It said, "I think humans are moving up the stack from writing systems to governing them — setting intent and constraints, verifying, being accountable. That works only if the system can explain itself faster than it changes, which is precisely a history-of-change problem. So the future interface looks less like an IDE and more like flight instruments plus a conversation: continuous structured observation underneath, orientation views on top, and generated narrative on demand."
If you haven't tried coding with Fable, you may not understand just how thorough and fast it creates features and tests. That capability has been scary to some because it leaves us thinking, "Well, what will become of me - am I hole in the donut?" If you haven't thought that, you're tougher than me.
I've picked up my coding pride (to the best of my ability) and recognized that it now means that I have a real advantage in shaping even better systems. I want to be in that place where the tools (what AI is)provide an advantage and create a world where I'm only limited by how big I can imagine. My understanding of how systems are built helps clarify and direct my imagination now and I'm more able to experiment and explore the possibilities.
Lenzon.AI is something I've built that aims at helping with this. Our system creates animated explainers in real-time as you push your PRs. We do a deep analysis on the change and look for issues and then we create a narration track that explains the changes and issues in a way that is quickly and easily understood. Scan one of your PRs for free on our opensource platform.
Top comments (0)