Originally published at vibeagentmaking.com
What the Forest Service knows about change that consultants don't.
The Suppression Paradox
When Roosevelt established the U.S. Forest Service in 1905, the mandate was: extinguish every fire immediately. Fire numbers dropped. Forests became denser, choked with unburned fuel. Small fires decreased while catastrophic ones multiplied.
Indigenous peoples had conducted controlled burns for roughly ten thousand years -- systematic maintenance, not random acts. Suppression doctrine halted this, creating an accumulated deficit now being "paid back with interest."
What Prescribed Fire Actually Is
The U.S. Forest Service executes ~4,500 controlled burns annually. Fewer than 1% escape containment. Research shows combinations of thinning and prescribed fire still measurably reduce wildfire severity twenty years later.
The 2022 Black Fire in New Mexico burned over 131,000 hectares but only ~4% at high severity, thanks to prior fuels-reduction treatments. The fire occurred; catastrophic damage did not.
The Spotfire Asymmetry
A spotfire -- an ember landing outside the burn perimeter -- happens in roughly 1 of every 5 burns. Yet fewer than 1 of every 100 burns escape. Crews expect spotfires. They position equipment to contain them.
Most change programs treat small negative consequences as signals to abort. Prescribed-fire discipline treats them as signals the system is functioning as designed.
A system that cannot absorb its own routine spotfires is a system forced to choose between stagnation and catastrophe.
The Organizational Mapping
- Fuel load: accumulated dysfunction -- dead projects, forgotten processes, unresolved resentments
- Ignition: deliberate small-scale change -- pilots, sandbox teams, chaos tests
- Pre-positioned crews: rollback plans, drafted communication, executive sponsorship
- Spotfires: unexpected consequences treated as discoveries, not failures
- Wildfires: forced restructurings, regulatory mandates, talent exodus
- Burning platforms: the moment control is lost
Why We Don't Do This
Despite evidence, barriers persist: liability exposure, air-quality regulations, narrow weather windows, public opposition, and a severe shortage of trained burners.
Organizations face analogous barriers: legal/HR exposure, visible communication failures, and critically -- most organizations have no internal change-craft. When every initiative is someone's first, the work never becomes routine.
What the Practice Looks Like
- Define burn windows deliberately -- post-launch, post-quarter-close -- rather than reactively
- Pre-position containment before ignition
- Reframe unexpected consequences as discoveries in after-action reviews
- Build a burn association: communities of practice around change-craft
Maintenance, Not Transformation
For Indigenous peoples, controlled fire was seasonal maintenance -- "the work." The companies that figure this out will win not because they ran a heroic reorganization, but because they ran a few thousand small burns that nobody wrote a book about.
Of ~4,500 annual Forest Service burns, seven escape. The other 4,493 succeed precisely as designed.
Top comments (0)