Artificial intelligence didn’t arrive quietly.
It arrived with headlines, fear, excitement, grand promises and — increasingly — regulation.
But while leaders debate “AI strategy,” something else is happening quietly inside organisations.
Employees have already adopted AI.
They’re using tools to draft emails, summarise documents, analyse data, brainstorm ideas, and even generate legal or medical text — often without approvals, controls, or governance.
That invisible layer is what I call Shadow AI — and it may be the most misunderstood AI risk today.
What Shadow AI Actually Looks Like
Shadow AI isn’t malicious.
In most cases, it looks like this:
A manager pastes internal reports into a public AI tool.
A teacher uploads student information to generate feedback.
A junior analyst feeds confidential financial data into a chatbot.
A healthcare worker “tests” patient symptoms inside an AI assistant.
Nobody intends harm.
They’re trying to save time, improve accuracy, or simply keep up with expectations.
But there’s a problem.
Once information leaves the organisation’s ecosystem, leaders no longer control:
where it is stored
who can access it
whether it is reused to train other systems
whether copies exist forever
Even if the AI vendor claims strong privacy controls, leaders rarely know what employees are doing — or what data has already left the building.
Why Education And Policies Alone Are Not Enough
Most organisations respond to AI in one of two ways:
1️⃣ They ba
n it entirely.
2️⃣ They publish guidelines and hope people follow them.
Both approaches fail.
When AI is banned, people quietly use it anyway — just out of sight.
When policies exist without governance, employees tick compliance boxes while still improvising with the tools that help them work faster.
Shadow AI grows either way.
This isn’t a “bad people” problem.
It is a governance problem.
Governance Means Controlling Actions, Not Just Tools
From my perspective, responsible AI isn’t primarily about the model.
It’s about what AI-touched work is allowed to do.
Become a member
Drafting an email?
Reasonably low risk.
Sending an email that was fully generated by AI — to thousands of customers — without human oversight?
Very different.
That’s why organisations need both:
policy — what employees should or should not do
governance gates — what actually leaves the building
In practical terms, that means:
sensitive data cannot be pasted into external tools
AI outputs must be reviewed before execution
high-risk actions require approvals
activity is logged transparently
When governance exists, AI becomes less scary — because nothing important happens automatically.
A Simple Starting Framework: SAFE AI
To make this easier for non-technical teams, I use a simple approach I call SAFE AI:
S — Set rules
Define clearly what data is allowed, what is prohibited, and why.
A — Approve tools
Provide secure, organisation-approved AI platforms instead of leaving people to experiment.
F — Filter sensitive data
Personal, confidential, strategic or regulated data should never leave protected environments.
E — Educate everyone
AI literacy is now part of professional responsibility — not just an IT topic.
This isn’t meant to slow AI down.
It is meant to build trust and accountability, so AI can scale without creating reputational or legal damage.
AI Won’t Slow Down — Governance Must Catch Up
AI isn’t going away.
Tools will become faster, more available, and easier to hide.
Leaders have a simple choice:
Ignore it
— or —
Build systems that manage it responsibly.
Shadow AI is not the villain.
Unmanaged AI is.
We don’t need fear.
We need governance, clarity and responsible leadership.
— Japmandeep Singh Ahluwalia (Sunny)
Top comments (0)