DEV Community

Onyedikachi Onwurah
Onyedikachi Onwurah

Posted on

Building Healthcare AI That Understands Patient Access

Healthcare AI systems frequently recommend services, investigations, referrals, and interventions based on clinical information. However, a clinically appropriate recommendation may not be practically accessible to the patient.

This creates a design problem: many systems model what a patient needs without adequately modelling whether the healthcare system can deliver it.

Availability is not accessibility

Consider a referral recommendation generated by an AI system. The target hospital offers the required specialist service, but the patient faces a long waiting list, inadequate insurance coverage, or significant geographical barriers.

A basic recommendation engine may consider the task complete once it identifies the facility.

A more useful system would evaluate whether the pathway is feasible.

What should an access-aware system consider?

An access-aware healthcare AI system should integrate relevant information about service locations, appointment capacity, waiting times, referral requirements, affordability, insurance arrangements, transport limitations, and digital connectivity.

These variables should be considered in context. Not every factor will be available or appropriate for every patient, and sensitive personal information must be handled with suitable safeguards.

Implications for agentic AI

Agentic healthcare systems introduce an additional challenge because they can initiate actions rather than merely generate recommendations.

A referral workflow should distinguish between a recommendation being generated, a referral being submitted, an appointment being confirmed, and care being received.

These are different states, and treating them as equivalent can create false completion signals.

A robust workflow should detect unavailable services, avoid repeated unsuccessful actions, identify feasible alternatives within authorised boundaries, and escalate unresolved access barriers.

How should we evaluate these systems?

Evaluation should extend beyond model accuracy. Relevant measures include referral completion, time to appointment, successful service utilisation, abandoned referrals, access differences between patient groups, and the proportion of recommendations that lead to appropriate care.

The goal is to understand whether AI improves the patient's ability to receive care, not merely whether it generates technically correct outputs.

Healthcare AI should be designed around the realities of healthcare delivery.

If you are developing healthcare AI or digital health solutions, consider making patient access part of your system requirements and evaluation framework.

Top comments (0)