DEV Community

Cover image for Exploring Alternative Libraries For HTTP Requests In Javascript
Saumya
Saumya

Posted on

Exploring Alternative Libraries For HTTP Requests In Javascript

Exploring Axios Alternatives: Top 5 Libraries for Making HTTP Requests
Axios has been a popular choice for making HTTP requests in JavaScript applications due to its simplicity and feature-rich API. However, as developers’ needs evolve, they often seek alternatives that provide similar functionality, enhanced performance, or better integration with their existing tech stack. Whether you’re looking for lighter libraries, modern alternatives, or tools that offer better error handling, this article will introduce some of the best alternatives to Axios.

1. Fetch API: The Native JavaScript Solution
Overview:
The Fetch API is a built-in web API available in modern browsers. It allows you to make HTTP requests in a more flexible and powerful way than the older XMLHttpRequest.

Key Features:
Native support (no need to install additional libraries).
Simpler and more readable syntax compared to XMLHttpRequest.
Returns promises, which makes it easier to work with asynchronous operations.
Handles response streams, allowing you to work with large responses incrementally.
Why Choose Fetch API:
Lightweight: It’s already included in the browser, so you don’t need to add an external dependency.
Modern: It works seamlessly with async/await and other modern JavaScript features.
Example:
javascript
Copy code
fetch('https://api.example.com/data')
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => console.log(data))
.catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));

Drawbacks:
No built-in support for request cancellation.
Error handling can be tricky since only network errors are considered failures, while non-200 status codes are considered successful responses.

2. SuperAgent: A Versatile Request Library

Overview:
SuperAgent is a robust and flexible HTTP request library. It works in both Node.js and the browser, offering a wide range of features such as request cancellation, query string parsing, and error handling.

Key Features:

Supports both promise-based and callback-based workflows.
Supports file uploads, redirection, and form submissions.
Works in browsers as well as Node.js.

Why Choose SuperAgent:

Feature-Rich: Offers more advanced features such as request progress tracking and middleware support.
Cross-Platform: Works well in both server and client environments.
Example:
javascript
Copy code
const superagent = require('superagent');
superagent
.get('https://api.example.com/data')
.then(response => console.log(response.body))
.catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));

Drawbacks:
Slightly larger than Fetch API or other alternatives.

3. Got: The Best Option for Node.js

Overview:
Got is a lightweight, promise-based HTTP request library specifically designed for Node.js. It offers better performance and more features than http.request, the native Node.js HTTP module.

Key Features:
Retry mechanism for failed requests.
Support for streams and advanced timeout handling.
Automatic decompression of response bodies.
Out-of-the-box JSON support.

Why Choose Got:
Node.js Optimized: If you’re building a server-side application, Got is optimized for Node.js.
Performance: Lighter and faster than Axios, with additional Node-specific features.
Example:
javascript
Copy code
const got = require('got');
(async () => {
try {
const response = await got('https://api.example.com/data');
console.log(response.body);
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error:', error.response.body);
}
})();

Drawbacks:
Primarily focused on Node.js, not suitable for front-end applications.

4. Ky: A Tiny and Elegant Fetch Wrapper

Overview:
Ky is a lightweight wrapper around the Fetch API, designed to simplify and enhance it with additional features such as better error handling, JSON parsing, and timeout support.

Key Features:

Built-in support for request retries.
Automatic JSON parsing for requests and responses.
Timeout and cancellation support.
Why Choose Ky:
Lightweight: Much smaller in size compared to Axios.
Simplifies Fetch API: Adds some of the missing features of Fetch API like timeout and JSON parsing.

Example:
javascript
Copy code
import ky from 'ky';
ky.get('https://api.example.com/data')
.json()
.then(data => console.log(data))
.catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));

Drawbacks:
Works only in the browser, not Node.js.

5. Request-Promise: Another Node.js Heavyweight

Overview:

Request-Promise is an extension of the request library in Node.js that adds promises. While the request library itself has been deprecated, Request-Promise is still widely used due to its extensive feature set.

Key Features:
Provides a promise-based interface for the request library.
Supports a variety of request methods and configurations.

Why Choose Request-Promise:

Feature-Rich: Ideal for developers who need robust features in their Node.js applications.
Promise-Based: Makes asynchronous workflows simpler to handle.
Example:
javascript
Copy code
const rp = require('request-promise');
rp('https://api.example.com/data')
.then(response => console.log(response))
.catch(error => console.error('Error:', error));

Drawbacks:

Slightly larger and more complex than Got or Axios.
As request is deprecated, you may want to consider other options for long-term projects.

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Alternative

While Axios remains a solid choice for HTTP requests, these alternatives offer unique advantages based on your needs:

  • Fetch API: Ideal for lightweight, modern, and browser-native requests.
  • SuperAgent: A feature-rich, cross-platform library for advanced use cases.
  • Got: The go-to solution for Node.js applications that prioritize performance and flexibility.
  • Ky: A minimal wrapper around Fetch for front-end developers who need additional features.
  • Request-Promise: For legacy projects still using the request module in Node.js, with promise support.

Axios alternatives have their strengths and weaknesses, so the best one depends on whether you’re building front-end or back-end applications, how critical performance is, and the complexity of your use case.

Top comments (0)