DEV Community

Cover image for Basic Recipes for React Testing Library
TK
TK

Posted on • Originally published at leandrotk.github.io

Basic Recipes for React Testing Library

This article was originally published at Tk's blog.

Last year I attended a conference called Clojure South where we had a lot of cool tech talks about functional programming and the programming language Clojure.

One of the talks I really liked was about Clojure Spec & Generative Tests by David Chelimsky. He was part of the Rspec team and he works in the clojure.spec team.

He started his talk asking

Why do you make tests?

"Confidence" said someone in the audience. Confidence that your software works as expected.

But tests only give confidence if we add tests that make sense. So it's important to have best practices and adjust the mindset to test properly.

Side note: In my opinion, having bad tests is worse than having any tests at all. Without tests, you are aware that you need tests in the future or that you will need to manually test your software before shipping to production. With bad tests, you think the tests cover good parts of your product, but they actually don't.

Thinking about this, I wanted to play around with React Testing Library to provide good examples of what and how to test properly. So I created a playground to, well, play with the Testing Library in some different contexts.

So, for this post, we will talk about theses topics:

  • How to query
  • How to verify content
  • How to handle forms
  • How to handle loading and fetching/async operations

So let's get started!

How to query

We have three main ways to get elements from the DOM: getBy, queryBy, and findBy.

All of these queries have different variants. For example, the getBy query has some variants like getByRole and getByLabelText. Depending on the context, you better use one over the others. But to simplify this process, the Testing Library docs has a section called [Which query should I use?](https://testing-library.com/docs/guide-which-query) that explains the priority of one query over the others thinking about accessibility and semantics.

getBy

Before start using the getBy query, let's see what we are testing.

import React from 'react';

const Queries = () => <h1>Title</h1>;

export default Queries;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This a simple component called Queries that renders a title with a text Title.

In this first test, we want to know if it renders the proper text. To query the element (<h1>), we'll be using the getBy. More specifically, we'll try the getByText.

import React from 'react';
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import Queries from '../Queries';

describe('getBy', () => {
  it('title is in the document', () => {
    render(<Queries />);

    const title = screen.getByText(/title/i);

    expect(title).toBeInTheDocument();
  });
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

So here it is the first test. As simple as it looks.

  • We use the render function from the testing library to render the component we want to test
  • Query by the text title together with the screen function from the testing library.
  • In the query, we use the regular expression to not have the problem of upper or lower case.
  • And finally we expect to have this element title in the DOM.

We'll talk about this toBeInTheDocument method later. But we basically want to use this matcher to expect that title is in the DOM.

One specific "feature" the getBy has is to throw an error if it doesn't find the element in the rendered component. Let's see it in action.

it('verify no element', () => {
  render(<Queries />);

  try {
    screen.getByText(/subtitle/i);
  } catch (e) {
    console.log('Did not find nonexistent element');
  }
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

If you run this test, the subtitle text doesn't exist and it will throw an error. As we use the try-catch, when we run the test, it will log the text Did not find nonexistent element in your terminal.

queryBy

queryBy has the same feature as the getBy. The main difference is that the queryBy doesn't throw an error if it doesn't find a given element in the DOM. Let's do the same implementation we did with getBy, but now with queryBy.

import React from 'react';
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import Queries from '../Queries';

describe('queryBy', () => {
  it('title is in the document', () => {
    render(<Queries />);

    const title = screen.queryByText(/title/i);

    expect(title).toBeInTheDocument();
  });
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The happy path works the same way. Here we use the queryByText to get the title element and expect it to be in the document.

But now when it doesn't find an element:

it('verify no element', () => {
  render(<Queries />);

  const subtitle = screen.queryByText(/subtitle/i);

  expect(subtitle).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

It won't throw an error. Here we can use the queryByText without the try-catch and try to get the subtitle element.

We use the .not together with the toBeInTheDocument matcher to expect that the subtitle is not in the DOM.

The queryBy is very useful when we want to make sure that the page is not showing an element.

findBy

The findBy always returns a promise. And the promise resolves when it finds the element we are searching for.

It's very useful when the element is not the DOM. But the element appears after a specific event. Let's see an example:

import React, { useState } from 'react';

const Queries = () => {
  const [isParagraphVisible, setIsParagraphVisible] = useState(false);

  return (
    <>
      <button onClick={() => setIsParagraphVisible(true)}>Show paragraph</button>
      {isParagraphVisible ? <p>A paragraph</p> : null}
    </>
  )
};

export default Queries;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

So here it is a simple component where we have a button and a logic to show or not a paragraph.

At the top of the component, we use a useState hook to just manage the state to show or hide the paragraph. If the user click the button, it will show the paragraph. This is the "feature".

Now we can use the findBy to query a paragraph, after clicking in the button.

import React from 'react';
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
import Queries from '../Queries';

describe('findBy', () => {
  it('paragraph is in the document', async () => {
    render(<Queries />);

    const button = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /show paragraph/i });
    fireEvent.click(button);

    const paragraph = await screen.findByText(/a paragraph/i);
    expect(paragraph).toBeInTheDocument();
  });
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • First we render the Queries component.
  • Get the button with the getByRole query.
  • We use the fireEvent function from the testing library to mimic the click in the button.
  • And now we finally try to get the paragraph with the findByText.
  • After getting the paragraph, we make sure it is in the document.
  • As the findBy query returns a promise, we can use the .then method or the await to get the real element. As we used the await in this example, we need to add an async statement in the it block.

A common example to use findBy is when we do an asynchronous operation like fetching an API for some data, so we need to wait until we have the data rendered in the dom to get the elements we want to verify that are there.

The findBy also throws an error when it doesn't find an element like the getBy.

it('verify no other item', async () => {
  render(<Queries />);

  const button = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /show paragraph/i });
  fireEvent.click(button);

  try {
    await screen.findByText(/another paragraph/i);
  } catch (e) {
    console.log('Did not find nonexistent element');
  }
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In this test, I added a try-catch to see that the findByText really throws an error.

How to expect content

There are many ways to verify the correct content in the page or component. But one I like the most is the matcher .toBeInTheDocument.

The .toBeInTheDocument is matcher from the [jest-dom library](https://github.com/testing-library/jest-dom) from the testing library org. There other custom jest matchers we can use too.

We use this matcher in all the queries examples. But one thing that is cool to mention is that we don't need to import the matchers if we import the jest-dom in the setupTests.js like this:

// setupTests.js
import '@testing-library/jest-dom/extend-expect';
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

So now the expect function from jest is extended to use all the matchers from the jest-dom.

How to handle forms

We can also handle forms with the testing library. The best practice is to use the [@testing-library/user-event library](https://github.com/testing-library/user-event). This library simulates the real interactions between users and browsers.

Before starting to test, let's the simple form we want to test.

import React from 'react';

export const Form = () => (
  <>
    <h1>Form</h1>

    <form>
      <div>
        <label htmlFor="name">Name</label>
        <input id="name" name="name" />
      </div>

      <div>
        <label htmlFor="age">Age</label>
        <input id="age" name="age" type="number" />
      </div>

      <div>
        <label htmlFor="birthday">Birthday</label>
        <input id="birthday" name="birthday" type="date" />
      </div>

      <div>
        Hobbies:
        <input type="checkbox" name="coding" id="coding" value="coding" />
        <label htmlFor="coding">Coding</label>
        <input type="checkbox" name="reading" id="reading" value="reading" />
        <label htmlFor="reading">Reading</label>
        <input type="checkbox" name="writing" id="writing" value="writing" />
        <label htmlFor="writing">Writing</label>
      </div>

      <div>
        OS:
        <input type="radio" name="windows" id="windows" value="windows" />
        <label htmlFor="windows">Windows</label>
        <input type="radio" name="mac" id="mac" value="mac" />
        <label htmlFor="mac">Mac</label>
        <input type="radio" name="linux" id="linux" value="linux" />
        <label htmlFor="linux">Linux</label>
      </div>

      <div>
        <label>Favorite city?</label>
        <select id="favcity" name="favcity" data-testid="favcity">
          <option value="1">Amsterdam</option>
          <option value="2">Hong Kong</option>
          <option value="3">London</option>
          <option value="4">New York</option>
          <option value="5">Sao Paulo</option>
          <option value="6">Tokyo</option>
        </select>
      </div>

      <div>
        <label>Countries you want to visit</label>
        <div>
          <select id="countries" name="countries" data-testid="countries" multiple>
            <option value="Brazil">Brazil</option>
            <option value="Japan">Japan</option>
            <option value="New Zealand">Italy</option>
            <option value="Germany">Germany</option>
            <option value="India">India</option>
            <option value="Netherlands">Netherlands</option>
          </select>
        </div>
      </div>

      <button type="submit">
        Submit
      </button>
    </form>
  </>
);

export default Form;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Wow! A lot of stuff here. But let's break down each part of the form (and see that it's not that scary). We want to test a lot of different kind of elements (input, select, multi-select, radio button, checkbox, etc):

  • A text input for the name
  • A number input for the age
  • A date input for the birthdate
  • A checkbox for hobbies
  • A radio button for operating system
  • A select for favorite city
  • A multi-select for countries I want to visit

That's it! We want to fill, select, and check all these elements with the testing library, and finally click the submit button.

First thing we always do: render the component.

render(<Form />);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

And then we use the screen together with the getBy query to get the form fields.

const nameInput = screen.getByLabelText(/name/i);
const ageInput = screen.getByLabelText(/age/i);
const birthdayInput = screen.getByLabelText(/birthday/i);

const codingCheckbox = screen.getByLabelText(/coding/i);
const readingCheckbox = screen.getByLabelText(/reading/i);
const writingCheckbox = screen.getByLabelText(/writing/i);

const osRadio = screen.getByLabelText(/mac/i);

const favCitySelect = screen.getByTestId(/favcity/i);
const tokyoOption = screen.getByText(/tokyo/i);

const countriesMultiSelect = screen.getByTestId(/countries/i);
const japanOption = screen.getByText(/japan/i);
const germanyOption = screen.getByText(/germany/i);
const netherlandsOption = screen.getByText(/netherlands/i);

const button = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i });
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Text, number, and date inputs

And finally we fill the input fields with the type function:

userEvent.type(nameInput, 'TK');
userEvent.type(ageInput, '24');
userEvent.type(birthdayInput, '01/01/1996');
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Checkboxes

Check the checkboxes with the click function:

userEvent.click(codingCheckbox);
userEvent.click(readingCheckbox);
userEvent.click(writingCheckbox);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Radio buttons

Choose an option from the radio button with the click function:

userEvent.click(osRadio);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Selects

Select the favorite city with the selectOptions function:

userEvent.selectOptions(favCitySelect, [tokyoOption]);osRadio);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Multi-selects

Select countries I want visit (again) with the selectOptions

userEvent.selectOptions(countriesMultiSelect, [japanOption, germanyOption, netherlandsOption]);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

And after filling all the form, we are able to click the submit button:

userEvent.click(button);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

How does all come together?

import React from 'react';
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
import { Form } from '../Form';

describe('Form', () => {
  it('fills form', () => {
    render(<Form />);

    const nameInput = screen.getByLabelText(/name/i);
    const ageInput = screen.getByLabelText(/age/i);
    const birthdayInput = screen.getByLabelText(/birthday/i);

    const codingCheckbox = screen.getByLabelText(/coding/i);
    const readingCheckbox = screen.getByLabelText(/reading/i);
    const writingCheckbox = screen.getByLabelText(/writing/i);

    const osRadio = screen.getByLabelText(/mac/i);

    const favCitySelect = screen.getByTestId(/favcity/i);
    const tokyoOption = screen.getByText(/tokyo/i);

    const countriesMultiSelect = screen.getByTestId(/countries/i);
    const japanOption = screen.getByText(/japan/i);
    const germanyOption = screen.getByText(/germany/i);
    const netherlandsOption = screen.getByText(/netherlands/i);

    const button = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i })

    userEvent.type(nameInput, 'TK');
    userEvent.type(ageInput, '24');
    userEvent.type(birthdayInput, '01/01/1996');

    userEvent.click(codingCheckbox);
    userEvent.click(readingCheckbox);
    userEvent.click(writingCheckbox);

    userEvent.click(osRadio);

    userEvent.selectOptions(favCitySelect, [tokyoOption]);
    userEvent.selectOptions(countriesMultiSelect, [japanOption, germanyOption, netherlandsOption]);

    userEvent.click(button);
  });
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This is a simple form, but if we want to add some validation, we can think of how a user would use the form.

Have each form field a validation of presence that show a text below each field? We could, for example, click the submit buttons and verify which fields have the validation text until it doesn't have any error anymore.

How to handle fetching and loading

Now we will see an example of fetching within a component and test the loading state and then the data rendered in the DOM.

import React from 'react';
import { useFetchAPI } from './useFetchAPI';

const Loading = ({ pokemon }) => {
  const {
    hasError,
    isLoading,
    isResolved,
    data
  } = useFetchAPI(`https://pokeapi.co/api/v2/pokemon/${pokemon}`);

  if (hasError) {
    return <p>Error!</p>;
  }

  if (isLoading) {
    return <p>Loading...</p>;
  }

  if (!isResolved) {
    return null;
  }

  const { name, types } = data;
  const skills = types.map(type => type.type.name).join(', ');

  return (
    <>
      <h1>Name: {name}</h1>
      <p>Skills: {skills}</p>
    </>
  )
};

export default Loading;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This is a very simple component that we'll use to test the loading and the error state and the data rendered.

Here we have:

  • A custom hook for fetching: it uses the fetch function to request data from any API.
  • The custom hook receives a url that it will request and returns 4 values: hasError, isLoading, isResolved, and the data to render.
  • Below we have three if statements to handle the error, the loading, and when the request didn't finish.
  • And then we have the data we want to render: the name and skills of a pokemon.

Let's first test the error state when the API responds with an error.

it('renders the error', async () => {
  fetch.mockReject(() => Promise.reject('API is down'));

  render(<Loading pokemon="charmander" />);

  const error = await screen.findByText('Error!');
  expect(error).toBeInTheDocument();
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • The first thing I did was to mock the fetch function to simulate that the API will respond with an error.
  • Then we render the Loading component with a prop called pokemon and a value charmander.
  • We try to find the text Error!.
  • And verify if it is actually in the document.

We use the findByText because the error state will appear only after the fetching finishes, so it's a asynchronous operation. This is why we need to have an async-await in the test.

Now for the happy path: we fetch the pokemon, the loading state appears, and then the pokemon data renders in the DOM.

it('renders the loading and then the pokemon info', async () => {
  const data = { name: 'charmander', types: [{ type: { name: 'fire' } }] };
  fetch.once(JSON.stringify(data));

  render(<Loading pokemon="charmander" />);

  const loading = screen.getByText('Loading...');
  expect(loading).toBeInTheDocument();

  const charmander = await screen.findByText('Name: charmander');
  const charmanderSkills = await screen.findByText('Skills: fire');

  expect(charmander).toBeInTheDocument();
  expect(charmanderSkills).toBeInTheDocument();
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • The first two lines we define the data and mock the fetch to return this value for us.
  • We fetch the Loading component passing charmander
  • Then we first want to see the Loading... text in the document.
  • And then verify if the pokemon name and skills are in the document.

Now everything together:

import React from 'react';
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import Loading from '../Loading';

describe('Loading', () => {
  it('renders the loading and then the pokemon info', async () => {
    const data = { name: 'charmander', types: [{ type: { name: 'fire' } }] };
    fetch.once(JSON.stringify(data));

    render(<Loading pokemon="charmander" />);

    const loading = screen.getByText('Loading...');
    expect(loading).toBeInTheDocument();

    const charmander = await screen.findByText('Name: charmander');
    const charmanderSkills = await screen.findByText('Skills: fire');

    expect(charmander).toBeInTheDocument();
    expect(charmanderSkills).toBeInTheDocument();
  });

  it('renders the error', async () => {
    fetch.mockReject(() => Promise.reject('API is down'));

    render(<Loading pokemon="charmander" />);

    const error = await screen.findByText('Error!');
    expect(error).toBeInTheDocument();
  });
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Final words

So here we finish this first conversation about tests in frontend. We've learned a lot of things:

  • How to: query elements in the DOM
  • How to: verify content in the document
  • How to: test forms
  • How to: handle fetching and loading

I wanted to cover as much as possible, but I think this is a good start to understand how to use this tool to test our applications and gain more confidence when shipping features or refactorings to production. I hope these recipes can help you understand more about testing in general and improve the quality of your software.

Until the next time! Keep learning!

Top comments (0)