Legacy enterprise systems meet modern demands. Uniface, the powerhouse for complex backend applications, isn't natively multi-threaded. But when integrating with COM components from external systems, $ALLOW_FOREIGN_THREADS becomes your gateway to safe thread handling. This setting serializes foreign thread calls, preventing crashes in high-load environments like healthcare or finance systems.
Why Uniface Needs Thread Control
Uniface excels in single-threaded operations but struggles with "foreign threads" – those spawned outside Uniface by calling applications via COM (Component Object Model). Without proper handling, concurrent access leads to race conditions, deadlocks, or instability.
- Classic Problem: External C#/.NET apps or Windows services invoke Uniface COM objects simultaneously.
- Impact: Data corruption, application hangs, or silent failures in production.
- Real-World Context: Common in hybrid legacy-modern stacks where Uniface APIs serve multi-threaded clients.
Configuration: Step-by-Step Setup
Add this to your client assignment file under the [SETTINGS] section:
[SETTINGS]
$ALLOW_FOREIGN_THREADS = 1
Values:
- 1: Enables serialization of COM invocations from foreign threads.
- 0: Disables (default: none/unset).
Critical Prerequisite: Run the Uniface COM Configuration Utility (ucomcfg.exe) from the Windows Start menu > Uniface group. This sets up thread synchronization – skipping it risks undefined behavior.
How It Works Under the Hood
When enabled, Uniface queues incoming COM calls from external threads and processes them sequentially. This mimics a thread-safe singleton pattern:
External Thread 1 → Queue → Uniface processes → Response
External Thread 2 → Queue (waits) → Uniface processes → Response
Performance Trade-off: No true parallelism, but stability first. Ideal for throughput <100 concurrent calls/sec.
Common Pitfalls & Troubleshooting
Uniface devs often hit these in practice:
| Issue | Symptoms | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Deadlocks | App freezes on COM invoke | Verify COM Utility sync settings; test with single thread first. |
| Performance Drop | High latency under load | Profile with $PROC_TRACING; consider async alternatives like Uniface Router.\ |
| Crashes | AV on multi-thread access | Ensure $ALLOW_FOREIGN_THREADS=1 + COM config; check Windows Event Logs.\ |
| Silent Fails | No errors, wrong data | Enable logging ($PROC_LOG_FILE); validate serialization order. |
Pro Tip: Test in isolated env – spawn threads via C# Task.Run() calling your Uniface COM object.
Example: C# Client Calling Uniface COM
Here's a practical integration demo:
// C# Client (Multi-threaded)
public class UnifaceInvoker
{
private readonly UnifaceCOMObject _unifaceObj;
public async Task<string> ProcessAsync(string data)
{
return await Task.Run(() => _unifaceObj.InvokeMethod(data)); // Foreign thread
}
}
// Usage: Multiple tasks hit Uniface simultaneously
var tasks = Enumerable.Range(1, 5).Select(i => invoker.ProcessAsync($"Data-{i}"));
await Task.WhenAll(tasks);
With $ALLOW_FOREIGN_THREADS=1, all calls serialize safely. Without? Expect chaos.
When to Use (and Avoid) It
Use Cases:
- COM bridges to .NET/C# services.
- Legacy Uniface APIs exposed to IIS-hosted apps.
- Enterprise integrations (e.g., ERP + Uniface).
Avoid If:
- Pure Uniface-to-Uniface comms (use messages instead).
- High-throughput needs (>500 TPS) – explore Uniface Router multi-threading.
Modern Alternatives & Future-Proofing
Rocket Software's Uniface 10.4+ pushes cloud-native patterns. Consider:
- Uniface Router: Built-in multi-threaded load balancer.
- REST/JSON APIs: Bypass COM entirely.
- Migration Path: Containerize with Docker/K8s for true parallelism.
$ALLOW_FOREIGN_THREADS bridges the gap – use it wisely to extend legacy Uniface lifespans.
Disclosure: _This article was generated with assistance from an AI language model, based on official Uniface 10.4 documentation and verified sources. Code examples are illustrative and should be tested in your environment.
Questions for you: Integrating with specific C# frameworks? Share your stack for tailored advice!
Top comments (0)