DEV Community

Cover image for Introduction to Microservice Architecture
Tamerlan Gudabayev
Tamerlan Gudabayev

Posted on • Updated on • Originally published at

Introduction to Microservice Architecture

It can be very intimidating designing a backend system. There are many different variations and so many buzz words such as:

  • Service Orientated Architecture
  • Event-Driven Architecture
  • Model-View-Controller
  • Layered
  • Client-Server

As it turns out, the process of choosing an architecture is a lot simpler. You just gotta know the pros and cons of each one and pick the one that suits your project needs. But first, you need to have a solid understanding of each architectural pattern, so this is why in this post we cover one of the most popular architectural patterns, the microservice.

You'll learn:

  • Basics of software architecture
  • Pros and cons of the monolith architecture
  • Pros and cons of microservices
  • Basics of design pattern


Before we move on to the gritty details of microservices, we first have to cover the basic terminology.

What is software architecture?

Architecture, in a nutshell, is the decisions that you wish you had made early on in the project.

Architecture is the skeleton of the project. It is the hard decisions you make early on that determine the foundation of the project. It's this foundation that greatly influences the quality of code, ease of development and deployment, maintainability, and evolvability.

Examples of architecture:

  • Client-Server
  • Monolith
  • Model-View-Controller (MVC)
  • Event-Driven

What is monolith architecture?

You might be thinking, isn't this post about microservices, why is this idiot talking about monolith?

The reason is that to understand what problems does the microservice architecture fix, we gotta first understand the problems that the old traditional monolithic architecture give.

Okay, moving on.

The word monolith means "composed all in one place", in software terms it means having a single application, made up of different components, combined into a single program from a single platform.

Components may include:

  • Authorization - responsible for authorizing the user
  • Presentation - responsible for handling HTTP requests, and responding back with HTML or JSON/XML (if it's an API)
  • Business logic - the business logic of the application
  • Database layer - responsible for communicating with the database
  • Application integration - responsible for integrating with other services (using REST API or messaging) or any other data source.
  • Notification module - responsible for sending notifications.

Alt Text

For years monolithic applications have been industry default because it's simple. All code is in one place, it's simple to test, and deploy. But as application size grows, there are some major drawbacks that get introduced.

What are the problems with monolithic architecture?

  • Maintenance - as the codebase increases, it becomes harder to make changes.
  • The large code base intimidates developers, especially new ones. Which will lead to decreased productivity.
  • Overloaded IDE - the larger the code base, the slower the IDE and the less productive developers will be.
  • Startup time - the larger the application, the more time it will take to launch the application, in turn will lead to decreased productivity.
  • Deployment - in order to update one component, your gonna have to redeploy the whole application. This might interrupt background tasks, and possibly cause problems.
  • Scaling - monolithic applications are hard to scale because different modules may have different resource requirements.
  • Scaling to development teams - as an application gets bigger, it would be advisable to separate developers into teams per module. For example, a team for the payments module, and another team for the products module. In a monolithic architecture, everything is coupled together, making it hard for teams to work independently. This forces the teams to coordinate their development and deployments. In turn, making it difficult to make changes and update production.
  • Tech stack - Monolithic architecture forces you to stick to one technology (sometimes even a specific version of that technology). It's very hard to adopt new technology due to the fact that changing the language or framework will affect the whole application.

What is a microservice?

The microservice architecture is an approach to software development, in which a large application is made up of a suite of modular services (i.e loosely coupled modules/components). A good analogy would be legos, where each set of blocks corresponds to a component. Additionally, a group of connected components would create a full-fledged application.

Alt Text

Each module/service has a single business goal and uses simple interfaces to communicate with other services. Another feature of services is that, unlike the monolith application where you share a single database, microservices follow the approach of database per service. This ensures loose coupling, and the service can use the database that best suits its needs.

Pros of Microservices

  • Enable the continuous development and deployment of large complex applications.
    • Improves maintainability - each service is small, so it's much easier to make changes.
    • Better testability - services are smaller and faster to test.
    • Better deployability - each service can be deployed independently
    • Enables teams to be independent - teams can get full responsibility for a single or set of services. Each team can develop, test, deploy, and scale their services independently of all other teams.
  • Each microservice is relatively small:
    • Less complexity, easier to understand
    • Smaller code base, making the IDE fast.
    • The application starts faster, which makes developers much more productive, and speeds up deployments.
  • Improved fault isolation. If one service faces issues, then only that service will be affected. The other services will continue normally. Unlike monolithic architecture, one misbehaving component can bring down the entire system.
  • Better evolvability - when developing a new service, you can use a new technology stack. Similarly, when making major changes to an existing service, you can rewrite the whole service in a new stack.

Cons of Microservices

  • Developers must deal with the additional complexity of creating a distributed system:
    • Developers must implement the inter-service communication mechanism and deal with partial failure
    • Implementing requests that span multiple services is more difficult.
    • Testing the interactions between services is more difficult.
    • Implementing requests that span multiple services requires careful coordination between the teams.
    • Developer tools/IDEs are oriented toward building monolithic applications and don’t provide explicit support for developing distributed applications.
  • Deployment complexity - in production, there is additional complexity in deploying and managing a system compromised of many different services.
  • Increased memory consumption. The microservice architecture replaces N monolithic application instances with NxM services instances. If each service runs in its own JVM (or equivalent), which is usually necessary to isolate the instances, then there is the overhead of M times as many JVM runtimes. Moreover, if each service runs on its own VM (e.g. EC2 instance), as is the case at Netflix, the overhead is even higher.

Microservice Design Patterns

You cannot use the microservice architecture alone, there are many different design patterns that solve the same problems in different ways, and it's your job as the developer to choose which one best fits your project.

An example may be:

How to decompose the application into services?

Here you can use different design patterns:

  • Decompose by business capability and define services corresponding to business capabilities.
  • Decompose by domain-driven design subdomain.
  • Decompose by verb or use case and define services that are responsible for particular actions. e.g. a Shipping Service that’s responsible for shipping complete orders.
  • Decompose by nouns or resources by defining a service that is responsible for all operations on entities/resources of a given type. e.g. an Account Service that is responsible for managing user accounts.

What are patterns?

Design patterns are typical solutions to commonly occurring problems in software design. They are like pre-made blueprints that you can customize to solve a recurring design problem in your code.

You can't just find and copy a pattern. Patterns do not provide any code but provide a general concept for solving a specific problem.

What are the types of microservices patterns?

Microservices have lots of patterns, to make it easier, we have separated the patterns into three categories based on their relationships to one another.

  • Predecessor – a predecessor pattern is a pattern that motivates the need for this pattern. For example, the Microservice Architecture pattern is the predecessor to the rest of the patterns in the pattern language except the monolithic architecture pattern.
  • Successor – a pattern that solves an issue that is introduced by this pattern. For example, if you apply the Microservice Architecture pattern you must then apply numerous successor patterns including service discovery patterns and the Circuit Breaker pattern.
  • Alternative – a pattern that provides an alternative solution to this pattern. For example, the Monolithic Architecture pattern and the Microservice Architecture pattern are alternative ways of architecting an application. You pick one or the other. These relationships provide valuable guidance when using a pattern language. Applying a pattern creates issues that you must then address by applying successor patterns. The selection of patterns continuously recursively until you reach patterns with no successor. If two or more patterns are alternatives then you must typically pick just one. In many ways, this is similar to traversing a graph.


Congratulations, you now know enough to go forth in your journey of being a software architect. The journey doesn't stop here, make sure to check out for more details on microservices.

Top comments (9)

omrisama profile image
Omri Gabay

Why didn't you mention any of the pros of Monolithic architecture? I thought that was in the table of contents?

Not to mention, Monoliths can decrease productivity in some ways but increase it in other ways; and the same for microservices. Really, the division makes sense based on how you organize your dev teams and how your business units are structured.

Also, it might be useful to talk about Service Oriented Architecture as a whole before just mentioning microservicws straight up. A lot of applications will fall in between; my workplace uses SOA, but we don't use microservices.

tamerlang profile image
Tamerlan Gudabayev

Hi, I've briefly said "For years monolithic applications have been industry default because it's simple. All code is in one place, it's simple to test, and deploy." and about service oriented architecture, your right. I should've mentioned that first, I will update the post. Thanks for the feedback!

siy profile image
Sergiy Yevtushenko
  • Monolith
  • Macroservices
  • Miniservices
  • Microservices

None of these are architectures, in fact.

tamerlang profile image
Tamerlan Gudabayev

would you mind elaborating?

siy profile image
Sergiy Yevtushenko • Edited

If they would be architectures, then for each of them we would be able to draw a diagram. For each architecture - its own diagram. But if we do that, we'll get the same diagram as for SOA. Because they all are just different packaging option for SOA. Calling them "architectures" misleading and causes a lot of harm. In particular, it prevents many from making rational choice of the architecture for particular task. Instead all of them building microservices - fragile decentralized network of loosely coupled services, one of the hardest to do right variants of the distributed systems.

Thread Thread
tamerlang profile image
Tamerlan Gudabayev

yea, that makes sense. I updated the post, thanks for the feedback

hasnaindev profile image
Muhammad Hasnain • Edited

Once again, great post. Personally, I don't call monolithic codebase an architecture. I call it codebase instead because I don't think monolithic codebase were consciously introduced to solve a specific problem. It is just a natural, default and traditional way of doing things.

detzam profile image

A note: in the present there are software (application) microservices but also hardware the way you use different server types in a application.
Am i right?

tamerlang profile image
Tamerlan Gudabayev

I guess so, there's nothing stopping a service to use a different server type.
I've found this paper online, might be useful