How Close Is ChatGPT to Human Experts? New Look at Answers and Risks
Researchers gathered tens of thousands of answers from people and ChatGPT across everyday and expert topics like money, health, law, and feelings.
They built a collection called HC3 and watched how replies from machines stack up against those from real experts.
The study finds ChatGPT often gives clear and useful replies, yet it still differ from human experts in tone and judgement, and sometimes sounds very sure while being wrong.
The team also tested ways to detect if a text was written by a person or by a model, some tests worked good in one setting but failed in another.
This matters because wrong news, copied work, and privacy leaks can spreads fast when machines write like humans.
The research points to simple next steps: make models safer, add checks, and help people learn to spot risk.
The full answers and tools are shared so everyone can try them and see how close AI is to real human skill, and what we should fix next.
Read article comprehensive review in Paperium.net:
How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, andDetection
🤖 This analysis and review was primarily generated and structured by an AI . The content is provided for informational and quick-review purposes.
Top comments (0)