
Imagine that you published a big open source project and many people are currently changing your code or updating the project documents.
what if s...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
I have no words. This is completely ridiculous
true π€£π€π»
Also, this kind of thing (whether a document is not 'inclusive', or is 'offensive') should be determined/resolved by the normal process of PRs and review/discussion - not arbitrary decision making by a dumb model that has no idea or understanding about context, sarcasm, intent, etc.
This really feels like a solution looking for a problem.
Might be useful for checking and refactoring old documents, but I agree that you should not just treat the this tools as an end all solution.
thank you for your feedback π€
What is this abormination?!!! Why would anyone spending their time to create such a tasteless tool like this? What a waste of time!
π
People don't understand. π
I can understand, though. π
Is this a late April Fools?
Maybe, who knows! ππ
Lol good luck writing "merged changes to 'master'"
π«‘
Humanity is doomed.
However, it can still be viewed as a fun tool. π
Seems like a great little tool! Thank you for bringing it to my attention :)
Thank you for your positive feedback! π€
Thankyou, our code can now be censored according to your moral code. I was thinking maybe a way for us to separate acceptances but.. I dont think its possible. This tool is biased before it starts. It'd just a don't get cancelled linter.
So this library has a list of keywords and loops through the text to return the ones in the list?
But somehow, is very importantΒΏ
I feel offended by this tool π€£
Wow the levels that we are reaching now. We are doomed π
I am slowly thinking that it would have been better if I had not used the example in the documentation of this tool π΅π·
The situation is getting worse π€£π€£
Nice little joke you got there. Probably some conservative who wants promote the anti woke movement. They'll follow up with a post against wokeness on Twitter or Reddit
Unnecessary.
thank you for your feedback sir π«‘π
Yet another example of how to build a cluttered build pipeline.
π
The example used is crazy. The tool would be helpful if it checked specifically for slurs and derogatory language.
Iβm not sure but I think it detects slurs too
Lol....What is available in these days is unbelievable.
I'm always surprised π€£
If I say that the idea of ββthis project has been around for a long time and it has only become more complete, it might spoil it more ππ€£
I can see value the value in this tool...
But the example is purely engagement-bait isn't it?
I don't blame you. The number of comments speaks for itself, mine included. π€·ββοΈ
I used the example of the documentation in here But I am pleased to see that it is driving engagement. π€ππ
What the hell has happened to the freaking world? What's next? Enforcing git branch names?!?!! Oh wait ..
What a waste of time and energy.
Thank you for your feedback sir π«‘