A colleague dropped a folder of supplier photos on me in mid-July — a dozen HEIC files. Double-click, Windows wants a decoder, install it, two of them still won't open. That afternoon I was three pages into searching "HEIC to JPG online" when I clicked something I'd never heard of. Two months later it sits first in my bookmarks bar.
My first instinct had actually been to ask him to change a phone setting and shoot JPG instead. He could — there's a "Most Compatible" toggle — but those dozen photos were already taken, and the setting only helps going forward. So they had to be converted. The sites I found were interchangeable: drag in, watch a progress bar, download. One popped a signup dialog on the third file. Another handed back an image with a watermark in the corner. The one I landed on, ImgIng, just converted and downloaded, nothing in the way. I assumed it was another "free for a few tries" site and forgot about it. Early August I had a post going out with oversized images, went back to it, and found it did more than convert — and one detail made me stop: it had already picked the settings. A screenshot got a different profile than a photo. I never touched a slider, the file came out at a fraction of the size, and zoomed in I couldn't see the difference. That's when it went into the bookmarks.
The call I got wrong
I needed a transparent background for some marketing assets, so I ran one through. The model downloads the first time you use it and there's a wait, which I expected. What I didn't expect was the output: the edge hadn't been "cleaned up". Every tool I'd used before automatically contracts and feathers the edge so it looks crisp. This one does nothing by default and leaves those steps to you.
My first reaction was that the feature was half-finished. Then I compared a shot with a lot of hair in it and got it: the automatic cleanup does look better, and the price is that fine strands and semi-transparent areas get eaten along with the fringe. A one-click clean edge is paid for in detail.
Honestly though, I still can't decide whether it's the right default. It suits me because I'm cutting out hair, but most people are cutting out a product on white and probably just want the clean edge — for them the extra step is a nuisance. My take is it should just be a toggle; right now you go digging in the parameters for it.
Everything after that was uneventful. Demo animations for our docs site: GIF, APNG and animated WebP all interconvert, and you can change individual frame durations, delete frames, reorder them. Text out of screenshots via OCR, and the tables come back as tables with rows and columns intact rather than a pile of loose words. The PDF side does a lot too — compression that keeps the text layer and links rather than flattening pages to images, PDF to image, pulling the original embedded images straight out, content extraction in reading order, and HTML both directions. DOCX and PPTX convert to standalone offline HTML, which is handy for people without Office. The image editor and the AI upscaler I've only poked at, and video compression opened a few days ago — haven't touched it, so I won't talk it up.
I went looking for the paywall
Never found one. Unmetered, no account, no watermark on export, and not one of the things above turned out to be gated behind a plan. The explanation they give is that common formats run in your own browser, so one more operation costs them nothing — which I checked. Open DevTools, Network tab, process an image: no upload request, and the preview's src is a blob: URL, an object living in your browser's memory. Ten seconds of work, considerably more informative than a privacy policy. It's at imging.ai, no signup.
What it can't do
Not everything runs locally. HEIC can be read but not written, and TIFF and JPEG 2000 go to the server; the UI colour-codes them — though I'll admit I had no idea what those colours meant the first time and clicked around for a while before working out they mark where processing happens. So don't treat "your images aren't uploaded" as blanket coverage; it holds for the features you actually use. It also leans on your machine: running background removal on the old box at work, the model load alone took a while, and it's obviously slower than a server-side service. The image editor doesn't compare to real software either — I only use it for simple compositing.
It hasn't replaced any of my professional tools; Photoshop still opens. What changed is the scattered stuff, which no longer means bouncing between three or four sites. If your image work is varied but small-scale, or the files aren't things you want leaving your machine, it's worth a look. If you're batching thousands, go get a command-line tool instead.
Top comments (0)