πΉ Problem: Minimum Difference in Sums After Removal of Elements
Difficulty:#Hard
Tags: #Heap, #PrefixSum, #Greedy, #SlidingWindow, #PriorityQueue
π Problem Summary
We are given an array nums
of length 3n
.
We need to remove a subsequence of exactly n
elements, leaving 2n
elements. Then divide these 2n
into:
- First part of length
n
βsumfirst
- Second part of length
n
βsumsecond
We must return the minimum value of sumfirst - sumsecond
we can get.
π§ My Thought Process
Brute Force Idea:
Try every combination of removingn
elements and then splitting the remaining2n
into two halves. Calculate the difference.
βοΈ This isO(comb(3n, n))
β completely intractable forn
up to1e5
.Optimized Strategy:
The idea is:
-
Fix the first n elements: Use a max heap to maintain the smallest prefix sum of size
n
from the left 2n elements. -
Fix the last n elements: Use a min heap to maintain the largest suffix sum of size
n
from the right 2n elements. - Traverse the middle
n
elements and at each point:
- Maintain `part1[i]`: the minimum possible sum from left side of `n` elements (using max heap).
- Maintain the max suffix sum from the right (using min heap).
- For each split, compute `part1[i] - part2[i]` and update the minimum.
- Algorithm Used: β [[Prefix_Sum]] β [[Heap]]
βοΈ Code Implementation (Python)
class Solution:
def minimumDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
n3, n = len(nums), len(nums) // 3
# Step 1: Min prefix sum of n elements using max heap
part1 = [0] * (n + 1)
total = sum(nums[:n])
ql = [-x for x in nums[:n]]
heapq.heapify(ql)
part1[0] = total
for i in range(n, 2 * n):
total += nums[i]
heapq.heappush(ql, -nums[i])
total -= -heapq.heappop(ql)
part1[i - (n - 1)] = total
# Step 2: Max suffix sum of n elements using min heap
part2_sum = sum(nums[2 * n:])
qr = nums[2 * n:]
heapq.heapify(qr)
ans = part1[n] - part2_sum
for i in range(2 * n - 1, n - 1, -1):
part2_sum += nums[i]
heapq.heappush(qr, nums[i])
part2_sum -= heapq.heappop(qr)
ans = min(ans, part1[i - n] - part2_sum)
return ans
β±οΈ Time & Space Complexity
-
Time:
O(n log n)
-
Space:
O(n)
for the heaps and prefix arrays
π§© Key Takeaways
- β Maintaining a fixed-size max/min set using heaps can help simulate optimal greedy choices.
- β Breaking a problem into βleftβ, βmiddleβ, and βrightβ sections often allows efficient precomputation.
- π‘ The use of prefix heap building and suffix heap building is extremely powerful.
- π If a problem involves
k
removals or partitions and is performance-critical, try monotonic data structures, heaps, or multisets.
π Reflection (Self-Check)
[x] Could I solve this without help?
β The idea was in my head but I struggled with the implementation.[ ] Did I write code from scratch?
β I could eventually write it after understanding the heap transitions.[x] Did I understand why it works?
β Yes, but it required stepping through slowly.[x] Will I be able to recall this in a week?
β I will if I practice prefix/suffix heap techniques again.
π Related Problems
- [[238 Product of Array Except Self]]
- [[2099 Find Subsequence of Length K With the Largest Sum]]
- [[notes/3469 Find Minimum Cost to Remove Array Elements]]
π Progress Tracker
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Day | 47 |
Total Problems Solved | 388 |
Confidence Today | π |
Leetcode Rating | 1572 |
Top comments (0)