Hi folks — I’m building MCPBench to make it easier to discover and evaluate MCP servers. The goal is simple: reduce the time from “what’s out there?” to “I found the right server”.
The problem I keep hearing
- “Will this MCP really work for my use case?”
- “Do we have any real data on these integrations?”
- “Will the MCP work in conjunction with my system prompt & other context?”
What shipped this week
- A faster server browser with richer filters and “star” saves
- Per‑server pages with packages/remotes and quick links
Why this matters
- MCP is growing fast; a clear map helps authors and users meet in the middle
- Consistent classification unlocks better filters and future compare views
Open question for you
- Does our deployment framing (localhost / self‑hosted / hosted) match how you think about MCP servers?
- If not, what would you change or add?
What’s next
- Visualizations of registry (leaderboards, weekly trends)
- Details on available tools
- Drafting “config/install” snippets to get to first run faster
- A lightweight compare view for side‑by‑side evaluation
Try it and tell me what breaks
- Browse servers: mcpbench.ai
I’d love your feedback in the comments — or ping me on X/LinkedIn. If you publish an MCP server and want it highlighted, drop a link and what makes it special.
Thanks for reading — building this in public and shipping weekly.
Top comments (0)