DEV Community

Wajahat Karim 🇵🇰
Wajahat Karim 🇵🇰

Posted on • Originally published at on

How is Flutter Different from Native, Web-view, and Other Cross-platform Frameworks

Flutter is an application development framework from Google for creating cross-platform mobile applications (in iOS and Android). As mentioned on the official website, it aims to make the development as easy, quick, and productive as possible. Features such as Hot Reload, a vast widget catalog, very good performance, and a solid community contribute to meeting that objective and make Flutter a pretty good mobile development framework.

This post is an excerpt from the book Google Flutter Mobile Development Quick Start Guide by Packt Publishing written by Prajyot Mainkar, and Salvatore Giordano. This is a fast-paced guide to get you started with cross-platform mobile application development with Google Flutter.

When speaking of mobile application development, there are many different approaches that we can find, but, in the end, everything comes down to either a native or a cross-platform approach. Let’s see how different approaches look and work when compared to Flutter. We will first take a look at the native platforms, and then, before looking at the cross-platform approach, we will take a look at the WebView system, and finally we will see where Flutter fits into this mix.

Native Platforms

Native frameworks such as Android and iOS SDKs are rock solid. They are the most stable choice for mobile application development. They have lots of available apps that are deeply tested and have a large community and openly available tutorials. The following diagram displays the working of native mobile application development frameworks:

As we can see in the preceding diagram, the app in this framework talks directly to the system. This makes the native framework the most powerful choice in terms of functionality. However, it does have a drawback: you need to learn two different languages, Kotlin or Java for Android, Obj-C or Swift for iOS and the SDKs. These languages are used to write two different apps with the same functionalities. Every modification must be duplicated on both platforms, and the process might not be that smooth. It is not a good choice for a small team or for someone who needs speed in their development process.

WebView Platforms

On the other hand, we have the cross-platform approach, which is famous for being productive. In this approach, we can get the application for both Android and iOS from a single code base, just like in Flutter. But every framework has some drawbacks.

Cordova-, Ionic-, PhoneGap-, and WebView-based frameworks in general are goodexamples of cross-platform frameworks, and they are especially good solutions for frontend developers. But these lack in performance, and the app view in these approaches is composed by a WebView rendering HTML; this means that the app is basically a website.

The following diagram shows how a WebView-based framework works:

The system uses a bridge to make the switch between JavaScript to the native system. This process will be too slow, depending on the features you need,which adds another drawback to this system.

Other Cross-Platform Approaches

Let’s take an example of another cross-platform approach to see what could be the shortcomings of it. Xamarin is the Windows answer to cross-platform development, which in my opinion is not so convenient, especially in terms of productivity and compiling time.

When looking at other platforms, React Native could be considered as one of the best cross-platform frameworks, but it heavily relies on OEM components.

Let’s take a look at the workings of React Native:

React Native expands the bridge concept in the WebView systems, and uses it not only for services, but also to build widgets. This is really dangerous in terms of performance; for example, a component may be built hundreds of times during an animation, but due to the expanded concept of the bridge, this component may slow down to a great extent. This could also lead to other problems, especially on Android, which is the most fragmented operating system.

Read more at: React Native VS Xamarin: Which is the better cross-platform mobile development framework?

Flutter’s Approach to Mobile App Development

In the previous sections, we took a look at different approaches to mobile application development. We have briefly seen how these approaches work and their drawbacks. Now let’s take a look at Flutter.

Flutter performs much better in comparison to other solutions, because the application is compiled AOT (Ahead Of Time) instead of JIT (Just In Time) like the JavaScript solutions. It also eliminates the concept of the bridge and does not rely on the OEM platform. It does allow custom components to use all the pixels in the screen. What does this mean? It basically means that the app displays the same on every version of Android and iOS.

We did take a look at the workings of other approaches, so let’s take a look at the workings of Flutter as well. You can see the way the Flutter framework works as shown in the following diagram:

Now you can see the difference between other cross-platform approaches and Flutter. As stated before, Flutter eliminated the bridge and the OEM platform and uses Widgets Rendering instead to work with the canvas and events. And it uses Platform Channels to use the services. In addition, it is not difficult to use platform APIs with an asynchronous messaging system, which means if you need to use a specific Android or iOS feature, you can do it easily.

Flutter also makes it possible to create plugins using channels that can be used by every new developer. So, to put it simply: code once, and use it everywhere!

In this post we compared Flutter to existing mobile development frameworks – native, WebView, and cross-platform. To further understand the fundamentals of Flutter and to get started with cross-platform mobile app development, read Google Flutter Mobile Development Quick Start Guide by Packt Publishing.

If you liked this article, you can read my new articles below:

Build a One-on-One Android Chat App using Kotlin

📆 Reflections on 2018 — My Year In Review

Wajahat Karim is a graduate from NUST, Islamabad, an experienced mobile developer, an active open source contributor, and co-author of two books Learning Android Intents and Mastering Android Game Development with Unity. In his spare time, he likes to spend time with his family, do experiments on coding, loves to write about lots of things (mostly on blog and medium) and is passionate contributor to open source. In June 2018, one of his library became #1 on Github Trending. His libraries have about 2000 stars on Github and are being used in various apps by the developers all around the globe. Follow him on Twitter and Medium to get more updates about his work in Writing, Android and Open Source.

Also, if you have any questions you’d like him to answer, contact him through his website at with DEAR WAJAHAT in the subject line.

Top comments (3)

jmfayard profile image
Jean-Michel 🕵🏻‍♂️ Fayard • Edited

Your article is really good.

There are three more approaches that would be worth mentioning, that have different tradeoffs from what you described.

Basecamp pioneered an hybrid approach: the navigation is done natively but the content is rendered in a web view. Interesting solution for web first teams. This is what the iPhone and Android apps are doing.

Kotlin multiplatform is for teams that are doing currently native development but are tired at writing everything twice and want to start sharing code: data model, database, networking, business logic, tests.

Games and other apps where native widgets do not matter can use Unreal engine.

Bottom line: don't let anybody tell you that there is one solution that is better than the others. It's all context dependent.

wajahatkarim profile image
Wajahat Karim 🇵🇰

Totally agree with your points on other ways for cross-platform. And yes, I always get the questions like which is best to use etc. I tell them that nothing is good or best. Every platform has its own pros and cons. It all depends on the app and its context that which platform will take less effort with great quality.

98sky profile image

I want to open camera in webView , in android native using java , and javascript , can any one help me how to call from js side