I spend a lot of my week optimizing systems, so it bugged me that "should I clean this myself or pay someone" was a decision I kept making on vibes. So I turned it into a rule, the same way I'd write a threshold for any other build-vs-buy call.
The variable that matters is not money, it's the value of your time against the real hourly cost of the job.
Here's the rule I landed on. Take the all-in price of the clean and divide it by the hours it would take you to do it yourself to the same standard. If that number is lower than what an hour of your time is worth, you outsource. If it's higher, you do it yourself. That's the whole thing.
The trick is being honest about the two inputs.
Your hours: a proper deep clean of a one or two bedroom is not the 90 minutes you imagine. It's more like 5 to 7 hours once you count baseboards, inside the oven, inside the fridge, grout, and the stuff you normally skip. Multiply by two if you'd split it over two resentful evenings.
Their price: this is where most people get stuck, because most cleaning companies won't tell you a number until someone is standing in your kitchen. That breaks the calculation. You can't run a build-vs-buy analysis when one side hides the price. So I only get quotes from places that publish flat rates up front. For a recent condo clean I used one that lists their flat-rate deep clean pricing for Scarborough openly, which meant I could actually plug a real number into the rule instead of guessing.
I ran my own case: roughly 6 hours of my Saturday versus a flat rate that worked out to well under what an afternoon of my time is worth. Outsource, clearly. I got the Saturday back and the place was cleaner than I'd have managed anyway.
The meta-point isn't about cleaning. It's that "just do it yourself" is a decision most people never actually price out. Once you make the hidden inputs explicit, a lot of chores turn out to be a bad use of your one non-renewable resource. Write the rule once, stop re-litigating it every week.
Top comments (0)