar," MCP forces you to make a complex "feast of dumplings": you must set up a compliant Server, wrestle with intricate transport protocols, and map resources. This isn’t integration; it’s building a massive wall around your business system. Great architecture should dissolve into the background, not impose itself with overbearing "diplomatic formalities."
II. The "Three Mountains" of MCP Implementation
In a real production environment, MCP is far from the panacea it's advertised to be. It presents at least three hurdles that can mire a mature team in a swamp of technical debt.
1. The Curse of Development Cost and Dual Codebases
MCP requires a full protocol implementation. This means you must maintain not only your original business logic but also a separate "protocol translation logic." This isn't just a few extra lines of code; it means double the documentation, double the test cases, and a double breeding ground for bugs. For teams wanting AI to take over logic quickly, this "dual maintenance" is an architectural disaster.
2. Context Bloat vs. Token Consumption
This is MCP’s fatal weakness. Defining a large number of tools involves massive amounts of metadata and redundant descriptions. When an LLM tries to understand a tool list provided by an MCP Server, this verbose protocol text quickly chokes the Context Window. The result? A sharp spike in Token consumption and agonizingly long response latencies. In high-concurrency business scenarios, this waste is unacceptable.
3. The Mystery of Debugging Nightmares
With every layer added to an architecture, the system's entropy doubles. When an AI call fails, where do you look? Is it a "prompt drift"? A misconfiguration in the protocol layer? Or a failure in the underlying business logic? This bottomless path of troubleshooting is a nightmare that no veteran architect wants to face.
III. Why "Skills" Are the Soul of Business
Stepping away from heavy protocols, let’s look at what we call a Skill. In the design philosophy of Solon AI, a Skill is not a heavy contract, but an "elegant packaging of capability."
The core logic is simple: the business does not need to adapt to the protocol; the protocol should adapt to the business.
- Code as a Skill: A method you’ve already written perfectly, once annotated, becomes a Skill.
- Interface as a Skill: An existing Swagger/OpenAPI document, once imported, becomes a Skill.
- Data as a Skill: A database connection with read-only permissions becomes a Skill (Text-to-SQL).
This bottom-up evolution aligns with the natural laws of system development.
IV. A Dimensional Strike: Skill Practice in Solon AI
As a senior developer, I care most about the "Input-Output Ratio." Let’s see how Solon AI uses the Skill pattern to deliver a "dimensional strike" against the complexity of MCP.
Example 1: RestApiSkill — Activating Legacy Interfaces at Zero Cost
If you have a collection of REST interfaces, you don't need to write a single line of new code for them. In Solon AI, this is seamless:
// 1. "Take-ism": Directly read the business system's Swagger documentation.
// Just provide a URL, and the AI automatically parses all Paths, Methods, and parameter descriptions.
RestApiSkill orderSkill = new RestApiSkill("http://api.yoursite.com/v2/api-docs", "http://api.yoursite.com");
// 2. Drop it into the Agent; it becomes a "Business Expert" instantly.
ReActAgent agent = ReActAgent.of(chatModel)
.role("Order Manager")
.defaultSkillAdd(orderSkill) // Injecting the Skill
.build();
// 3. The AI now knows how to check inventory, place orders, and update statuses.
agent.prompt("Has the order ending in 9527 been shipped?").call();
Example 2: Text2SqlSkill — Turning Data Directly into Reports
Previously, if a boss wanted a figure, you had to write a DAO, SQL, and a Controller. Now, you give the database capability directly to the AI:
// Connect to the database and tell it which tables it manages.
Text2SqlSkill sqlSkill = new Text2SqlSkill(dataSource, "users", "orders", "refunds")
.maxRows(50); // Security policy: return a maximum of 50 rows.
ReActAgent agent = ReActAgent.of(chatModel)
.role("Financial Analyst")
.defaultSkillAdd(sqlSkill)
.build();
// The AI reasons: "To check the total, I need to execute SUM(...)," then generates and runs the SQL.
agent.prompt("What was the total refund amount for the East China region last month?").call();
The contrast is clear: agent.defaultSkillAdd(...) is exponentially more efficient than developing a complex MCP node. This is true business-centric "dimensional strike."
V. Deep Dive: Architectural Advantages of the Skill Pattern
In terms of architectural selection, the Skill pattern wins on three fronts: Agility, Stability, and Reusability.
- Low Coupling (Agility): Skills can be local or remote. They attach to an Agent like plugins—unplug them at any time without hurting the core business.
- Strong Type Safety (Stability): By leveraging Java’s mature type system and JSON Schema validation, we can precisely control every parameter the AI passes. Unlike the loose messaging of MCP, the Skill pattern locks down risks before execution.
- High Reusability (Reusability): Once a Skill is written, it can be used in a simple ChatModel / SimpleAgent or called within a complex ReActAgent reasoning loop.
VI. Conclusion: Return to Engineering Essence, Choose Path Wisely
The true meaning of architectural design lies not in chasing the "newest" but in pursuing the "most suitable." By comparison, the Skill pattern offers a more pragmatic choice: it implements a seamless connection between business logic and Agents via lightweight packaging, ensuring every bit of computing power is spent on core business reasoning.
We need surgical precision and lightness. Abandon those cumbersome protocol translations and release your business potential with the Skill pattern. Remember: The best technology is the one you don't even feel is there.
Slogan: Business is King, Skill is the Path. Don't let protocols become the stumbling block to your AI era.
Top comments (0)