Every day we receive and send dozens of emails. Emails are intangible things, we tend to forget that datacenters and servers are needed to have access to our mailboxes 24 hours a day 7 days a week.
Mike Berners-Lee wrote a book about carbon footprint of everyday products called "How bad are bananas? The carbon footprint of everything". He estimates the carbon footprint of an email to 4 grams of CO2 which is about 130 kg per person per year. To make it more meaningful, it is equivalent to 1000 kilometers driven by car.
To reduce our carbon footprint let's clean our mailboxes! I did it yesterday and removed about 40 000 emails (my mailbox is aged of ten years). There are tools to help you removing emails and unsubscribe newsletters (only 10% of newsletters are opened) such as cleanfox (they also plant trees in Zambia to reduce their own carbon footprint). For those using Gmail there are also tips to remove easily your old emails like older_than filter.
Do you have other tech tips to reduce our personal carbon footprint ?
Latest comments (21)
Great post, check mine its about the carbon footprint too and javascript
Javascript saves the world
Youssef Rabei ・ Apr 14 ・ 4 min read
Thankyou. This is THE thing - ppl talk about saving the environment but don't get the daily issues right. Recycle or at least separate trash, make lights out if not necessary or delete unused data. <3
Really interesting! 😯
I had never thought about this before 🤔
This is so well put. I see people leaving tens of thousands of e-mails in their Inboxes, because they are too lazy to delete them all. Given the impact it has, more people should be made aware of it.
I'm in favour of email services charging $0.02 per email sent. Recipients as beneficiaries.
It would reduce waste by a large portion. Worse than carbon, its human time lost on tons of useless messages...
Interesting idea and I know the idea comes from good intentions, yet I don't see it working primarily because of:
People already pay enough for:
Fees for the above services already factor in wholesale bandwidth.
If we go down this path we may as well charge for:
Give them an inch and they (the powers that be) will take a mile, eventually.
Why not focus on bigger wins such as Video and Audio streaming services?
Watch less, listen to less, consume less - sounds like a good idea of course until we realise that not everyone uses these mediums the same way and that means some people will be penalised over others.
Definitely agree on reducing your email footprint but once we start imposing fees per send then slope gets very slippery and it becomes ripe for corruption and gate keeping while potentially not having the result we want.
It should be an optional feature available for email users.
When someone sends a message, they'll receive an auto-reply asking to pay the fee. The message would stay in a cache for a few days, then auto-deleted if the fee is not paid. A "whitelist" would allow friends & family to bypass the paywall.
That doesn't solve the problem. Horrible idea no matter how anyone looks at it, sorry. This has way more downsides than upsides.
Sorry, but isn't anyone quite a few people for you to speak on behalf of? Would solve my problem... But I agree it's not a good-looking idea 😉
Great Topic! I am now cleaning all my mail boxes, I never even thought of this.
I think 4 grams of CO2 mostly means the delivery of the E-Mail. Also I think cleaning out your mailbox, especially when you're using Gmail, means it's still on their servers and backups 10-fold, probably.
An E-Mail stored on a storage media does only secondarily, maybe, cause more CO2 due to more storage being bought to store more of them. With out current density though
Though this article is maybe also a good point of data: medium.com/stanford-magazine/carbo...
Nontheless, searching for and removing emails causes even more of a carbon footprint in a web browser expensively rendering web pages, the web server chugging for the data, database servers, etc... Which might tip the scales a bit. A Google Search apparently has 0.2g of carbon footprint, but given many datacenters use green energy nowadays (does your home?) that might be neutral.
Overanalysis of a topic, good way to spend my time.
Anyway; how about reducing emails you get at all? Sign out from some newsletters. Use a laptop more instead of a tower (if you own both, buying one or the other is a crazy footprint), they're very energy efficient.
Or check out the good old outside instead of watching media, also helps yourself.
Hey! Thank you @yvonnickfrin
I struggled understanding
older_thanin gmail.For people that struggle too, here are some pattern that works:
older_than:2yOlder than 2 yearsolder_than:2mOlder than 2 monthsDocumentation I found: support.google.com/mail/answer/719...
Do NOT insert a space after your
:!Sorry, I should have add an example. Another important information for email threads the date of the first email of the thread is the reference.
I've been making a big effort lately to unsubscribe from mailing lists. I've run a script in my Gmail for years to send marketing emails to a folder where I don't really see them, but since I don't want them anyway, I'm trying to just stop getting them altogether.
Hey, nice topic! Glad to see people are feeling more and more concerned with our impact on the environment.
There are a lot of other small habits that also could make a difference :
Transition takes time!
Hey Maxime Cool. I had the same opinion. Small things like this will turn into habits and we can contribute to environment