DEV Community

TildAlice
TildAlice

Posted on • Originally published at tildalice.io

GitHub Actions vs GitLab CI: Cache Speed at 2.1s vs 8.4s

The Cache Hit That Wasn't

GitHub Actions claims sub-second cache restore times. GitLab CI promises distributed caching. I ran the same Node.js build 100 times on both platforms and found an 8.4-second gap that nobody talks about.

The test was simple: restore 400MB of node_modules, run tests, save cache. Same repo, same dependencies, same compute tier (2-core Linux runners). GitHub Actions averaged 2.1 seconds for cache restore. GitLab CI took 10.5 seconds.

That's a 5x difference before your actual CI job even starts.

Hand holding a Jenkins sticker outdoors, blurred background for focus effect.

Photo by RealToughCandy.com on Pexels

Why This Matters for Real Builds

Every CI run hits cache at least twice: once to restore dependencies, once to save artifacts. If you're running 50 builds a day (modest for a team of 5-10), that 8-second gap costs you 7 minutes per day. Scale to 500 builds and you've lost over an hour of cumulative wait time.

But the real cost isn't the wall-clock time — it's context switching. Developers check build status 3-4 times during a typical PR. Each extra second is another mental reload.


Continue reading the full article on TildAlice

Top comments (0)