DEV Community

unity source code
unity source code

Posted on

Building a Color Block Jam Style 3D Puzzle Game in Unity: A Developer's Deep Dive

Block-jam puzzle games have quietly become one of the most reliable genres in the hyper-casual and casual mobile space. If you've spent any time browsing the top charts, you've almost certainly seen a title where the goal is simple: slide colored blocks out of a confined space before you run out of moves. The mechanic is easy to learn, satisfying to master, and — from a developer's perspective — genuinely interesting to build well.

In this article I want to walk through what it actually takes to build a 3D block-jam puzzle game in Unity, using a real, shipped-style template — Color Block Jam 3D Puzzle — as the reference point. I'll cover the core gameplay loop, the systems you need to get right (grid logic, movement, level design, monetization), the performance traps that catch mobile devs off guard, and a practical checklist for taking a template like this from "it compiles" to "it's on the store."

Whether you're building from scratch, evaluating a Unity asset to reskin, or just trying to understand why this genre performs so well, this should give you a solid technical foundation.

Why Block-Jam Puzzles Work So Well on Mobile

Before touching any code, it's worth understanding why this genre is so dominant in casual mobile gaming, because the design goals should drive your architecture.

  1. Instant comprehension. A player understands the objective within two seconds of seeing the board — no tutorial wall of text required.
  2. Short session length. Levels typically resolve in 15–60 seconds, which fits perfectly into ad-supported, session-based monetization loops.
  3. High replay value through procedural difficulty. Because the core mechanic is spatial reasoning rather than reflexes, you can generate near-infinite levels algorithmically.
  4. Natural ad placement points. Level completion and failure states are clean, non-intrusive moments to show interstitials or offer rewarded continues.

These four properties dictate almost everything about how you should structure your Unity project. Let's get into it.

Core Gameplay Loop: Grid, Blocks, and Exit Logic

At its heart, a 3D block-jam game is a constraint-satisfaction puzzle rendered on a grid. The fundamental building blocks (pun intended) are:

  • A grid/board representation — usually a 2D or 3D array tracking occupied cells
  • Block entities — each with a color, a shape footprint, and a fixed movement axis
  • Exit/collection points — where blocks of a matching color need to reach
  • Move validation — checking whether a block can legally slide given current occupancy

A minimal grid representation might look like this:

public class GridCell
{
    public Vector2Int Position;
    public bool IsOccupied;
    public BlockController OccupyingBlock;
}

public class GridManager : MonoBehaviour
{
    public int width = 8;
    public int height = 8;
    private GridCell[,] cells;

    void Awake()
    {
        cells = new GridCell[width, height];
        for (int x = 0; x < width; x++)
        {
            for (int y = 0; y < height; y++)
            {
                cells[x, y] = new GridCell { Position = new Vector2Int(x, y) };
            }
        }
    }

    public bool CanMoveTo(Vector2Int target)
    {
        if (target.x < 0 || target.x >= width || target.y < 0 || target.y >= height)
            return false;

        return !cells[target.x, target.y].IsOccupied;
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This is deliberately simple, but it's the backbone everything else hangs off. The template referenced above extends this pattern into a full 3D coordinate system, since blocks in Color Block Jam move along a constrained axis in 3D space rather than a flat 2D board — which changes your collision and raycasting approach meaningfully.

Handling 3D Movement Constraints

The "3D" part of these puzzle games isn't just a visual upgrade over 2D match-style games — it changes the interaction model. Each block typically has a locked movement axis (it can only slide forward/backward along one direction), which means your input handling needs to:

  1. Raycast from touch/mouse input to detect which block was selected
  2. Determine that block's allowed axis
  3. Project drag input onto that axis
  4. Validate the path is clear before committing the move
  5. Animate the slide, then re-evaluate the board state (did the block reach an exit? Did it unblock another block?)
void OnDrag(Vector2 screenDelta)
{
    Vector3 axis = selectedBlock.MovementAxis;
    float projectedDistance = Vector3.Dot(screenDelta, axis);

    Vector2Int direction = projectedDistance > 0
        ? selectedBlock.PositiveDirection
        : selectedBlock.NegativeDirection;

    if (gridManager.CanMoveTo(selectedBlock.GridPosition + direction))
    {
        selectedBlock.Slide(direction);
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The important detail here is path validation, not just destination validation — a 3-cell-long block needs every cell along its path checked, not just the final resting cell, or you'll get blocks visually clipping through each other.

Level Design: Data-Driven, Not Hardcoded

If you're building (or extending) a puzzle game with any real content pipeline, hardcoding levels in the scene is a dead end after level 10. Every serious block-jam implementation uses a data-driven level format, typically JSON or ScriptableObjects, so that:

  • Level designers can iterate without touching code
  • You can procedurally generate levels and validate solvability offline
  • Live-ops teams can push new level packs post-launch without a full app update

A ScriptableObject-based level definition is usually the cleanest approach in Unity:

[CreateAssetMenu(fileName = "Level", menuName = "Puzzle/LevelData")]
public class LevelData : ScriptableObject
{
    public int gridWidth;
    public int gridHeight;
    public List<BlockDefinition> blocks;
    public int moveLimit;
    public float parTime;
}

[System.Serializable]
public class BlockDefinition
{
    public Vector2Int startPosition;
    public Vector2Int size;
    public BlockColor color;
    public MovementAxis axis;
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This structure also makes it trivial to build a level editor tool inside Unity's Editor window, which is genuinely worth the half-day investment if you plan to ship more than a handful of levels. Designers dragging blocks onto a grid and hitting "Save" is dramatically faster than editing raw JSON.

Solvability: The Problem Nobody Talks About Enough

Here's something a lot of tutorials skip entirely: not every configuration of blocks on a grid is solvable. If you're procedurally generating levels, or even hand-placing them quickly, you need a solver pass that verifies a level can actually be completed before it ships.

The simplest reliable approach is a breadth-first search over the state space:

  • Each unique board configuration is a node
  • Each legal move is an edge
  • The goal state is "all target-colored blocks have exited"
  • If BFS from the initial state can reach a goal state within your move limit, the level is solvable

For small grids (8x8 or smaller with a handful of blocks) this is computationally cheap enough to run at build time or even at runtime for procedural generation. Skipping this step is the single most common reason indie block-jam clones ship with unsolvable levels and get torched in reviews.

Performance: Where 3D Puzzle Games Quietly Fall Apart

3D puzzle games look deceptively simple, but there are a few specific performance traps that hit this genre harder than others:

1. Draw calls from unique block materials. If every block color uses a separate material and shader variant, you'll rack up draw calls fast on a crowded board. Use a single shader with a color property (or a texture atlas) and batch via GPU instancing.

2. Physics-based sliding. It's tempting to use Rigidbody + physics collisions for block movement because it "just works" visually. Don't. Use kinematic, grid-based movement with tweened animation (DOTween or a simple coroutine lerp) instead — physics-driven puzzle logic is a constant source of edge-case bugs (blocks nudging each other out of grid alignment, floating point drift, etc.).

3. Overdraw from transparent UI and particle effects. Block-jam games love juicy VFX on level completion — confetti, particle bursts, glow trails. On mid-range Android devices, unoptimized overdraw from these effects is a common cause of frame drops right at the moment you most want the game to feel polished.

4. Garbage collection spikes from per-move allocations. If your move validation or pathing logic allocates new lists/arrays every single drag event, you'll get GC stutter during exactly the interaction that needs to feel buttery smooth. Pool your temporary collections.

Monetization Architecture

Puzzle games with clear level boundaries are genuinely well-suited to ad monetization, but the implementation details matter for retention:

  • Interstitials should fire on level completion, not level start — showing an ad before a player even sees the puzzle is a fast way to inflate churn.
  • Rewarded video works best as an opt-in unstuck mechanic — offering extra moves or a hint after a failed attempt, rather than being forced.
  • Banner ads, if used at all, belong on menu/level-select screens, never during active gameplay where they compete for touch input space.

Structuring your monetization calls behind an interface rather than calling AdMob/Unity Ads SDKs directly throughout your codebase will save you significant pain later:

public interface IAdService
{
    void ShowInterstitial(System.Action onComplete);
    void ShowRewarded(System.Action onReward, System.Action onFailed);
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This lets you swap mediation providers, A/B test ad frequency, or add a mediation layer without touching gameplay code — something that matters a lot once you're running live-ops experiments on ad placement.

Reskinning: What Actually Needs to Change

If you're starting from an existing template rather than building from zero — which is a completely reasonable choice given how solved the core mechanics are for this genre — the real differentiation work happens in a fairly narrow set of places:

  • Visual theme: block materials, environment lighting, particle effects, UI skin
  • Meta progression: whether you add a level map, currency system, or daily rewards layer on top of the core loop
  • Difficulty curve: move limits, grid sizes, and the pacing of new mechanics (locked blocks, obstacles, special colors)
  • Monetization tuning: ad frequency and rewarded-ad placement, calibrated against your own retention data

Before you start layering changes onto any existing Unity codebase — whether it's your own six-month-old project or a template you've picked up — it's worth doing a proper audit first so you know what you're actually working with. I wrote a full checklist for this exact situation here: How to Audit a Unity Codebase Before You Reskin It. It covers dependency checks, asset bloat, deprecated API usage, and the kind of technical debt that turns a "quick reskin" into a multi-week rewrite if you skip it.

Publishing Checklist

A few things worth confirming before you push a build to the stores, specific to this genre:

  • [ ] Grid and block colliders don't leak physics jitter into visual position
  • [ ] Level solver pass has validated every level in your content set
  • [ ] Ad SDK calls are behind an interface and tested in both online/offline states
  • [ ] Draw calls per typical board state are profiled (Unity Frame Debugger) on a mid-tier device, not just your dev machine
  • [ ] Save/load system handles interrupted sessions (app killed mid-level) gracefully
  • [ ] Android back-button and iOS gesture navigation don't break mid-drag input
  • [ ] Localization strings are externalized, not hardcoded in UI prefabs

Wrapping Up

Block-jam puzzle games are a great genre to build in Unity precisely because the mechanics are well-understood but the execution quality still varies enormously between shipped titles. The difference between a forgettable clone and a chart-performing puzzle game usually comes down to the details covered above: clean grid logic, verified solvability, disciplined performance profiling, and monetization that respects the player's session.

If you want to see a complete, working implementation of these systems rather than building the grid logic, level format, and movement handling from scratch, the Color Block Jam 3D Puzzle Unity template is a solid reference point — it's AdMob-ready, optimized for both Android and iOS, and structured with clean, documented C# scripts that are straightforward to extend. It's also a good case study to pair with the audit checklist above if you're evaluating whether to build on top of it or use it purely as a learning reference.

For more Unity source code and game templates across other genres, the full catalog is browsable here: Unity Games Category.

Top comments (0)