OpenAI's Assistants API and Anthropic's Claude both offer ways to build AI agents that maintain context and use tools. The right choice depends on what you're building. Here's a technical comparison.
Context Window and Memory
Claude (claude-sonnet-4-6):
- 200K token context window
- You manage conversation history manually as an array of messages
- No built-in persistence — you store and load history from your database
- Full control over what context the model sees
OpenAI Assistants API:
- Threads handle conversation history automatically
- Built-in persistence via Thread IDs
- Less control over context truncation behavior
- Simpler for basic chatbots, harder to debug
Tool Use / Function Calling
Claude:
const response = await anthropic.messages.create({
model: 'claude-sonnet-4-6',
max_tokens: 1024,
tools: [{
name: 'get_stock_price',
description: 'Get the current price of a stock',
input_schema: {
type: 'object',
properties: {
ticker: { type: 'string', description: 'Stock ticker symbol' }
},
required: ['ticker']
}
}],
messages: [{ role: 'user', content: 'What is AAPL trading at?' }]
})
// Claude returns a tool_use block
if (response.stop_reason === 'tool_use') {
const toolUse = response.content.find(b => b.type === 'tool_use')
const price = await getStockPrice(toolUse.input.ticker)
// Continue conversation with tool result
}
OpenAI:
const run = await openai.beta.threads.runs.create(threadId, {
assistant_id: assistantId,
})
// Poll for completion
while (run.status === 'requires_action') {
const toolCalls = run.required_action.submit_tool_outputs.tool_calls
const outputs = await Promise.all(toolCalls.map(processToolCall))
await openai.beta.threads.runs.submitToolOutputs(threadId, run.id, {
tool_outputs: outputs
})
}
Claude's approach is synchronous and explicit. OpenAI's Assistants API requires polling, which adds latency and complexity.
Streaming
Claude:
const stream = anthropic.messages.stream({
model: 'claude-sonnet-4-6',
max_tokens: 1024,
messages,
})
for await (const event of stream) {
if (event.type === 'content_block_delta') {
process.stdout.write(event.delta.text)
}
}
OpenAI:
const stream = openai.beta.threads.runs.stream(threadId, { assistant_id })
for await (const event of stream) {
if (event.event === 'thread.message.delta') {
process.stdout.write(event.data.delta.content[0].text.value)
}
}
Both support streaming. Claude's API is more direct.
Pricing (as of 2025)
| Model | Input | Output |
|---|---|---|
| claude-sonnet-4-6 | $3/1M tokens | $15/1M tokens |
| claude-haiku-4-5 | $0.25/1M tokens | $1.25/1M tokens |
| gpt-4o | $5/1M tokens | $15/1M tokens |
| gpt-4o-mini | $0.15/1M tokens | $0.60/1M tokens |
Claude Haiku is competitive with GPT-4o-mini for high-volume tasks.
When to Choose Claude
- Long document analysis (200K context)
- Complex reasoning with tool use
- Agentic workflows where you need full control
- When you want synchronous tool execution (no polling)
- Production reliability and detailed system prompts
When to Choose OpenAI
- Simple chatbots where thread persistence is convenient
- Vision tasks (GPT-4o is strong)
- When your team already has deep OpenAI tooling
- Fine-tuning requirements
The Practical Answer
For agentic, tool-using applications: Claude's explicit message-based API is easier to debug and gives you more control. For simple conversational UIs: OpenAI Assistants saves boilerplate. Many production systems use both — Claude for complex reasoning, GPT-4o-mini for high-volume classification.
The AI SaaS Starter at whoffagents.com ships with both Claude and OpenAI API routes pre-configured — switch between models with one env variable. $99 one-time.
Top comments (0)