DEV Community

Cover image for Why Web3 Developers Need to Say Goodbye to Web2 Tooling
David Britt for Nosana

Posted on

Why Web3 Developers Need to Say Goodbye to Web2 Tooling

The Web3 ecosystem is still in its infancy, but it is clear that it will be a game changer. Decentralization is a revolutionary concept with the potential to create a fairer, more secure, and more equitable internet. But the problem is that many Web3 projects are still being built with Web2 technology and infrastructure, which goes against Web3's basic ideas.

Web2 is a business model

For more than two decades, Web2 has been the dominant force on the internet. It is a centralized, controlled, and monetized network dominated today by a select few tech companies. These corporations have complete control over your data, the flow of information, and the prices that you pay for access. This often results in the interests of users and developers being misaligned with those of big tech corporations. Additionally, we see exponential growth in data breaches, privacy violations, and malicious attacks. The result? A growing lack of faith in Web2 infrastructure. Web2 is nothing more than a business model for the large tech companies that keep us in a stranglehold. Pricing and availability of services are dictated by them, leaving developers at their mercy. And we're supposed to settle for high costs, limited access to resources, and decreased innovation.

One step at a time

We know achieving true decentralization is far easier said than done. It's not uncommon for developers, or people in general, to stick with what they know and are comfortable with. Web2 tooling has been around for a long time, and there is a wealth of resources and support available for it. Making the switch to Web3 can be daunting, and we feel many developers may still be unaware of the benefits. Furthermore, Web3 technology is still in its early stages, and many of the tools and solutions available are not as mature or user-friendly as their Web2 counterparts. Even for developers who understand the advantages of Web3, this can be a barrier to adoption.

Take Ethereum, for example. A popular platform for building decentralized applications (dApps), but most of its nodes and data storage are still hosted on traditional cloud computing architectures like Amazon's EC2 service. This means that all transactions occurring on Ethereum are still reliant on centralized infrastructure that can be potentially monitored by external actors, including cloud services for hosting their nodes and processing transactions. While this does make it easier for developers to get up and running quickly, it also reduces user privacy and puts them at risk of interference from external actors who may have access to the underlying infrastructure.

Shape the future with Nosana

Despite the challenges that lie ahead, the future of Web3 is dependent on developers starting to embrace Web3 tooling and solutions. By sticking with Web2, projects miss out on the opportunity to shape the future of Web3 and create a more equitable and secure internet. By embracing Web3 solutions, projects and developers can help drive the growth and development of these solutions and contribute to a better future for all. We believe we're building the ideal bridge for developers looking to transition from Web2 tooling to a trustless CI/CD solution for Web3, as our CI engine is fully integrated with GitHub and GitLab.

Nosana is here to help developers make this transition while also contributing to Web3's growth and development. So, say farewell to your Web2 tooling and hello to the future of Web3 development.


This article was initially posted on nosana.io/blog/smoke-testing on February 3, 2023

Top comments (2)

Collapse
 
jonrandy profile image
Jon Randy πŸŽ–οΈ • Edited

The obsession with blockchain in #web3 is insane, and is holding back development/uptake of far more interesting technologies that also facilitate a lot of the same ideals - without the ludicrous resource usage. In almost every project I've seen, blockchains are shoehorned in for no reason other than they're the latest buzzword, when the reality is that their use is generally over-engineering and inappropriate application of technology.

Collapse
 
djmbritt profile image
David Britt

Hi Jon, thanks for your comment.

Indeed, there have been a ton of projects out there, that have tried to profit from the hype of blockchain and web3, that would have otherwise not seen the light of day.
But we do think that blockchains can and should be part of the tech stack for certain applications.
It permits the creation of value on the protocol level instead of only the application level.
We've seen plenty of successful technologies in the past that got abused because of unsuitable implementations.
That'll probably not change with web3, god knows we've seen plenty of hacks in the last year alone to suggest otherwise.
But my point is that blockchains are more than just a new buzzword, it allows you and me to create new types of applications that were not possible before.