Tech Lead/Team Lead. Senior WebDev.
Intermediate Grade on Computer Systems-
High Grade on Web Application Development-
MBA (+Marketing+HHRR).
Studied a bit of law, economics and design
Location
Spain
Education
Higher Level Education Certificate on Web Application Development
There's no possible discussion nowadays on this question.
Windows + WSL (windows subsystem for Linux)
That means you have a windows 10/11 plus a Linux core in the same OS.
WSL2 was a great push on this tech and WSLg is promising to be even better (didn't tried it yet).
Remember to update your windows to the latest version before.
Back those days I had dual boot so I was using Elementary OS, Ubuntu, Debian or whatever distro to code and if I want anything else I had to reboot, log in into windows and do whatever I need to do.
Design tools in Linux are sh*t, gaming on Linux is a joke (nearly as sh*t as it is with MacOS) and so on.
Usefulness
With WSL the dual boot thingy is gone, I've all my setup in the same OS/environment plus I can use tools like PowerToys to split my secondary screen into 3 parts (I've the secondary screen in vertical) and other useful utilities that are shipped along powertoys like a color picker.
Other tools like DevToys are useful as well, I'm using them almost every day, and they run on windows so another mini-point to this setup 😆
Ergonomics
A better compatibility with monitor drivers, peripherals and gadgets on Windows (in comparison with Linux and MacOS) is also a must. Having my screen running at higher framerate (170Hz for the main monitor, 75Hz on my secondary one) plus with FreeSync/G-Sync enabled while working to reduce flickering is nice to my eyes and my eye fatigue at the end of the day.
That's something that you simply can't reach with MacOS or Linux 99% of the time.
Edge cases
If you are going to go all for smartphone apps, I feel that there's the only case where MacOS would be required (meaning iOS MacOS Apps, even using frameworks such React Native).
If you're going to code Android Apps only then windows is OK as well, but having a Mac opens the door to iOS development.
I'd say Linux for development because you're usually closest to the deployment targets (docker, kubernetes or any unix based environment). But that's easy for me to say having a Linux, Windows and a Mac ready on my desk.
Tech Lead/Team Lead. Senior WebDev.
Intermediate Grade on Computer Systems-
High Grade on Web Application Development-
MBA (+Marketing+HHRR).
Studied a bit of law, economics and design
Location
Spain
Education
Higher Level Education Certificate on Web Application Development
If anything I'd try to get rid of windows and macOS. Was using the Mac way more when I was still working as a composer. Today I use the Mac as a communication machine. Teams, Slack etc. And for testing. The same (plus gaming) on Windows.
Been a Windows users for 20+ years. Never used a mac, and only used Inux to repair bricked laptops up until 2 months ago.
Now I work on a mac daily and liked so much i even nuked my my windows machine and installed lastest Ubuntu.
I'm converted. Mac OS is amazing for a lot of things, bht as a dev I do prefer Linux for flexibility and lack of bloatware.
I see no benefit these days to choosing an OS. Used to be windows only supported .net development no with .net Core upwards you can run this only machine.
GNU/Linux. Because Free (Free as in Freedom) software is easier to use period. I don't need windows' videogames or MacOS' video editing software, and in general, proprietary software often feels unintuitive and clunky to me. Apart from the practical side of things, i also think that GNU/Linux pushes you to think about the ethics of things, windows or MacOS might be "convenient" to use, but by using them you essentially become a puppet of the proprietor, even if you're using a torrented and/or modified version. Even if Windows or MacOS were 95% "open source", the 5% of un-opensourced code would still be enough to plant malicious features, thus subjugating user freedom.
I'm an old-time programmer for work and for fun. C is my favorite color. Temporarily hooked AI. I love to share thoughts on programming that go beyond the basics.
I've almost always had to use Windows for a variety of reasons (corporate policies, Windows only software, etc, ...).
A linux machine was always present as a VM (VirtualBox mainly) for dev tasks.
Now, Windows WSL2-GUI changed everything. I see no reason to go back to managing a separate VM, for dev purpose I get everything I need there (including the GUI tools that I missed so much).
If you can live with a Linux only machine, that's good for you, otherwise WLS2 completely eliminated the need of choosing: you have both worlds on a single machine.
Probably windows, for the job and what I do. I think I can get most of my work done via WSL. If not then I can always dualboot or create a VM.
Though my personal preferrence for doing my work is MacOS.
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.
There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux!
Top comments (34)
Let me explain it in form of a limerick:
Now Windows is still the best way
if all that you want is to play,
Use Linux to hack
Or else get a Mac,
if you are really happy to pay.
Wow, that’s a brilliant limerick!
You can hack on all three and I like to play so Windows ;)
This is quality!
Now I am using Linux OS . I think that is good to use.
There's no possible discussion nowadays on this question.
Windows + WSL (windows subsystem for Linux)
That means you have a windows 10/11 plus a Linux core in the same OS.
WSL2 was a great push on this tech and WSLg is promising to be even better (didn't tried it yet).
Check the Microsoft official documentation about WSL.
Remember to update your windows to the latest version before.
Back those days I had dual boot so I was using Elementary OS, Ubuntu, Debian or whatever distro to code and if I want anything else I had to reboot, log in into windows and do whatever I need to do.
Design tools in Linux are sh*t, gaming on Linux is a joke (nearly as sh*t as it is with MacOS) and so on.
Usefulness
With WSL the dual boot thingy is gone, I've all my setup in the same OS/environment plus I can use tools like PowerToys to split my secondary screen into 3 parts (I've the secondary screen in vertical) and other useful utilities that are shipped along powertoys like a color picker.
Other tools like DevToys are useful as well, I'm using them almost every day, and they run on windows so another mini-point to this setup 😆
Ergonomics
A better compatibility with monitor drivers, peripherals and gadgets on Windows (in comparison with Linux and MacOS) is also a must. Having my screen running at higher framerate (170Hz for the main monitor, 75Hz on my secondary one) plus with FreeSync/G-Sync enabled while working to reduce flickering is nice to my eyes and my eye fatigue at the end of the day.
That's something that you simply can't reach with MacOS or Linux 99% of the time.
Edge cases
If you are going to go all for smartphone apps, I feel that there's the only case where MacOS would be required (meaning iOS MacOS Apps, even using frameworks such React Native).
If you're going to code Android Apps only then windows is OK as well, but having a Mac opens the door to iOS development.
What a troll bait... 😓
macOS + brew, win10/11 + wsl, linux + apt/yum/... Whatever !!
With code & intellij available everywhere, I don't care what os my employer give me as long as they give me a good machine with root access 😁
I'd say Linux for development because you're usually closest to the deployment targets (docker, kubernetes or any unix based environment). But that's easy for me to say having a Linux, Windows and a Mac ready on my desk.
I ended up selling my MacBook Pro in 2017 and never look back 😆
Now I've just an iPad mini to test things in Safari and that's all.
What do you use your Mac for? Have you tried using WSL in your windows to get rid of the Linux one?
If anything I'd try to get rid of windows and macOS. Was using the Mac way more when I was still working as a composer. Today I use the Mac as a communication machine. Teams, Slack etc. And for testing. The same (plus gaming) on Windows.
Been a Windows users for 20+ years. Never used a mac, and only used Inux to repair bricked laptops up until 2 months ago.
Now I work on a mac daily and liked so much i even nuked my my windows machine and installed lastest Ubuntu.
I'm converted. Mac OS is amazing for a lot of things, bht as a dev I do prefer Linux for flexibility and lack of bloatware.
I see no benefit these days to choosing an OS. Used to be windows only supported .net development no with .net Core upwards you can run this only machine.
GNU/Linux. Because Free (Free as in Freedom) software is easier to use period. I don't need windows' videogames or MacOS' video editing software, and in general, proprietary software often feels unintuitive and clunky to me. Apart from the practical side of things, i also think that GNU/Linux pushes you to think about the ethics of things, windows or MacOS might be "convenient" to use, but by using them you essentially become a puppet of the proprietor, even if you're using a torrented and/or modified version. Even if Windows or MacOS were 95% "open source", the 5% of un-opensourced code would still be enough to plant malicious features, thus subjugating user freedom.
I've almost always had to use Windows for a variety of reasons (corporate policies, Windows only software, etc, ...).
A linux machine was always present as a VM (VirtualBox mainly) for dev tasks.
Now, Windows WSL2-GUI changed everything. I see no reason to go back to managing a separate VM, for dev purpose I get everything I need there (including the GUI tools that I missed so much).
If you can live with a Linux only machine, that's good for you, otherwise WLS2 completely eliminated the need of choosing: you have both worlds on a single machine.
Probably windows, for the job and what I do. I think I can get most of my work done via WSL. If not then I can always dualboot or create a VM.
Though my personal preferrence for doing my work is MacOS.
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.
There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux!