Peter Jacxsens

Posted on Sep 23, 2022 • Edited on Dec 21

How to mock Next router with Jest

#jest #mocking #nextjs

Edit: I updated this article for mocking useRouter in app router in Next 15.

I will start off with a quick snippet for the people only looking for that. I give a long explanation including examples and tests after.

tl;dr

// mock useRouter
jest.mock('next/router', () => ({
  useRouter: jest.fn()
}))

// setup a new mocking function for push method
const pushMock = jest.fn()

// mock a return value on useRouter
useRouter.mockReturnValue({
  query: {},
  // return mock for push method
  push: pushMock,
  // ... add the props or methods you need
})

The example

To demonstrate how to mock next/router I will use an example. The example files and tests are available on github and are build on create-next-app. So you can just run npm run dev to run the example or npm run test to run the test files.

This is what we will build:

We have a list of 3 fruits that can be sorted. We control the sort order (ascending or descending) by selecting a radio input.

This little project relies on url query parameters. For example, selecting 'sort descending' will trigger a router.push to http://localhost:3000/?sortOrder=desc. We have a component List that reads this query parameter and sorts the list accordingly. The second component SortControles renders the radio inputs.

// components/List.js
import { useRouter } from 'next/router'

function List(){
  const list = ['Cherry', 'Apple', 'Banana']

  const router = useRouter()
  // read sortOrder from query || set default 'asc'
  const sortOrder = (router.query.hasOwnProperty('sortOrder')) ? router.query.sortOrder : 'asc'

  // sort the items by sortOrder
  const sortedList = [...list].sort((a,b) => {
    if(sortOrder == 'desc') return a > b ? -1 : 1
    return a < b ? -1 : 1
  })

  return(
    <ul>
      {sortedList.map(item => <li key={item}>{item}</li>)}
    </ul>
  )
}

export default List

This should be pretty straightforward. We read sortOrder from the url query and sort the list accordingly. When there is no sortOrder query, we use a default 'asc' value.

// components/SortControles.js
import { useRouter } from "next/router";

function SortControles(){
  const router = useRouter()
  // read sortOrder from query || set default 'asc'
  const sortOrder = router.query.hasOwnProperty('sortOrder') ? router.query.sortOrder : 'asc'

  const handleChange = (e) => {
    router.push({
      pathname: '/',
      query: { sortOrder: e.target.value }
    })
  }

  return(
    <>
      <label>
        <input
          type="radio"
          name="sortOrder"
          value="asc"
          checked={sortOrder === 'asc'}
          onChange={(e) => handleChange(e)}
        />
        sort ascending
      </label>
      <label>
        <input
          type="radio"
          name="sortOrder"
          value="desc"
          checked={sortOrder === 'desc'}
          onChange={(e) => handleChange(e)}
        />
        sort descending
      </label>
    </>
  )
}

export default SortControles

In SortControles we again retrieve sortOrder from query or set a default of 'asc'. We render out 2 radio inputs: 'sort ascending' and 'sort descending'. We determine which one is checked and we add a handler. This handler pushes a query (sortOrder 'asc' or 'desc') to router.

This should be clear. Note that I intentionally used radio inputs so I could mock router.push in testing this component.

There is a second sidenote. This is not relevant to mocking next router so you can skip this note if you want. When using SSG + router.query you run into a problem that I solved in page/index.js.

---- begin sidenote ----

// pages/index.js
import { useState, useEffect } from 'react'
import { useRouter } from 'next/router'
import List from '../components/List'
import SortControles from '../components/SortControles'

export default function Home(){
  const [routerReady, setRouterReady] = useState(false)
  const router = useRouter()
  useEffect(() => {
    if(router.isReady){
      setRouterReady(true)
    }
  }, [router.isReady])

  if(!routerReady) return null

  return( 
    <>
      <SortControles />
      <List />
    </>
  )
}

I'm using a default static site generation (SSG) Next build. This causes a little problem, namely the query element on the router will be empty on first render. Only after hydration will it be populated with the query actually present in the url. This is normal behaviour docs.

In our case however it has an undesired side effect. If we load the url http://localhost:3000/?sortOrder=desc then at first render (before hydration), the query will be empty. As you saw in the files, we provide a default asc value when there is no query. So on first render, the list will be sorted ascending. Then the app gets hydrated and it rerenders the list in descending order. In other words, there will be a flash from ascending to descending. And we don't want that.

To solve this, we used the code above. We set state routerReady to false. While routerReady is false, we don't render anything. Meanwhile in useEffect() we listen for the isReady prop on the router. This is set to true after hydration. When it's true, we set state routerReady to true and the components render.

I looks quite complicated but we just wait for hydration to give us access to router.query. Before that we don't render anything. Because our components List and SortControles are only rendered when router.isReady, we don't have to worry about this in those components.

This was just a sidenote in case you were wondering about the page/index.js file and the empty query on first render.

---- end sidenote ----

Testing

We will now do the actual testing and mocking. We start with testing List.

Testing List

If we simply render list in a test file, the test will fail to run because we don't have access to router. So, we have to mock Next router. This is easy:

jest.mock('next/router', () => ({
  useRouter: jest.fn()
}))

We mock the named export useRouter. More info on mocking named or default exports can be found in another article I wrote.

But, this won't suffice. Remember that we need the query object on useRouter and that doesn't exist since we just mocked useRouter. So we need to add a return value to our mock. (Again, read here how to add return values to mocks). So, let's add a return value:

useRouter.mockReturnValue({ query: {}})

And that's it. We now have a useRouter mock that has a query property. Let's look at the first test for List:

// components/__test__/List.test.js

import { screen, render } from '@testing-library/react'
import { toHaveTextContent } from '@testing-library/jest-dom'

import { useRouter } from 'next/router'
import List from '../List'

jest.mock('next/router', () => ({
  useRouter: jest.fn()
}))

test('List renders with an empty query', () => {
  useRouter.mockReturnValue({ query: {}})
  render(<List />)
  const listItems = screen.getAllByRole('listitem')
  expect(listItems[0]).toHaveTextContent('Apple')
  expect(listItems[1]).toHaveTextContent('Banana')
  expect(listItems[2]).toHaveTextContent('Cherry')
})

A breakdown of the test: first we add a return value to our useRouter mock. What did we return? An object with a query property. The value of this property is an empty object.

When List renders, it receives this empty object and it will fallback to the default 'asc' value. So, it renders the list ascending: 'Apple', 'Banana', 'Cherry'. And that is what we tested.

Let's look at the other tests for List:

// components/__test__/List.test.js

test('It renders correctly with query sortOrder=asc', () => {
  useRouter.mockReturnValue({ query: { sortOrder: 'asc' }})
  render(<List />)
  const listItems = screen.getAllByRole('listitem')
  expect(listItems[0]).toHaveTextContent('Apple')
  expect(listItems[1]).toHaveTextContent('Banana')
  expect(listItems[2]).toHaveTextContent('Cherry')
})

test('It renders correctly with query sortOrder=desc', () => {
  useRouter.mockReturnValue({ query: { sortOrder: 'desc' }})
  render(<List />)
  const listItems = screen.getAllByRole('listitem')
  expect(listItems[2]).toHaveTextContent('Apple')
  expect(listItems[1]).toHaveTextContent('Banana')
  expect(listItems[0]).toHaveTextContent('Cherry')
})

These should make sense. We mocked a return value of sortOrder 'asc' and then 'desc' and then checked the order of the list. And that's the end of testing List.

Testing SortControles

SortControles also uses the query property and we now know how to mock that. But, on top of that, it uses the push method on useRouter. This is how we mock that:

// mock useRouter
jest.mock('next/router', () => ({
  useRouter: jest.fn()
}))

// add return value query and push
useRouter.mockReturnValue({
  query: {},
  push: () => {}
})

Let's first take a look at our test file:

// components/__test__/SortControles.js

import { screen, render } from '@testing-library/react'
import { toBeInTheDocument } from '@testing-library/jest-dom'
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
import { useRouter } from 'next/router'
import SortControles from '../SortControles'

jest.mock('next/router', () => ({
  useRouter: jest.fn()
}))

function setupRender(){
  render(<SortControles />)
  const radioAsc = screen.getByRole('radio', { name: /sort ascending/i })
  const radioDesc = screen.getByRole('radio', { name: /sort descending/i })
  return {
    radioAsc,
    radioDesc
  }
}

describe('components/SortControles', () => {
  // tests here
})

A breakdown: we first have our imports and mock of useRouter. Then I use this setup function.

function setupRender(){
  render(<SortControles />)
  const radioAsc = screen.getByRole('radio', { name: /sort ascending/i })
  const radioDesc = screen.getByRole('radio', { name: /sort descending/i })
  return {
    radioAsc,
    radioDesc
  }
}

I run different tests and in each test I have to make the same queries to the radio inputs. So, instead having to rewrite these queries over and over I wrote this setup function:

It makes the render
It makes the queries
It returns these queries

To setup our test I simply call the function and catch the return value:

const { radioAsc, radioDesc } = setupRender()

This renders the component and gives me the elements I want to test. Nice and simple. On to the actual tests. We test 3 situation: query: {}, query: {sortOrder: 'asc'} and query: {sortOrder: 'desc'}

// components/__test__/SortControles.js

test('It renders with an empty query', () => {
  useRouter.mockReturnValue({
    query: {},
    push: () => {}
  })
  const { radioAsc, radioDesc } = setupRender()

  expect(radioAsc).toBeInTheDocument()
  expect(radioAsc).toBeChecked()
  expect(radioDesc).toBeInTheDocument()
  expect(radioDesc).not.toBeChecked()
})

test('It renders with a query sortOrder=asc', () => {
  useRouter.mockReturnValue({
    query: { sortOrder: 'asc' },
    push: () => {}
  })
  const { radioAsc, radioDesc } = setupRender()

  expect(radioAsc).toBeChecked()
  expect(radioDesc).not.toBeChecked()
})

test('It renders with a query sortOrder=desc', () => {
  useRouter.mockReturnValue({
    query: { sortOrder: 'desc' },
    push: () => {}
  })
  const { radioAsc, radioDesc } = setupRender()

  expect(radioAsc).not.toBeChecked()
  expect(radioDesc).toBeChecked()
})

These tests should be clear. We expect the radio input corresponding to the query to be checked.

Our next tests on SortControles have user events. We want to see if clicks on the radio inputs are correctly caught. But how? In the SortControles component, clicks on the radios trigger a router.push. We returned the push method from out mock:

useRouter.mockReturnValue({
  push: () => {}
})

But, we can't test this method. For example, this is impossible:

// error, push is not defined
expect(push).toHaveBeenCalled()
// error, Received has value: undefined
expect(useRouter.push).toHaveBeenCalled()

We need push to be a mock function. Let's do that:

// mock useRouter
jest.mock('next/router', () => ({
  useRouter: jest.fn()
}))
// make a mock function
const pushMock = jest.fn()
// return a value from useRouter mock
useRouter.mockReturnValue({
  push: pushMock
})

And that's all. We now have a mock for push that we can access:

expect(pushMock).toHaveBeenCalled()

Let's see the last 2 tests:

// components/__test__/SortControles.js

// on top of the page we added the pushMock
const pushMock = jest.fn()

// more tests
test('It calls router.push with the correct arguments when clicking desc radio', async() => {
  const user = userEvent.setup()
  useRouter.mockReturnValue({
    query: { sortOrder: 'asc' },
    push: pushMock,
  })
  const { radioDesc } = setupRender()

  await user.click(radioDesc)
  expect(pushMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith( expect.objectContaining({
    query: { sortOrder: 'desc' }
  }))
})

test('It calls router.push with the correct arguments when clicking asc radio', async() => {
  const user = userEvent.setup()
  useRouter.mockReturnValue({
    query: { sortOrder: 'desc' },
    push: pushMock,
  })
  const { radioAsc } = setupRender()

  await user.click(radioAsc)
  expect(pushMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith( expect.objectContaining({
    query: { sortOrder: 'asc' }
  }))
})

In these last 2 tests, the useRouter mocks return an object with 2 properties: our push method now with the pushMock and a query with sortOrder: 'asc' in the first and sortOrder: 'desc' in the second. We simulate a click and then test what the handler - pushMock - was called with.

Summary

To mock useRouter we start of by mocking it as a named import:

jest.mock('next/router', () => ({
  useRouter: jest.fn()
}))

We have now mocked useRouter but this mock is useless because in our components useRouter is used, for example using the push() method or reading the query property.

So, to make our useRouter mock usefull, we need to have useRouter return something. We return the methods or properties we need. In the above examples we used:

useRouter.mockReturnValue({
  query: {},
  push: () => {}
})

To actually test the push method, simply adding a dummy function won't suffice. So we make a new mocking function and set that up as our push method.

const pushMock = jest.fn()

useRouter.mockReturnValue({
  query: {},
  push: pushMock
})

Now, we can call Jest helper functions like toHaveBeenCalled on the pushMock. And that is all there is to it.

When testing your own components, you will probably need other useRouter properties or methods. You should now be able to set these up for yourself.

Hoped you learned something and good testing!

Update: I wrote a new series of articles on how to test useRouter and useSearchParams in Next 13 (next/navigation)

Top comments (5)

James F. Thomas • Aug 22

Great article it helped me figure out how to mock useRouter.

I didn't use the mock return value inside my it() block for the test but seeing how you created and then set the value of push to a jest function is what I needed

set up before describe block

test button click that uses router.push

Stelihs, Marats (UK) • Nov 30 '23 • Edited

hmmm....., did not work. getting invariant expected app router to be mounted

`import { useRouter } from "next/router";
import { render, screen } from "@testing-library/react";
import { OverlayProvider } from "@/providers/OverlayProvider";
import { Login } from "../Auth/Login";

jest.mock("next/router", () => ({
useRouter: jest.fn(),
}));

describe("Login", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
(useRouter as jest.Mock).mockImplementation(
(): Partial> => ({
push: jest.fn(),
}),
);
});
it("shows the password reset banner when given a redirect reason", () => {
render(

,
);

expect(
  screen.getByText(
    "New Password has been updated. Login using new password.",
  ),
).toBeInTheDocument();

});
afterEach(() => {
jest.clearAllMocks();
});`

Nathan Reinhardt • Jul 30

If you are using Next JS Version 14, the code above at the time of writing this comment is out of date. In the test file for mocking the router instead of doing what was above:
import { useRouter } from 'next/router'

jest.mock('next/router', () => ({
useRouter: jest.fn()
}))

Do this instead for Next JS version 14:
import { useRouter } from 'next/navigation'

jest.mock('next/navigation', () => ({
useRouter: jest.fn()
}))

It will get around the error: "invariant expected app router to be mounted"