Thank you!
I wonder how it has changed with new releases like Helidon 4.0 with Java 21 and virtual threads. Also, my understanding is that Helidon and similar frameworks are typically used for building optimized services with GraalVM (and even Spring Boot supports it from version 3.0), which should yield drastically different results.
It's been a couple of years since touching GraalVM with Micronaut and Helidon. My biggest pain point was it crashing seemingly randomly when performing analysis which just wasted time so I lost interest. Hopefully that has improved. I found using JLink and CDS was the better compromise between startup performance, developer productivity and reducing image size. I'm using Helidon 4 SE on my current project and no complaints.
Thank you!
I wonder how it has changed with new releases like Helidon 4.0 with Java 21 and virtual threads. Also, my understanding is that Helidon and similar frameworks are typically used for building optimized services with GraalVM (and even Spring Boot supports it from version 3.0), which should yield drastically different results.
It's been a couple of years since touching GraalVM with Micronaut and Helidon. My biggest pain point was it crashing seemingly randomly when performing analysis which just wasted time so I lost interest. Hopefully that has improved. I found using JLink and CDS was the better compromise between startup performance, developer productivity and reducing image size. I'm using Helidon 4 SE on my current project and no complaints.
Thank you!