DEV Community

Sayed Rashid
Sayed Rashid

Posted on Originally published at gantry.work

Half of Singapore's Employers Won't Add Headcount in 2027. Here Is How You Grow Anyway.

#smallbusiness #automation #productivity #erp

More than half of Singapore's employers do not plan to add headcount in 2027. Just over half plan to freeze or moderate wages. That is the Singapore National Employers Federation's poll, released on 4 September, and if you run a small firm the honest reaction is probably: same here.

So the question for the next twelve months is not "how do we hire?" It is "how do we take on more work with the people we already have?" Four other stories from the same week in early September, none of them about hiring, answer that better than any HR guide I have read. A consumer payments study, an air cargo standard, a hospital group's advice to medtech founders, and a newspaper feature on AI and jobs. Read together, they are one instruction. I will take them in turn.

The poll, and the line in it that matters for small firms

SNEF surveyed over 300 companies employing close to 160,000 workers across 20 industries between June and August 2026. The headline numbers:

  • 54% do not plan to increase headcount in 2027. That is down from 58% a year ago, so marginally less frozen, not more.
  • 40% plan to hire, up from 33%. 6% plan to cut, down from 8%.
  • 51% plan wage moderation or a wage freeze, up from 48%.
  • 83% name rising manpower cost as their top challenge, up from 79%.
  • 30% worry about the cost of upskilling and reskilling their people, up from 23%.
  • 48% are prioritising AI exploration and adoption. 46% are prioritising upskilling.

The business outlook is actually a touch better than last year. Fewer employers expect uncertainty in 2027 (63%, down from 72%). But SNEF's own summary is the part to underline: "Small and medium-sized employers were more likely to report uncertain business prospects and poorer business performance, and were also more likely to implement wage moderation or wage freezes in 2027." Retail and F&B are named as the sectors under the most pressure. SNEF calls the economy K-shaped. The firms with the least slack are the ones being asked to hold the line.

Now put three of those numbers side by side. 83% say the cost of people is the problem. 48% say AI is part of the plan. 30% are nervous about what it costs to train people for that plan. That is a business saying: we need more output per person, we know software is part of the answer, and we are not sure what it takes to get there. The rest of this piece is about what it takes.

What "AI stealing jobs" looks like at twenty people

The Business Times ran a long feature on 4 September under the headline "Is AI stealing your job?" Its own answer, in the standfirst: white-collar workers risk displacement, but mass layoffs aren't on the table. It traces the debate back to May, when labour chief Ng Chee Meng tabled a motion calling for no "jobless growth", an economy that expands while job creation lags, and to Manpower Minister Tan See Leng's worry that AI could erode Singaporeans' skills and experience.

Set that next to the SNEF poll and you can see what "no jobless growth" looks like from the employer's chair. Nobody is being fired. Nobody is being hired. The order book still has to grow. The gap between those two lines is what your systems have to absorb.

I wrote on 7 September about why jobs are the wrong unit inside a small business. Nobody in a 20-person company has one job. Your operations person spends perhaps 40% of her week retyping, checking and chasing, and 60% on judgment. The exposed part is the 40%, not her. I will not repeat the argument. I will add the arithmetic. A distributor doing 90 orders a day that grows 15% next year is doing 104 orders a day with the same team. If every order is still retyped from email into the system, that is 14 more retypes a day, every day, landing on someone who was already full. Either the retyping goes, or the growth does.

Your customers just told you how they want automation to behave

The most useful study of that week was not about employers at all. Ant International and S&P Global surveyed 6,000 consumers across nine markets in Asia, Europe and the United States about how they pay when they travel. Singaporeans, alongside consumers in China, Thailand and Malaysia, showed the strongest demand for integrated experiences inside a single app, well ahead of Japan, Germany and Western markets.

Then the two numbers that matter. 81% of consumers use AI tools for travel discovery and planning. Only 26% are interested in using AI for payments and autonomous decision-making. 43% cite privacy concerns, two in five prefer to plan themselves, and a third want human advice. Even on ordinary mobile payments, which 63% now use for most of their spending abroad, 62% worry about transaction security and one in four still carry cash as a fallback.

That is a design brief, and it applies inside your company as much as it applies to your customers.

First, everything in one place. If Singaporeans want the whole trip in one app, your customers want one place to order, pay, track and ask a question. Your staff want exactly the same thing internally. Every extra system is a tab someone has to remember to check, and the retyping between tabs is where the 40% lives.

Second, automate the research and keep a human at the money. 81 versus 26 is the rule. People are happy for software to do the looking: which stock is low, which customer is late, which quote has sat unanswered for four days. They want a person on the button when money moves. Most of the failed automation projects I have seen got this backwards. They automated the payment or the posting and left the research manual, so the team spent its week gathering information for a machine to act on. Flip it. Let the system prepare the reorder, the reminder, the draft invoice. A person approves. I laid out the approval thresholds that make this safe in The 3AM Purchase Order, and why every payment method is also an accounting object in the Stripe reconciliation piece.

The air cargo industry is retiring paper. Copy the principle, not the technology.

Singapore's air cargo community is working with hubs in the Netherlands, Qatar and the United States to adopt IATA's ONE Record standard. The technical detail is that it replaces the old batch messaging formats, Cargo-IMP and Cargo-XML, and the paper that travelled with them, with a single live digital record per shipment that everyone in the chain reads through web APIs. Customs officers see shipment data on screen during inspection instead of reconciling a stack of documents. Singapore's particular angle is pharmaceuticals, where live temperature and humidity readings from sensors attach directly to the shipment record, so cold-chain compliance is proven before the pallet touches the tarmac.

You do not need any of that technology. You need the principle, which is the one-record rule. One shipment, one record, and the forwarder, the handler, the airline and the regulator all read from it rather than re-keying it into their own systems.

Now count how many times one customer order gets re-keyed in your firm. Email to quote. Quote to sales order. Sales order to picking list. Picking list to delivery note. Delivery note to invoice. Invoice to the collections spreadsheet. Five or six retypes, each one an hour of somebody's week and an error waiting to happen. Allied Container found that the first 25% of its efficiency gain was just filing. If global freight, with its regulators and its dangerous-goods declarations, can agree on one record per shipment, a 20-person trading firm can agree on one record per order.

"Build with, not for": the medtech rule that applies to your back office

SingHealth is the Healthcare Innovation Partner at Medical Fair Asia, which runs at Marina Bay Sands from 9 to 11 September alongside Medical Manufacturing Asia and the first RehaCare Asia. Its message to the medtech companies exhibiting there is blunt. Associate Professor Goh Su Yen, SingHealth's group director for innovation and transformation, puts it this way: "There is a significant gap between a promising idea and a solution that can be adopted in healthcare." And: "Discussions about healthcare innovation often centre on the technology itself. We want to shift that conversation towards what it actually takes for an innovation to work in practice."

SingHealth's answer, through its Alice Lee Innovation Centre of Excellence, is to bring clinicians into product development early, rather than presenting them with a finished product and hoping it fits. The example it gives is an AI triage tool for chest-pain patients, co-developed with clinician-researchers at Singapore General Hospital, built around a problem the doctors on the ground identified first.

Swap "hospital" for "warehouse" and "clinician" for "your operations lead" and you have the reason most small-business system projects fail. The owner chooses the software. A vendor configures it. The team is shown the result on go-live day. Within a week the person who does the actual work has found the three things that do not fit how orders really arrive, and the spreadsheet is back. Goh's gap between a promising idea and an adopted one is exactly that week.

The fix costs about two hours a week of your ops lead's time for eight weeks. She sits in every design session. She owns the layout of the screens she will use every day. She decides what the exception looks like when a customer wants a partial delivery. You will lose some of her output during those eight weeks. You will get a system people use instead of a system people route around.

A 90-day plan for growing on flat headcount

Here is how I would run the next quarter if I had just read the SNEF poll and recognised my own firm in it.

  1. Weeks 1 and 2: the hours audit. Everyone lists their recurring tasks and the hours each takes per week. Mark each one as retype, check, chase or decide. The first three are candidates for a system. The fourth is where you want your people spending more of their time. If you want to put a dollar figure on the first three, the free calculators do the arithmetic.
  2. Weeks 3 and 4: pick one flow and apply the one-record rule. Order to cash, or purchase to pay, not both. Draw the current path of one order and count the retypes. The target is one entry that flows through quote, order, delivery and invoice without being keyed again.
  3. Weeks 5 to 10: build with the doer. Weekly sessions, the ops lead in the room, screens designed around how the work actually arrives. Test with last month's real orders, including the ugly ones.
  4. Set the money rule before go-live. Decide the thresholds. Below a value, the system acts and logs it. Above it, a named person approves. Your customers told you this is what they trust. Your team will trust it too.
  5. Weeks 11 to 13: measure and show the team. Orders handled per person per week. Days from delivery to invoice. Hours in the retype, check and chase columns compared with week one. Then show people where the recovered hours went, because that is the answer to the 30% of employers worried about the cost of upskilling. The cheapest reskilling programme is a system that removes the low-value tasks so people learn the higher-value ones on the job.

Why so many Singapore SMEs stall at the AI pilot stage is mostly step two being skipped. There is no single record for the AI to read, so the pilot runs on exports and dies when the person doing the exports goes on leave.

The one thing to take from the week

Five headlines, one instruction. Employers are planning for fewer people per dollar of revenue. Consumers want everything in one place and a human at the money. Freight is moving to one record per shipment. Hospitals are telling builders to design with the people who do the work. And the jobs debate, once you shrink it to twenty people, is a debate about tasks.

If you do only one thing this quarter, find the flow with the most retyping and give it one record. Everything else in the list gets easier once that exists.

Which order in your business gets typed the most times before the customer pays for it?

Sources

I'm Sayed. I work closely with business owners to automate their operations and build workflows that actually make sense. I write The Gantry about ERP and automation for SMEs. If this was useful, the archive has the rest.

Originally published at The Gantry on 9 September 2026.

Top comments (0)