Snapdom has made major performance leaps since v1.8.0.
Simple elements (ms, lower is better)
| Scenario | Snapdom (current) | Snapdom v1.8.0 | html2canvas | modern-screenshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small (200×100) | 0.4 | 1.2 | 70.3 | 11.9 |
| Modal (400×300) | 0.4 | 1.1 | 68.8 | 14.1 |
| Page View | 0.4 | 1.0 | 100.5 | 34.2 |
| Large Scroll | 0.4 | 1.0 | 153.1 | 77.8 |
| Very Large | 0.4 | 1.0 | 278.9 | 194.7 |
Complex elements (ms)
| Scenario | Snapdom (current) | Snapdom v1.8.0 | html2canvas | modern-screenshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small (200×100) | 1.1 | 3.2 | 72.5 | 16.1 |
| Modal (400×300) | 4.5 | 14.0 | 90.1 | 34.6 |
| Page View | 32.9 | 113.6 | 196.1 | 181.1 |
| Large Scroll | 133.9 | 387.4 | 446.6 | 635.9 |
| Very Large | 364.0 | 1200.4 | 1275.4 | 1685.6 |
⚡ Summary
- Snapdom (current) is 2–4× faster than v1.8.0
- Up to 500× faster than html2canvas
- Much faster than modern-screenshot, especially with large/complex DOMs
🧪 Benchmarks run with Chromium + Vitest on a 2018 MacBook Air
🏎️ Even better performance on modern hardware!
Top comments (0)