DEV Community

Spark
Spark

Posted on

NHS Jobs will not let you upload a CV, and that changes all the advice

If you are applying for a developer role at NHS England, an NHS trust, or through the Civil Service, the CV you spent a weekend polishing is not going to be read. Not because it is bad. Because there is nowhere to put it.

NHS Jobs states it in their own help article, in one sentence: "You cannot upload your CV to NHS Jobs service."

That page has been viewed just over six thousand times at the time of writing, which tells you roughly how many people discover this at the worst possible moment.

It is stricter than "no upload"

There is a second option that sounds like a reprieve and is not.

When an employer posts a vacancy, they can allow applicants to apply using an online application form or a "CV application". If they pick the CV route, you still do not attach a file. You copy and paste the contents of your CV into a mandatory section, next to these, which are required either way:

  • Contact details
  • Right to work status
  • Your CV, as typed text
  • Unspent criminal convictions and cautions
  • Guaranteed interview scheme questions

So the "CV application" is still a form. There is no path through NHS Jobs that accepts a document. Civil Service is a different system with the same shape of problem: Success Profiles, written statements of around 250 words per behaviour, frequently blind sifted so the reviewer sees neither your name nor your employer.

Why this breaks the advice you have been given

Nearly all job hunting advice aimed at developers assumes an applicant tracking system. Get the keywords in, keep the formatting machine readable, run it through a free checker, upload, move on. That advice is fine, and several of those checkers are genuinely good.

None of it applies here. These applications are scored by a person against a published person specification, criterion by criterion.

What actually changes:

Keyword density does nothing. A human is checking whether you evidenced each listed criterion. Evidence, not vocabulary. Salting your application with terms from the advert is at best neutral and at worst reads as padding to someone who has sifted two hundred of these.

Your employer's name does nothing under a blind sift. "Senior engineer at a company you have heard of" is exactly as persuasive as the same sentence with the company removed, because the company is removed. Everything has to be carried by what you did.

The marking scheme is published in advance. That is the genuinely good news, and most applicants waste it. The person specification lists essential and desirable criteria. Answer them in the order they are printed and you have made the sifter's job trivial. Answer them in your own preferred order and you have made them hunt for points they are allowed to award you zero for not finding.

The real cost is retyping. Every trust runs its own recruitment. Apply to ten and you will type the same employment history, the same dates, the same referees, the same right to work answers into ten fresh sets of boxes. This is where the hours actually go, and it is not the interesting part of applying for a job.

What I built, and what it does not do

That last point is the one I could fix, so I did. Still Applying is mine, so treat it as disclosed: you enter your history once and a browser extension fills it into the application form you have open. It is triggered from the toolbar on whatever page you are on, rather than from a fixed list of supported career sites, which matters here because NHS trusts and Civil Service departments are exactly the sites that never appear on those lists.

Being straight about the limits, because in this context they are large:

  • It does not write your person specification evidence for you. That is the part that gets you sifted in, and it is yours.
  • It shows an ATS compatibility score, and on an NHS application that number is close to meaningless. It is scoring a CV, and as above, a CV is not the instrument being used. Ignore it here.

So the tool saves you the retyping. It does not save you the thinking, and any tool claiming otherwise for this particular process is selling you something.

The habit that is worth more than any of it: before you apply anywhere in the NHS, open the person specification and the application form side by side, and answer the criteria in the order they are printed. It costs nothing and almost nobody does it.

Enter your history once at stillapplying.com

Jake

Top comments (0)