_What would an independent Salesforce expert find if they reviewed your org today? _
For many organisations, that is surprisingly difficult to answer.
Salesforce may support critical business processes every day, while teams have only a partial view of how much custom code exists, how automations depend on one another, which integrations are fragile, or how much technical debt has accumulated.
That is where a Salesforce audit becomes useful.
A Salesforce audit provides an independent, structured review of your Salesforce environment. It helps you understand what is working, where risks exist, and what should be improved before those issues start affecting users, security, reporting or future releases.
This guide explains what a Salesforce audit covers, when you may need one, how the Spyrosoft CRM Audit Framework works, and what you should expect at the end of the process.
What is a Salesforce audit?
A Salesforce audit is an in-depth review of how your Salesforce org is designed, configured and maintained.
It can assess:
- architecture and data model
- Apex code and triggers
- Salesforce Flows and other automation
- security and access
- integrations
- data quality
- platform performance
- technical debt
- alignment between Salesforce and current business processes
The aim is not simply to identify problems.
A useful audit should explain why an issue exists, how serious it is, what business impact it may create and what should be done next.
That makes a Salesforce audit different from a lighter platform review.
A Salesforce Health Check, for example, is commonly used to review areas such as security settings and visible platform risks. For a broader overview, see our guide to the importance of a Salesforce Health Check.
A full Salesforce org audit goes deeper into the platform's technical foundations, including code quality, automation architecture, integration design, security, scalability and technical debt.
In practical terms:
A Health Check helps you understand where to look. A Salesforce audit helps you understand what is really there, how much risk it creates and what you should do about it.
Why does Salesforce technical debt grow?
One of Salesforce's biggest strengths is flexibility.
That flexibility also makes it easy for small changes to accumulate.
A Salesforce environment may start with a carefully planned implementation. Processes are defined, licences are selected, the data model is prepared and the platform goes live.
Then the business changes.
A new field is added for one team.
A Flow is changed to support an exception.
An integration is adjusted before a deadline.
A report is created for one manager.
A package is installed for a short-term requirement.
Each decision may make sense on its own. Problems usually appear when these changes are no longer reviewed, documented or cleaned up.
After a few years, the Salesforce org may still work, but:
- changes take longer than expected
- releases become harder to predict
- automations have unclear dependencies
- integrations are difficult to troubleshoot
- unused fields and components remain in the system
- teams are reluctant to change existing functionality
- nobody has a complete view of how the platform works
This is Salesforce technical debt.
An audit makes that debt visible and helps determine which parts actually create business or technical risk.
When should you run a Salesforce audit?
You do not need to wait for a major Salesforce failure.
In many organisations, the early warning signs appear much sooner.
Consider an audit if:
- every Salesforce change seems to take longer than before
- releases regularly create unexpected problems
- nobody can clearly explain some Flows, integrations or custom code
- important platform knowledge sits with one person or supplier
- you operate in a multivendor Salesforce delivery environment with unclear ownership
- users report recurring issues that are difficult to diagnose
- Salesforce releases or new features are postponed because teams are worried about dependencies
- you suspect security or permission risks
- leadership wants an independent view of platform quality
- the business no longer fully trusts estimates, reports or delivery timelines
The common theme is uncertainty.
A Salesforce audit replaces assumptions with evidence.
What should a Salesforce audit cover?
There is no single audit scope that works for every organisation. A smaller Sales Cloud implementation will need a different review from a global environment with several Salesforce products and external systems.
However, eight areas are particularly important.
*1. Architecture and design *
Review the overall Salesforce architecture, data model, custom objects, configuration approach and major design decisions.
The key question is:
Can the current architecture support future growth without making every new change harder?
*2. Code quality *
Review Apex classes, triggers, test coverage, duplication, documentation and maintainability.
Poorly structured code can increase defects, slow releases and create dependency on individual developers.
*3. Automation *
Analyse Flows, approval processes, validation rules and other automations.
The audit should identify overlapping logic, unnecessary complexity and dependencies that make changes risky.
*4. Security and access *
Review profiles, permission sets, sharing rules, field-level security and high-risk access.
A Salesforce security audit should identify excessive permissions and access patterns that may create security or compliance risk.
*5. Integrations *
Review APIs, middleware, synchronisation logic, error handling, connected systems and ownership.
An integration does not need to fail completely to create problems. Poor monitoring or unclear ownership can lead to missing data, repeated manual corrections and difficult troubleshooting.
*6. Data quality *
Check for duplicates, incomplete records, inconsistent fields, outdated information and weak data governance.
Poor data quality eventually affects reports, dashboards, automation and business decisions.
*7. Performance *
Review page load times, automation execution, platform limits, report performance and user experience.
Performance problems often reveal deeper architecture or automation issues.
*8. Technical debt and business process fit *
Identify unused fields, legacy customisations, old packages, undocumented changes and fragile dependencies.
At the same time, compare how Salesforce was originally designed with how teams actually work today.
This becomes especially important when an organisation uses multiple Salesforce cloud products.
Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, marketing tools, integrations and reporting do not operate independently. A change in one part of the platform can affect several others.
That is why Salesforce should be reviewed as one connected ecosystem.
How does the Spyrosoft CRM Audit Framework work?
A Salesforce audit needs structure.
Without a clear methodology, it is easy to collect hundreds of technical observations without answering the question that matters most:
*What should we actually fix first? *
Spyrosoft uses the Spyrosoft CRM Audit Framework to review both functional and technical aspects of a Salesforce environment.
As Michał Gronowski, Salesforce & Enterprise Architect and Co-founder & CTO of Spyrosoft Connect, explains:
“We split our work into two areas, functional and technical, and we start from a helicopter overview. Then, we dig into details where needed.”
The process consists of five main stages.
*Step 1: Understand the context *
The audit starts with business goals, known pain points, current challenges and expectations.
This prevents the review from becoming a purely technical exercise.
*Step 2: Map the Salesforce environment *
The team builds a high-level picture of:
- org structure
- key business processes
- important customisations
- data model
- integrations
- major automation
- areas that may require deeper analysis
This gives auditors the context needed to decide where the largest risks may exist.
*Step 3: Investigate high-risk areas *
The review then goes deeper where necessary.
That could mean analysing:
- Apex code
- complex Flows
- security configuration
- integrations
- data quality
- performance
- technical debt
Not every part of the org requires the same level of investigation.
The goal is to focus effort where it can reveal the most important issues.
*Step 4: Prioritise findings *
Finding an issue is only half the job.
Each finding should be assessed based on:
- severity
- technical risk
- business impact
- urgency
- effort required to resolve it
This separates genuine risks from minor optimisation opportunities.
*Step 5: Present the findings and next steps *
The final results should be understandable to both technical teams and business stakeholders.
Spyrosoft uses a simple green, yellow and red rating model to make the current state easier to understand.
- Green: healthy or low-risk areas
- Yellow: areas that need attention
- Red: significant risks requiring action
For management or board-level stakeholders, the detailed technical analysis can also be condensed into a key takeaways summary covering the most important risks and priorities.
What should you receive after a Salesforce audit?
A Salesforce audit should not end with a 100-page report that nobody opens again.
The useful outcome is a prioritised improvement plan.
A good Salesforce audit report should make clear:
- what the biggest risks are
- how serious they are
- which issues affect users or business processes
- which problems can be solved quickly
- which changes need architectural or technical planning
- what should be added to the longer-term Salesforce roadmap
Some findings may be relatively easy to address.
Examples include:
- removing unused components
- correcting risky permissions
- fixing broken automation
- documenting critical integrations
Other issues may require more substantial work:
- refactoring Apex
- redesigning integrations
- simplifying automation architecture
- restructuring the data model
- reducing accumulated technical debt
The important point is that the organisation knows what to do now, what to plan next and what can wait.
For organisations with an ongoing backlog or limited internal Salesforce capacity, audit recommendations can also become part of a structured Salesforce managed services model.
Salesforce audit vs. Salesforce Health Check
This distinction is worth making clearly.
*Salesforce Health Check: *
A lighter review focused on visible risks and general platform health.
*Salesforce audit: *
A deeper review of architecture, code, automation, integrations, security, data, performance and technical debt.
If you mainly need an initial indication of platform health, a Health Check may be enough.
If you need to understand why delivery has become difficult, whether your architecture can scale, where technical risk exists or what should be improved first, a deeper Salesforce org audit is usually more useful.
What makes a Salesforce audit valuable?
The real value is not the number of issues discovered.
It is clarity.
After the audit, your team should be able to answer:
- Where does our Salesforce org stand today?
- Which areas create the most risk?
- What is technical debt costing us?
- Which problems should we fix first?
- Which improvements can wait?
- Can the current architecture support future growth?
- What should become part of our Salesforce roadmap?
That makes an audit useful not only for administrators, developers and architects, but also for IT leaders and business stakeholders responsible for Salesforce investment.
Final thoughts
Salesforce problems are not always obvious.
The platform can continue working while changes become slower, deployments become riskier and teams gradually lose confidence in the system.
A Salesforce audit provides an independent view of the platform's real condition.
It reviews architecture, code, automation, security, integrations, data, performance and technical debt, then converts those findings into priorities.
If your Salesforce environment has been heavily customised, depends on several integrations or supports business-critical processes, an independent audit can help you understand what should be fixed now and what should become part of your longer-term roadmap.
Want an independent view of your Salesforce setup? Explore Spyrosoft Salesforce services and see how the Spyrosoft CRM Audit Framework can help you identify risks and plan the next step.
Frequently asked questions
*What is a Salesforce audit? *
A Salesforce audit is an independent review of a Salesforce org. It evaluates areas such as architecture, code quality, automation, security, integrations, data, performance and technical debt, then connects the findings to business impact.
*What does a Salesforce audit include? *
The scope depends on the organisation, but it commonly includes architecture, Apex code, Flows, security, integrations, data quality, performance, technical debt and business process fit.
*How is a Salesforce audit different from a Salesforce Health Check? *
A Salesforce Health Check is generally a lighter review of visible risks and platform health. A Salesforce audit goes deeper into areas such as code, architecture, integrations, automation and long-term maintainability.
For a lighter review, see our guide to the importance of a Salesforce Health Check.
*How long does a Salesforce audit take? *
The timeline depends on the size and complexity of the Salesforce environment. An audit may take from two to several weeks, beginning with a high-level review before moving into the highest-risk areas.
*What does a Salesforce security audit check? *
A Salesforce security audit can review profiles, permission sets, sharing rules, field-level security, guest user access and integration accounts to identify security or compliance risks.
*What do you get after a Salesforce audit? *
The expected output is a clear audit report containing prioritised findings, severity ratings, practical recommendations, stakeholder takeaways and a roadmap showing what should be addressed now, next and later.
*What happens after the Salesforce audit? *
The organisation can use the findings internally or turn them into an ongoing improvement roadmap. Where regular Salesforce support is required, the recommendations can also feed into a managed services model.
This article is based on Spyrosoft's Salesforce audit methodology. The original version is available at Spyrosoft.
Top comments (0)