REST vs GraphQL vs OData — Choosing the Right API for the Right Job
“Not every app needs GraphQL. Not every enterprise loves OData. And REST isn’t dying anytime soon.”
When building APIs, we often face a critical decision early on: REST , GraphQL , or OData?
Each shines in different scenarios — and each can become a bottleneck if misused.
In this post, we’ll break down:
- ✅ What REST, GraphQL, and OData really are
- 🧠 When to use each with real-world project examples
- ⚖️ Pros and cons of each style
- 🛠️ How to migrate between them (if you must)
🔹 1. REST — The Veteran That Still Works
Best when:
You need a simple, resource-oriented API with predictable endpoints and strong HTTP semantics.
📦 Real Project: A Marketplace API (like Etsy or Flipkart)
Imagine you’re building an API for a marketplace:
GET /products
GET /products/:id
POST /orders
PUT /users/:id
This works great for:
- Mobile and web clients consuming standard resource collections
- Public APIs exposed to third-party developers
- Systems with caching requirements
✅ Pros:
- Simple to understand and implement
- Easy to cache with HTTP headers
- Works with any client/tool (browsers, Postman, curl, etc.)
- Massive ecosystem support
❌ Cons:
- Overfetching/underfetching data
- Multiple calls to build complex UI views
- Versioning can become messy (/v1/, /v2/)
🔧 Example: Fetching user orders
GET /users/123/orders
But now you also need product thumbnails and delivery status — either you call two more APIs or create a new endpoint. This is where REST becomes rigid.
🔹 2. GraphQL — The Frontend Developer’s Dream
Best when:
You need flexible data fetching, rapid UI iterations, or multiple nested resources in one go.
📱 Real Project: Social Networking App (like Twitter or LinkedIn)
Let’s say you’re building a feed screen that shows:
- Post content
- User who posted it
- Comments (with commenter details)
- Like counts
With REST, you’d make 3–4 calls.
With GraphQL, one query does it all:
{
feed {
post
user { name avatar }
comments {
text
user { name }
}
}
}
✅ Pros:
- Clients fetch exactly what they need
- Multiple resources in one request
- Great introspection, schema validation, and type safety
- Subscriptions for real-time updates
❌ Cons:
- Caching is more complex (no native HTTP caching)
- Rate limiting and query complexity need to be enforced manually
- Harder for teams unfamiliar with schema-first development
⚠️ Real Pain Point:
If your API is public or used by many third-party clients, GraphQL may be overly flexible , increasing attack surface or server load.
🔹 3. OData — The Enterprise Powerhouse
Best when:
You’re building internal or enterprise-grade apps with rich relational data that needs to plug into tools like Excel , Power BI , or SAP.
🏢 Real Project: Employee Analytics Portal (like HR dashboards in Microsoft Dynamics)
Use cases:
- Fetch top 10 highest-paid employees over age 40
- Export filtered data to Excel or Power BI
- Drill down on KPIs without writing backend logic
OData lets you do this directly:
GET /Employees?$filter=Age gt 40&$orderby=Salary desc&$top=10
✅ Pros:
- Built-in filtering, sorting, pagination, and projection
- Excellent integration with Microsoft/BI tools
- Schema metadata is auto-generated
- Great for low-code tools and reporting systems
❌ Cons:
- Steeper learning curve
- Verbose URLs
- Less flexible for custom business logic
- Not widely adopted outside Microsoft ecosystem
⚔️ Side-by-Side Comparison
🧠 TL;DR — Choose Based on the Job
✍️ Final Thoughts
You don’t have to choose one forever. Many modern platforms use a hybrid approach:
- REST for external integrations
- GraphQL for frontend customization
- OData for reporting dashboards
The key is to pick what’s right for your clients and team — not what’s trending.
💬 Over to You
What API architecture is your team using — and why?
Have you hit performance bottlenecks or scalability walls?
Let’s chat in the comments 👇
Top comments (0)