Remote and outsourced dev teams are no longer “special cases” – for many companies, that is the engineering org.
But if you’ve ever worked with a team in another country or time zone, you already know the pain:
- Half-baked tickets
- Confusing handovers
- Slack pings at weird hours
- Endless “Can you clarify this?” messages
As a developer who’s worked both inside an outsourcing company and with clients’ in-house teams, I’ve seen the good, the bad, and the chaotic.
This post is for:
- Devs in US/EU companies who work with offshore/outsourced teams
- Devs in India/other regions who are part of those outsourced teams
- Tech leads trying to make this collaboration less painful for everyone
I’m not going to talk about “cost savings” or “rates”. This is purely about how to collaborate better as engineers.
1. Treat outsourced teams as part of the engineering org, not a ticket factory
The biggest mistake I see: outsourced teams are treated like a Jira vending machine.
“Here are the tickets. Just build it.”
That kills ownership and quality.
Instead:
-
Share the why, not just the what.
Add a small “Context / Problem” section in tickets:- What’s the business goal?
- What metric does this impact?
- What’s the user story behind this feature?
-
Invite them to tech discussions.
Even if time zones don’t align, share:- Architecture diagrams
- ADRs (Architecture Decision Records)
- Loom videos summarizing decisions
Let them disagree.
If the remote team cannot say, “This design will cause scaling issues later,” you don’t have a partnership — you have outsourced typing.
2. Write async-friendly tickets (this alone can save days per sprint)
When you work across time zones, every “quick clarification” can cost 12–24 hours.
Good tickets are an engineering productivity tool.
A simple structure that works really well:
1. Context
- Short paragraph on business goal
- Links to Notion/Confluence/specs
2. Requirements
- Bullet out expected behavior
- Cover edge cases (empty states, error states, permissions, etc.)
3. UX/UI
- Link Figma/Designs
- Mention which parts are “must match exactly” vs “flexible”
4. Technical Notes (optional)
- Existing APIs / DB tables / models
- Performance constraints
- Feature flags, logging requirements
5. Acceptance Criteria
- “Given / When / Then” style works great:
- Given I am a logged-in user
- When I click “Download report”
- Then a CSV is generated and emailed within 5 minutes
If your outsourced team receives tickets like this, you’ll see:
- Fewer clarifications
- Fewer reworks
- Better estimates
And yes, your future self will also thank you.
3. Over-communicate the “definition of done”
“Done” is one of the most overloaded words in software.
For one team, “done” = code pushed.
For another, “done” = in production, dashboards green, docs updated.
To avoid surprises with remote teams, make DoD explicit. For example:
A feature is done only when:
- Code merged to
main(after review) - Unit tests + basic integration tests added
- Linting & formatter pass
- Feature behind a flag (if needed)
- Monitoring/logging added (if relevant)
- Basic docs / README update
- Deployed to staging / production (depending on your process)
Document this once. Link it in every sprint kickoff.
It feels “process heavy”, but it reduces arguments and friction later.
4. Use pull requests as collaboration, not just gates
When working with an outsourced team, PRs can easily turn into:
“Fix this. Change that. Why did you do this?”
Which feels like a police inspection more than a review.
Instead, try:
-
Ask curious questions instead of accusations
- ❌ “Why did you do it like this?”
- ✅ “Can you help me understand the trade-offs you considered here?”
Suggest, don’t dictate
Use GitHub suggestions where possible:
- const limit = 50;
+ const limit = 100; // matches product requirement for max items/page
-
Review structure, not just syntax
- Does the code follow architecture guidelines?
- Are we duplicating logic?
- Are there security or performance concerns?
-
Time-box review cycles
Remote teams often sit blocked on reviews. Define:- “PRs < 200 LOC → review within 24 hours”
- “Larger PRs → split or schedule a review session”
Good review culture turns outsourced devs into true teammates, not “external vendors”.
5. Respect time zones and create overlap on purpose
Healthy remote collaboration = async-first, but not async-only.
Some practical tips:
Define overlap hours clearly
Even 1–2 hours of overlap can unblock a week’s worth of work.-
Use the overlap for the right things
- Sprint planning
- Architecture discussions
- “Gray area” decisions
Don’t waste overlap hours on things that could have been documented.
-
Be very intentional about meetings
- Share agenda in advance
- Record calls
- Summarize decisions in writing
6. Share your engineering standards openly
If you’re the client / in-house team:
- Share your coding guidelines
- Share folder structure patterns
- Share testing philosophy
- Share how you like:
- Logging
- Error handling
- Observability
If you’re the outsourced team:
- Ask for these explicitly.
- If they don’t exist, propose a starter version.
This avoids the situation where both teams build the same thing… differently.
7. Things I’ve seen go wrong (that you can avoid)
A few recurring anti-patterns:
“Let’s give them only the boring work.”
→ You end up with a demotivated team and low-quality code in critical but “unsexy” areas.“We’ll fix the architecture later.”
→ Spoiler: you won’t. Once multiple teams are building on top of it, your options shrink.Only talking to project managers, never to engineers.
→ Information gets distorted. Engineers are forced to guess.Rotating outsourced vendors frequently.
→ You lose product context each time. You save nothing in the long run.Treating every outsourced team as disposable.
→ The best devs don’t want to work in environments where they’re treated that way.
8. If you’re a developer inside an outsourcing company
A few tips for you too:
-
Act like an owner, not a contractor
- Ask about business goals
- Proactively flag risks
- Suggest simplifications
-
Build trust with consistency
- Hit deadlines (or communicate early if you can’t)
- Don’t surprise your client with silent delays
Invest in communication skills
Your English, writing, and clarity matter almost as much as your code.Document more than you think you need
The next dev (maybe you in three months) will thank you.
9. Wrapping up
Remote + outsourced collaboration doesn’t have to be painful.
If you:
- Share context, not just tasks
- Write async-friendly tickets
- Make “done” explicit
- Use PRs as collaboration, not punishment
- Respect time zones while creating intentional overlap
…you can turn “outsourced team” into “distributed engineering org that actually ships.”
If you’re ever exploring working with a Software Outsourcing Company in India and want teams that care about code quality, communication, and long-term product health, feel free to check us out — but regardless of who you work with, I hope this post helps you build better remote collaborations.
Top comments (0)