OpenCorporates alternatives compared
Anyone evaluating OpenCorporates as a company-data source tends to hit the same handful of limits within a couple of weeks: data freshness, missing share register data, and patchy coverage of non-Anglophone registries. The table below compares the alternatives that come up most often in due diligence and KYC work.
All facts checked against the products' own pricing pages, API docs, and platform pages. Where the source is unclear, the cell says so.
Feature comparison
| OpenCorporates | OpenRegistry | Sayari | BvD / Orbis | D&B Direct+ | GLEIF | National registry sites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh model | ingested, varies per registry | live call to gov registry on every query | full rebuild every 2 weeks + daily delta | ingested from 170+ providers | configurable INTRA_DAY → MONTHLY, ~5M updates/day | 3× daily Golden Copy + delta | live |
| Directors / officers | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ (entity only, no people) | ✓ |
| Shareholders (as a separate filing from directors) | ✗ | ✓ (get_shareholders) |
✓ (ownership graph) | ✓ | partial | ✗ | varies by country |
| Persons with significant control / UBO | partial (UK PSC mostly) | ✓ (get_persons_with_significant_control) |
✓ | ✓ | partial | parent / ultimate parent only | varies |
| Mortgages and charges | ✗ | ✓ (get_charges) |
✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | varies |
| Raw statutory filings as bytes (PDF / XBRL / iXBRL) | filings list only | ✓ (fetch_document returns upstream bytes) |
✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ on most |
| Native XBRL / iXBRL financials surfaced | ✗ | ✓ on FI, KR (XBRL) and GB (iXBRL) | ✗ | ✗ (extracted to proprietary schema) | ✗ | ✗ | varies |
| Cross-jurisdiction name search in one call | ✓ | ✓ (with per-tier fan-out cap) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ (one country at a time) |
| Direct gov registry URL preserved on every record | partial | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ (RA link) | n/a (is the source) |
| MCP server for AI agents | ✗ | ✓ (public, free) | beta (enterprise contract required) | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free anonymous access (no signup) | ✓ (web only, rate-limited) | ✓ (API + web, 20 req/min) | ✗ (demo request only) | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | usually |
| Self-serve API for individuals | ✗ (paid tier from £2,250/yr) | ✓ (anonymous tier free) | ✗ (enterprise only) | ✗ (enterprise only) | ✗ (contracted) | ✓ (free) | varies |
| Entry-tier price | £2,250 / yr (Essentials) | $0 anon, $9 / mo Pro | enterprise (no published price) | enterprise | enterprise | free | mostly free |
| Pricing published on website | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | n/a |
| Jurisdictions covered | 140+ | 27 | 250+ | global (no number published) | 220+ | 232 (LEI registrants only) | 1 each |
| Entity count | ~200M | live proxy (no ingested count) | ~1.5B | ~380M (Orbis) | ~500M | ~3M active LEIs | varies |
What the table says about OpenRegistry
The OpenRegistry column is the only one that combines all of the following:
- A live call to the underlying government registry on every single query, so a director, shareholder, charge, or filing recorded today is visible the same day.
- Directors, shareholders, persons with significant control, and charges as four separate, machine-readable tools, because in most jurisdictions these correspond to four different filings and collapsing them loses information.
- Document-level access:
fetch_documentreturns the upstream PDF, iXBRL, or XBRL bytes, so audit and compliance work can cite the statutory record directly. - Native XBRL financials on Finland (PRH), Korea (DART), and the UK (iXBRL), without re-rendering or re-encoding.
- A free public MCP transport. Sayari has an MCP product as well, but it is in beta and gated behind an enterprise contract; OpenRegistry's MCP endpoint is open at
/mcpwith no signup. - Self-serve API on a free anonymous tier (20 req/min). Every other paid product on this list starts at four-figure annual contracts or enterprise pricing.
The trade-off is breadth. OpenRegistry covers 27 national registries today, against the ~145 of OpenCorporates and the larger ingest piles inside the commercial analyst suites. For workflows where the binding constraint is freshness, share-register / UBO access, or document-level provenance rather than coverage of every jurisdiction on Earth, that trade-off usually goes the other way.
Links
- OpenCorporates → opencorporates.com
- OpenRegistry → openregistry.sophymarine.com
- Sayari → sayari.com
- Bureau van Dijk / Orbis → bvdinfo.com
- Dun & Bradstreet → dnb.com
- GLEIF → gleif.org
- UK Companies House → find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk
- France RNE → data.inpi.fr
- Germany Handelsregister → handelsregister.de
- Norway Brreg → brreg.no
- Spain BORME → borme.es
- South Korea DART → dart.fss.or.kr
Top comments (0)